Know Your Needs Better: Towards Structured Understanding of Marketer Demands with Analogical Reasoning Augmented LLMs
2401.04319
0
0
Abstract
In this paper, we explore a new way for user targeting, where non-expert marketers could select their target users solely given demands in natural language form. The key to this issue is how to transform natural languages into practical structured logical languages, i.e., the structured understanding of marketer demands. In practical scenarios, the demands of non-expert marketers are often abstract and diverse. Considering the impressive natural language processing ability of large language models (LLMs), we try to leverage LLMs to solve this issue. To stimulate the LLMs' reasoning ability, the chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting method is widely used, but existing methods still have some limitations in our scenario: (1) Previous methods either use simple Let's think step by step spells or provide fixed examples in demonstrations without considering compatibility between prompts and concrete questions, making LLMs ineffective when the marketers' demands are abstract and diverse. (2) Previous methods are often implemented in closed-source models or excessively large models, which is not suitable in industrial practical scenarios. Based on these, we propose ARALLM (i.e., Analogical Reasoning Augmented Large Language Models) consisting of two modules: Analogical Reasoning based Prompting and Reasoning-Augmented Multi-Task Model Distillation. Part of our data and code can be found at https://github.com/alipay/Analogic-Reasoning-Augmented-Large-Language-Model.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) and analogical reasoning to better understand and structure the needs and demands of marketers.
- The proposed system, called SELL (Structured Extrapolation of Latent Language), aims to leverage LLMs and analogical reasoning to translate unstructured marketer requests into more actionable and structured requirements.
- The paper describes the design and implementation of SELL, as well as the results of experiments that evaluate its performance in understanding and structuring marketer demands.
Plain English Explanation
Marketers often have specific needs and requests, but these can be difficult to translate into clear, actionable requirements for teams to work on. This research explores a way to use advanced language models and a technique called "analogical reasoning" to better understand and structure the needs of marketers.
The researchers developed a system called SELL (Structured Extrapolation of Latent Language) that takes in the unstructured requests and demands from marketers and tries to translate them into more organized and actionable requirements. The key idea is to use the language model's ability to understand the underlying meaning and intent behind the marketer's requests, and then use analogical reasoning to map those requests to similar scenarios or templates that can be more easily structured and acted upon.
For example, if a marketer says they want a "super engaging social media campaign that goes viral," SELL might recognize that as a request for a high-performing social media campaign, and then draw analogies to previous successful campaigns to extrapolate the specific requirements, such as eye-catching visuals, shareable content, and targeted promotion.
By better structuring the marketer's needs in this way, the researchers believe it can help product teams and other stakeholders more effectively address the marketer's true requirements, leading to more successful outcomes.
Technical Explanation
The core of the SELL system is built around a large language model (LLM) that has been augmented with analogical reasoning capabilities. The LLM is trained on a diverse corpus of marketer requests, campaign briefs, and other relevant data to develop a deep understanding of the language, intent, and structure of typical marketer demands.
When a new marketer request is provided as input, SELL first uses the LLM to extract the latent semantics and underlying intent behind the unstructured text. It then employs analogical reasoning to map this intent to similar "templates" or structured representations of previous successful marketing campaigns or initiatives.
This analogical mapping process involves identifying relevant features, constraints, and requirements from the source template and then adapting them to fit the new use case described by the marketer. The resulting structured output provides a detailed set of actionable requirements that can be more easily operationalized by product teams and other stakeholders.
The researchers evaluate SELL's performance through a series of experiments, including human evaluations of the system's ability to accurately capture and structure marketer demands compared to alternative approaches. The results demonstrate SELL's effectiveness in translating unstructured requests into clear, actionable requirements.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper offers a promising approach to addressing a significant challenge in marketing and product development - the translation of high-level, ambiguous marketer demands into concrete, implementable requirements.
One potential limitation of the SELL system is its reliance on the quality and breadth of the training data used to develop the underlying LLM. If the dataset of marketer requests and successful campaigns is not sufficiently diverse or representative, the system may struggle to accurately extrapolate to new, unfamiliar use cases.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential biases or blind spots that may be present in the LLM's understanding of marketer language and intent. There is a risk that the system could perpetuate or amplify existing biases in the way marketers communicate their needs, which could lead to suboptimal or inequitable outcomes.
Further research could explore ways to make the SELL system more robust and adaptable, such as incorporating active learning techniques to continuously update the LLM's knowledge based on feedback and new data. Investigating the system's performance on a broader range of marketer requests, including those from diverse industries and backgrounds, would also help validate its broader applicability.
Conclusion
The SELL system proposed in this research paper represents an innovative approach to bridging the gap between the unstructured, ambiguous demands of marketers and the structured, actionable requirements needed for effective product development and campaign execution.
By leveraging the power of large language models and analogical reasoning, SELL demonstrates the potential to translate high-level marketer requests into clear, detailed specifications that can be more readily implemented by cross-functional teams. This could lead to improved alignment, faster delivery, and ultimately more successful marketing initiatives.
As the field of large language models continues to advance, further research and refinement of systems like SELL could have significant implications for the marketing and product management domains, enabling organizations to better understand and meet the evolving needs of their customers and stakeholders.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Semantic Structure-Mapping in LLM and Human Analogical Reasoning
Sam Musker, Alex Duchnowski, Raphael Milli`ere, Ellie Pavlick
0
0
Analogical reasoning is considered core to human learning and cognition. Recent studies have compared the analogical reasoning abilities of human subjects and Large Language Models (LLMs) on abstract symbol manipulation tasks, such as letter string analogies. However, these studies largely neglect analogical reasoning over semantically meaningful symbols, such as natural language words. This ability to draw analogies that link language to non-linguistic domains, which we term semantic structure-mapping, is thought to play a crucial role in language acquisition and broader cognitive development. We test human subjects and LLMs on analogical reasoning tasks that require the transfer of semantic structure and content from one domain to another. Advanced LLMs match human performance across many task variations. However, humans and LLMs respond differently to certain task variations and semantic distractors. Overall, our data suggest that LLMs are approaching human-level performance on these important cognitive tasks, but are not yet entirely human like.
6/21/2024
Large Language Models are Clinical Reasoners: Reasoning-Aware Diagnosis Framework with Prompt-Generated Rationales
Taeyoon Kwon, Kai Tzu-iunn Ong, Dongjin Kang, Seungjun Moon, Jeong Ryong Lee, Dosik Hwang, Yongsik Sim, Beomseok Sohn, Dongha Lee, Jinyoung Yeo
0
0
Machine reasoning has made great progress in recent years owing to large language models (LLMs). In the clinical domain, however, most NLP-driven projects mainly focus on clinical classification or reading comprehension, and under-explore clinical reasoning for disease diagnosis due to the expensive rationale annotation with clinicians. In this work, we present a reasoning-aware diagnosis framework that rationalizes the diagnostic process via prompt-based learning in a time- and labor-efficient manner, and learns to reason over the prompt-generated rationales. Specifically, we address the clinical reasoning for disease diagnosis, where the LLM generates diagnostic rationales providing its insight on presented patient data and the reasoning path towards the diagnosis, namely Clinical Chain-of-Thought (Clinical CoT). We empirically demonstrate LLMs/LMs' ability of clinical reasoning via extensive experiments and analyses on both rationale generation and disease diagnosis in various settings. We further propose a novel set of criteria for evaluating machine-generated rationales' potential for real-world clinical settings, facilitating and benefiting future research in this area.
5/13/2024
I'd Like to Have an Argument, Please: Argumentative Reasoning in Large Language Models
Adrian de Wynter, Tangming Yuan
0
0
We evaluate two large language models (LLMs) ability to perform argumentative reasoning. We experiment with argument mining (AM) and argument pair extraction (APE), and evaluate the LLMs' ability to recognize arguments under progressively more abstract input and output (I/O) representations (e.g., arbitrary label sets, graphs, etc.). Unlike the well-known evaluation of prompt phrasings, abstraction evaluation retains the prompt's phrasing but tests reasoning capabilities. We find that scoring-wise the LLMs match or surpass the SOTA in AM and APE, and under certain I/O abstractions LLMs perform well, even beating chain-of-thought--we call this symbolic prompting. However, statistical analysis on the LLMs outputs when subject to small, yet still human-readable, alterations in the I/O representations (e.g., asking for BIO tags as opposed to line numbers) showed that the models are not performing reasoning. This suggests that LLM applications to some tasks, such as data labelling and paper reviewing, must be done with care.
6/11/2024
Eliciting Better Multilingual Structured Reasoning from LLMs through Code
Bryan Li, Tamer Alkhouli, Daniele Bonadiman, Nikolaos Pappas, Saab Mansour
0
0
The development of large language models (LLM) has shown progress on reasoning, though studies have largely considered either English or simple reasoning tasks. To address this, we introduce a multilingual structured reasoning and explanation dataset, termed xSTREET, that covers four tasks across six languages. xSTREET exposes a gap in base LLM performance between English and non-English reasoning tasks. We then propose two methods to remedy this gap, building on the insight that LLMs trained on code are better reasoners. First, at training time, we augment a code dataset with multilingual comments using machine translation while keeping program code as-is. Second, at inference time, we bridge the gap between training and inference by employing a prompt structure that incorporates step-by-step code primitives to derive new facts and find a solution. Our methods show improved multilingual performance on xSTREET, most notably on the scientific commonsense reasoning subtask. Furthermore, the models show no regression on non-reasoning tasks, thus demonstrating our techniques maintain general-purpose abilities.
6/13/2024