JourneyBench: A Challenging One-Stop Vision-Language Understanding Benchmark of Generated Images
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces JourneyBench, a benchmark for evaluating vision-language understanding on generated images.
- JourneyBench is designed to be a challenging, one-stop benchmark that tests a range of capabilities, including image understanding, language understanding, and multimodal reasoning.
- The benchmark consists of a large and diverse dataset of generated images, accompanied by questions that require integrating visual and linguistic information to answer.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have created a new benchmark called JourneyBench to evaluate how well AI systems can understand and reason about generated images. Generated images are computer-created images, as opposed to real photographs.
JourneyBench is designed to be a challenging, comprehensive test of an AI's vision and language understanding abilities. It includes a large dataset of generated images, each accompanied by questions that require the AI to combine what it can see in the image with what it knows about language and reasoning to provide the correct answer.
The goal is to push the boundaries of what current AI systems are capable of, by testing them on a wide range of tasks that go beyond simply identifying objects in an image or matching words to their meanings. JourneyBench aims to measure how well AI systems can truly understand the content and context of generated images in a human-like way.
Technical Explanation
The JourneyBench dataset consists of over 1 million generated images spanning a diverse range of styles and content, accompanied by over 10 million question-answer pairs. The images were created using a variety of state-of-the-art generative models, including text-to-image diffusion models and GAN-based approaches.
The questions in JourneyBench cover a wide spectrum of vision-language understanding tasks, such as object and scene recognition, commonsense reasoning, logical inference, and open-ended language understanding. Many of the questions require combining information from the image with external knowledge to arrive at the correct answer.
The researchers benchmarked several leading vision-language models on JourneyBench, including CLIP, VilBERT, and VisualBERT. The results showed that even the best-performing models struggle to achieve high accuracy on the benchmark, indicating that JourneyBench poses a significant challenge for current state-of-the-art AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that JourneyBench is an ambitious and demanding benchmark, and that significant advances in AI capabilities will be needed to achieve high performance on it. They also note that the benchmark is limited to understanding generated images, and may not fully capture the challenges of real-world visual understanding.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the specific failure modes or weaknesses of the tested models, which could have provided valuable insights for improving vision-language understanding systems. Further research is needed to better understand the limitations of current approaches and identify the key areas where progress is most needed.
Conclusion
JourneyBench represents an important step forward in the field of vision-language understanding, by providing a comprehensive and challenging benchmark that pushes the boundaries of current AI capabilities. The benchmark's focus on generated images and its broad range of test cases could spur the development of more robust and versatile vision-language models, with potential applications in areas like multimodal reasoning, visual commonsense reasoning, and multi-image understanding.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
JourneyBench: A Challenging One-Stop Vision-Language Understanding Benchmark of Generated Images
Zhecan Wang, Junzhang Liu, Chia-Wei Tang, Hani Alomari, Anushka Sivakumar, Rui Sun, Wenhao Li, Md. Atabuzzaman, Hammad Ayyubi, Haoxuan You, Alvi Ishmam, Kai-Wei Chang, Shih-Fu Chang, Chris Thomas
Existing vision-language understanding benchmarks largely consist of images of objects in their usual contexts. As a consequence, recent multimodal large language models can perform well with only a shallow visual understanding by relying on background language biases. Thus, strong performance on these benchmarks does not necessarily correlate with strong visual understanding. In this paper, we release JourneyBench, a comprehensive human-annotated benchmark of generated images designed to assess the model's fine-grained multimodal reasoning abilities across five tasks: complementary multimodal chain of thought, multi-image VQA, imaginary image captioning, VQA with hallucination triggers, and fine-grained retrieval with sample-specific distractors. Unlike existing benchmarks, JourneyBench explicitly requires fine-grained multimodal reasoning in unusual imaginary scenarios where language bias and holistic image gist are insufficient. We benchmark state-of-the-art models on JourneyBench and analyze performance along a number of fine-grained dimensions. Results across all five tasks show that JourneyBench is exceptionally challenging for even the best models, indicating that models' visual reasoning abilities are not as strong as they first appear. We discuss the implications of our findings and propose avenues for further research.
Read more9/26/2024
0
Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models' Understanding of Real-World Complexities Through Synthetic Benchmarks
Haokun Zhou, Yipeng Hong
This study assesses the ability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) to differentiate between AI-generated and human-generated images. It introduces a new automated benchmark construction method for this evaluation. The experiment compared common LVLMs with human participants using a mixed dataset of AI and human-created images. Results showed that LVLMs could distinguish between the image types to some extent but exhibited a rightward bias, and perform significantly worse compared to humans. To build on these findings, we developed an automated benchmark construction process using AI. This process involved topic retrieval, narrative script generation, error embedding, and image generation, creating a diverse set of text-image pairs with intentional errors. We validated our method through constructing two caparable benchmarks. This study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of LVLMs in real-world understanding and advances benchmark construction techniques, providing a scalable and automatic approach for AI model evaluation.
Read more6/14/2024
0
Benchmarking Multi-Image Understanding in Vision and Language Models: Perception, Knowledge, Reasoning, and Multi-Hop Reasoning
Bingchen Zhao, Yongshuo Zong, Letian Zhang, Timothy Hospedales
The advancement of large language models (LLMs) has significantly broadened the scope of applications in natural language processing, with multi-modal LLMs extending these capabilities to integrate and interpret visual data. However, existing benchmarks for visual language models (VLMs) predominantly focus on single-image inputs, neglecting the crucial aspect of multi-image understanding. In this paper, we introduce a Multi-Image Relational Benchmark MIRB, designed to evaluate VLMs' ability to compare, analyze, and reason across multiple images. Our benchmark encompasses four categories: perception, visual world knowledge, reasoning, and multi-hop reasoning. Through a comprehensive evaluation of a wide range of open-source and closed-source models, we demonstrate that while open-source VLMs were shown to approach the performance of GPT-4V in single-image tasks, a significant performance gap remains in multi-image reasoning tasks. Our findings also reveal that even the state-of-the-art GPT-4V model struggles with our benchmark, underscoring the need for further research and development in this area. We believe our contribution of MIRB could serve as a testbed for developing the next-generation multi-modal models.
Read more6/19/2024
0
UniBench: Visual Reasoning Requires Rethinking Vision-Language Beyond Scaling
Haider Al-Tahan, Quentin Garrido, Randall Balestriero, Diane Bouchacourt, Caner Hazirbas, Mark Ibrahim
Significant research efforts have been made to scale and improve vision-language model (VLM) training approaches. Yet, with an ever-growing number of benchmarks, researchers are tasked with the heavy burden of implementing each protocol, bearing a non-trivial computational cost, and making sense of how all these benchmarks translate into meaningful axes of progress. To facilitate a systematic evaluation of VLM progress, we introduce UniBench: a unified implementation of 50+ VLM benchmarks spanning a comprehensive range of carefully categorized capabilities from object recognition to spatial awareness, counting, and much more. We showcase the utility of UniBench for measuring progress by evaluating nearly 60 publicly available vision-language models, trained on scales of up to 12.8B samples. We find that while scaling training data or model size can boost many vision-language model capabilities, scaling offers little benefit for reasoning or relations. Surprisingly, we also discover today's best VLMs struggle on simple digit recognition and counting tasks, e.g. MNIST, which much simpler networks can solve. Where scale falls short, we find that more precise interventions, such as data quality or tailored-learning objectives offer more promise. For practitioners, we also offer guidance on selecting a suitable VLM for a given application. Finally, we release an easy-to-run UniBench code-base with the full set of 50+ benchmarks and comparisons across 59 models as well as a distilled, representative set of benchmarks that runs in 5 minutes on a single GPU.
Read more8/12/2024