KoDialogBench: Evaluating Conversational Understanding of Language Models with Korean Dialogue Benchmark

Read original: arXiv:2402.17377 - Published 6/18/2024 by Seongbo Jang, Seonghyeon Lee, Hwanjo Yu

🤔

Overview

This paper introduces KoDialogBench, a benchmark designed to assess the conversational capabilities of language models in the Korean language.
The paper collects native Korean dialogues on daily topics, structures them into diverse test datasets, and uses them to evaluate the performance of various language models.
The findings suggest that there is significant room for improvement in models' Korean conversation skills, and that recent training techniques can enhance their conversational proficiency.

Plain English Explanation

Chatbots and virtual assistants are becoming increasingly common, but they often struggle to communicate effectively in languages other than the ones they were primarily trained on. A previous paper highlighted the need for better evaluation of language models' capabilities in low-resource languages like Korean.

To address this, the researchers in this paper created KoDialogBench, a collection of Korean dialogues on everyday topics. They gathered these dialogues from public sources or translated them from other languages, and then organized them into various test datasets to measure a language model's understanding of Korean conversations.

The researchers then used KoDialogBench to evaluate the performance of different language models in tasks like comprehending Korean dialogues and selecting appropriate responses. The results showed that current language models still have significant room for improvement when it comes to conversing in Korean.

However, the researchers also found that recent advancements in language model training, such as techniques described in this paper, can help enhance a model's Korean conversational abilities. This suggests that with further research and development, we may see significant improvements in the ability of chatbots and virtual assistants to communicate effectively in a wider range of languages.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces KoDialogBench, a benchmark designed to assess the conversational capabilities of language models in the Korean language. The researchers collected native Korean dialogues on daily topics from public sources or translated them from other languages. They then structured these conversations into diverse test datasets, covering tasks such as dialogue comprehension and response selection.

To evaluate the performance of various language models, the researchers leveraged the KoDialogBench dataset and conducted extensive analyses. The experimental results indicate that there is significant room for improvement in models' ability to engage in Korean conversations. The researchers also found that recent training techniques, like those described in this paper, can effectively enhance the conversational proficiency of language models in Korean.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable contribution to the field of language model evaluation, particularly in the context of low-resource languages like Korean. By creating KoDialogBench, the researchers have addressed a significant gap in the existing benchmarks and paved the way for more comprehensive assessments of language models' capabilities in diverse languages.

However, the paper acknowledges that the KoDialogBench dataset is limited in its scope and may not capture the full breadth of conversational dynamics in Korean. Additionally, the researchers note that the evaluation tasks they employed, while carefully designed, may not fully capture the nuances and complexities of human-like dialogue.

Further research could explore incorporating more contextual and pragmatic aspects of conversation, as well as investigating the performance of language models in real-world conversational scenarios. Additionally, expanding the KoDialogBench dataset to include a wider range of topics and dialogue styles could provide a more comprehensive assessment of language models' abilities.

Conclusion

This paper presents a significant step forward in the evaluation of language models' conversational capabilities, particularly in the context of the Korean language. By introducing KoDialogBench, the researchers have provided a valuable tool for assessing the performance of language models in Korean dialogues.

The findings suggest that current language models still have room for improvement in their Korean conversation skills, but recent advancements in training techniques can help enhance their proficiency. This research paves the way for the development of more robust and versatile language models that can communicate effectively in a wider range of languages, ultimately improving the user experience for chatbots and virtual assistants.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤔

KoDialogBench: Evaluating Conversational Understanding of Language Models with Korean Dialogue Benchmark

Seongbo Jang, Seonghyeon Lee, Hwanjo Yu

As language models are often deployed as chatbot assistants, it becomes a virtue for models to engage in conversations in a user's first language. While these models are trained on a wide range of languages, a comprehensive evaluation of their proficiency in low-resource languages such as Korean has been lacking. In this work, we introduce KoDialogBench, a benchmark designed to assess language models' conversational capabilities in Korean. To this end, we collect native Korean dialogues on daily topics from public sources, or translate dialogues from other languages. We then structure these conversations into diverse test datasets, spanning from dialogue comprehension to response selection tasks. Leveraging the proposed benchmark, we conduct extensive evaluations and analyses of various language models to measure a foundational understanding of Korean dialogues. Experimental results indicate that there exists significant room for improvement in models' conversation skills. Furthermore, our in-depth comparisons across different language models highlight the effectiveness of recent training techniques in enhancing conversational proficiency. We anticipate that KoDialogBench will promote the progress towards conversation-aware Korean language models.

6/18/2024

Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard: Evaluating Large Language Models in Korean with Ko-H5 Benchmark

Chanjun Park, Hyeonwoo Kim, Dahyun Kim, Seonghwan Cho, Sanghoon Kim, Sukyung Lee, Yungi Kim, Hwalsuk Lee

This paper introduces the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard and the Ko-H5 Benchmark as vital tools for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in Korean. Incorporating private test sets while mirroring the English Open LLM Leaderboard, we establish a robust evaluation framework that has been well integrated in the Korean LLM community. We perform data leakage analysis that shows the benefit of private test sets along with a correlation study within the Ko-H5 benchmark and temporal analyses of the Ko-H5 score. Moreover, we present empirical support for the need to expand beyond set benchmarks. We hope the Open Ko-LLM Leaderboard sets precedent for expanding LLM evaluation to foster more linguistic diversity.

8/20/2024

CLIcK: A Benchmark Dataset of Cultural and Linguistic Intelligence in Korean

Eunsu Kim, Juyoung Suk, Philhoon Oh, Haneul Yoo, James Thorne, Alice Oh

Despite the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) for the Korean language, there remains an obvious lack of benchmark datasets that test the requisite Korean cultural and linguistic knowledge. Because many existing Korean benchmark datasets are derived from the English counterparts through translation, they often overlook the different cultural contexts. For the few benchmark datasets that are sourced from Korean data capturing cultural knowledge, only narrow tasks such as bias and hate speech detection are offered. To address this gap, we introduce a benchmark of Cultural and Linguistic Intelligence in Korean (CLIcK), a dataset comprising 1,995 QA pairs. CLIcK sources its data from official Korean exams and textbooks, partitioning the questions into eleven categories under the two main categories of language and culture. For each instance in CLIcK, we provide fine-grained annotation of which cultural and linguistic knowledge is required to answer the question correctly. Using CLIcK, we test 13 language models to assess their performance. Our evaluation uncovers insights into their performances across the categories, as well as the diverse factors affecting their comprehension. CLIcK offers the first large-scale comprehensive Korean-centric analysis of LLMs' proficiency in Korean culture and language.

7/8/2024

💬

KMMLU: Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding in Korean

Guijin Son, Hanwool Lee, Sungdong Kim, Seungone Kim, Niklas Muennighoff, Taekyoon Choi, Cheonbok Park, Kang Min Yoo, Stella Biderman

We propose KMMLU, a new Korean benchmark with 35,030 expert-level multiple-choice questions across 45 subjects ranging from humanities to STEM. While prior Korean benchmarks are translated from existing English benchmarks, KMMLU is collected from original Korean exams, capturing linguistic and cultural aspects of the Korean language. We test 27 public and proprietary LLMs and observe the best public model to score 50.5%, leaving significant room for improvement. This model was primarily trained for English and Chinese, not Korean. Current LLMs tailored to Korean, such as Polyglot-Ko, perform far worse. Surprisingly, even the most capable proprietary LLMs, e.g., GPT-4 and HyperCLOVA X do not exceed 60%. This suggests that further work is needed to improve LLMs for Korean, and we believe KMMLU offers the appropriate tool to track this progress. We make our dataset publicly available on the Hugging Face Hub and integrate the benchmark into EleutherAI's Language Model Evaluation Harness.

6/7/2024