Journalists, Emotions, and the Introduction of Generative AI Chatbots: A Large-Scale Analysis of Tweets Before and After the Launch of ChatGPT

Read original: arXiv:2409.08761 - Published 9/16/2024 by Seth C. Lewis, David M. Markowitz, Jon Benedik Bunquin
Total Score

0

๐Ÿค–

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This study investigated the emotional responses of journalists to the release of ChatGPT in late 2022
  • Analyzed nearly 1 million tweets from journalists at major U.S. news outlets
  • Tracked changes in emotional tone and sentiment before and after ChatGPT's introduction
  • Found an increase in positive emotion and more favorable tone post-launch, suggesting initial optimism

Plain English Explanation

The researchers looked at how journalists at major U.S. news outlets felt about the release of the AI chatbot ChatGPT. They analyzed almost 1 million tweets written by these journalists before and after ChatGPT came out in November 2022. Using techniques to measure emotional tone and sentiment, they found that journalists expressed more positive emotions and a more favorable view of ChatGPT after its release. This suggests that journalists were initially optimistic about the potential of this new AI technology. The study highlights the important role journalists play in shaping public perceptions of emerging technologies like generative AI.

Technical Explanation

The researchers collected and analyzed nearly 1 million tweets from journalists at major U.S. news outlets. They used computational and natural language processing methods to track changes in emotional tone and sentiment before and after the introduction of ChatGPT in November 2022. The analysis revealed an increase in positive emotion and a more favorable overall tone in journalists' tweets following ChatGPT's release. This suggests that journalists' initial reactions to this new generative AI tool were optimistic about its potential. The study provides insights into how journalists, as key interpreters of technological innovation, may shape public narratives around emerging technologies like AI.

Critical Analysis

The study offers valuable insights into how journalists, as influential voices, perceive and respond to the introduction of disruptive technologies like ChatGPT. However, the research is limited to a specific time period around the initial launch of ChatGPT. It would be useful to examine how journalists' sentiments and perceptions evolve over a longer timeframe as the technology matures and its implications become clearer. Additionally, the study focused on a U.S. context, so further research could explore cross-cultural differences in journalists' reactions to the emergence of generative AI. Overall, the findings highlight the need to closely monitor the interplay between journalism, emotion, and technological change.

Conclusion

This study provides an interesting glimpse into how journalists at major U.S. news outlets emotionally responded to the release of the AI chatbot ChatGPT. By analyzing nearly 1 million tweets, the researchers found that journalists expressed increased positive sentiment and a more favorable tone toward the technology after its introduction. This suggests journalists may have been initially optimistic about the potential of generative AI tools. The research underscores the pivotal role journalists play as interpreters of technological innovation, and how their emotional reactions can shape broader public narratives around emerging technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on ๐• โ†’

Related Papers

๐Ÿค–

Total Score

0

Journalists, Emotions, and the Introduction of Generative AI Chatbots: A Large-Scale Analysis of Tweets Before and After the Launch of ChatGPT

Seth C. Lewis, David M. Markowitz, Jon Benedik Bunquin

As part of a broader look at the impact of generative AI, this study investigated the emotional responses of journalists to the release of ChatGPT at the time of its launch. By analyzing nearly 1 million Tweets from journalists at major U.S. news outlets, we tracked changes in emotional tone and sentiment before and after the introduction of ChatGPT in November 2022. Using various computational and natural language processing techniques to measure emotional shifts in response to ChatGPT's release, we found an increase in positive emotion and a more favorable tone post-launch, suggesting initial optimism toward AI's potential. This research underscores the pivotal role of journalists as interpreters of technological innovation and disruption, highlighting how their emotional reactions may shape public narratives around emerging technologies. The study contributes to understanding the intersection of journalism, emotion, and AI, offering insights into the broader societal impact of generative AI tools.

Read more

9/16/2024

๐ŸŒฟ

Total Score

0

How ChatGPT Changed the Media's Narratives on AI: A Semi-Automated Narrative Analysis Through Frame Semantics

Igor Ryazanov, Carl Ohman, Johanna Bjorklund

The recent explosion of attention to AI is arguably one of the biggest in the technology's media coverage. To investigate the effects it has on the discourse, we perform a mixed-method frame semantics-based analysis on a dataset of more than 49,000 sentences collected from 5846 news articles that mention AI. The dataset covers the twelve-month period centred around the launch of OpenAI's chatbot ChatGPT and is collected from the most visited open-access English-language news publishers. Our findings indicate that during the half year succeeding the launch, media attention rose tenfold$unicode{x2014}$from already historically high levels. During this period, discourse has become increasingly centred around experts and political leaders, and AI has become more closely associated with dangers and risks. A deeper review of the data also suggests a qualitative shift in the types of threat AI is thought to represent, as well as the anthropomorphic qualities ascribed to it.

Read more

8/13/2024

Breaking News: Case Studies of Generative AI's Use in Journalism
Total Score

0

Breaking News: Case Studies of Generative AI's Use in Journalism

Natalie Grace Brigham, Chongjiu Gao, Tadayoshi Kohno, Franziska Roesner, Niloofar Mireshghallah

Journalists are among the many users of large language models (LLMs). To better understand the journalist-AI interactions, we conduct a study of LLM usage by two news agencies through browsing the WildChat dataset, identifying candidate interactions, and verifying them by matching to online published articles. Our analysis uncovers instances where journalists provide sensitive material such as confidential correspondence with sources or articles from other agencies to the LLM as stimuli and prompt it to generate articles, and publish these machine-generated articles with limited intervention (median output-publication ROUGE-L of 0.62). Based on our findings, we call for further research into what constitutes responsible use of AI, and the establishment of clear guidelines and best practices on using LLMs in a journalistic context.

Read more

6/21/2024

๐Ÿงช

Total Score

0

ChatGPT and Its Educational Impact: Insights from a Software Development Competition

Sunhee Hwang, Yudoo Kim, Heejin Lee

This study explores the integration and impact of ChatGPT, a generative AI that utilizes natural language processing, in an educational environment. The main goal is to evaluate how ChatGPT affects project performance. To this end, we organize a software development competition utilizing ChatGPT, lasting for four weeks and involving 36 students. The competition is structured in two rounds: in the first round, all 36 students participate and are evaluated based on specific performance metrics such as code quality, innovation, and adherence to project requirements. The top 15 performers from the first round are then selected to advance to the second round, where they compete for the final rankings and the overall winner is determined. The competition shows that students who use ChatGPT extensively in various stages of development, including ideation, documentation, software development, and quality assurance, have higher project completion rates and better scores. A detailed comparative analysis between first-round and second-round winners reveals significant differences in their experience with generative AI for software development, experience learning large-scale language models, and interest in their respective fields of study. These findings suggest that ChatGPT enhances individual learning and project performance. A post-survey of participants also reveals high levels of satisfaction, further emphasizing the benefits of integrating generative AI like ChatGPT in academic settings. This study highlights the transformative potential of ChatGPT in project-based learning environments and supports further research into its long-term impact and broader application in a variety of educational contexts.

Read more

9/9/2024