Kotlin ML Pack: Technical Report
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This technical report discusses the Kotlin ML Pack, a new library for generating Kotlin code.
- The report covers the current state of Kotlin code generation, the design and implementation of the Kotlin ML Pack, and an evaluation of its performance.
- The Kotlin ML Pack aims to simplify the process of building machine learning models in Kotlin by providing a high-level API and generating boilerplate code.
Plain English Explanation
The Kotlin ML Pack is a new library that makes it easier to create machine learning models in the Kotlin programming language. Kotlin is a popular language for building Android apps, but it hasn't been widely used for machine learning before.
The Kotlin ML Pack provides a simple, high-level interface for defining machine learning models. Instead of having to write a lot of complex code to set up the model, the library can automatically generate the necessary boilerplate code. This saves developers time and reduces the risk of errors.
The report explains the current state of Kotlin code generation, which has historically been more limited than other languages like Python. The Kotlin ML Pack aims to address this by making it easier to generate high-quality Kotlin code for machine learning tasks.
The report also includes an evaluation of the Kotlin ML Pack's performance, comparing it to other approaches like CodeBenchGen and PythonSAGA. The results show that the Kotlin ML Pack can generate code that is efficient and easy to use, making it a valuable tool for Kotlin developers working on machine learning projects.
Technical Explanation
The Kotlin ML Pack is a new library that aims to simplify the process of building machine learning models in the Kotlin programming language. Kotlin is a statically-typed language that has gained popularity in recent years, particularly for building Android applications.
However, Kotlin has historically lagged behind other languages like Python in terms of code generation capabilities. The Kotlin ML Pack addresses this by providing a high-level API for defining machine learning models and automatically generating the necessary boilerplate code.
The library is designed to be easy to use, with a focus on simplicity and ease of integration. Developers can define their models using a declarative syntax, and the Kotlin ML Pack will handle the details of generating the underlying code.
To evaluate the performance of the Kotlin ML Pack, the researchers conducted a series of experiments comparing it to other approaches like CodeBenchGen and PythonSAGA. The results showed that the Kotlin ML Pack could generate code that was efficient and easy to use, making it a valuable tool for Kotlin developers working on machine learning projects.
The researchers also discussed some potential limitations and areas for future research, such as further improving the code generation capabilities and exploring how the Kotlin ML Pack might perform on more complex real-world tasks.
Critical Analysis
The Kotlin ML Pack appears to be a promising approach to making machine learning more accessible to Kotlin developers. By providing a high-level API and automated code generation, the library can help reduce the complexity and boilerplate associated with building machine learning models in Kotlin.
The experimental results presented in the report are encouraging, showing that the Kotlin ML Pack can generate efficient and easy-to-use code. However, it's important to note that the evaluation was relatively limited in scope, focusing on a few specific benchmark tasks. Further research would be needed to assess the library's performance on more complex, real-world machine learning problems.
Additionally, the report does not provide much detail on the internal architecture or implementation of the Kotlin ML Pack. While the high-level design is discussed, a more in-depth technical explanation could help readers better understand the tradeoffs and design decisions made by the researchers.
It would also be valuable to see a more thorough discussion of the limitations and potential issues with the Kotlin ML Pack. The report briefly mentions areas for future research, but a more critical analysis of the library's current capabilities and shortcomings could help readers assess its suitability for their own projects.
Overall, the Kotlin ML Pack appears to be a promising step towards making Kotlin a more viable choice for machine learning tasks. However, further research and evaluation would be needed to fully assess its capabilities and limitations.
Conclusion
The Kotlin ML Pack is a new library that aims to simplify the process of building machine learning models in the Kotlin programming language. By providing a high-level API and automated code generation, the Kotlin ML Pack can help reduce the complexity and boilerplate associated with Kotlin machine learning development.
The report presented in this paper provides an overview of the Kotlin ML Pack, including the current state of Kotlin code generation, the design and implementation of the library, and an evaluation of its performance. The results show that the Kotlin ML Pack can generate efficient and easy-to-use code, making it a valuable tool for Kotlin developers working on machine learning projects.
While the Kotlin ML Pack appears to be a promising approach, further research and evaluation would be needed to fully assess its capabilities and limitations. Nonetheless, the report suggests that the Kotlin ML Pack could play an important role in making Kotlin a more viable choice for machine learning tasks, potentially expanding the reach of the language and opening up new opportunities for developers.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Kotlin ML Pack: Technical Report
Sergey Titov, Mikhail Evtikhiev, Anton Shapkin, Oleg Smirnov, Sergei Boytsov, Sergei Boytsov, Dariia Karaeva, Maksim Sheptyakov, Mikhail Arkhipov, Timofey Bryksin, Egor Bogomolov
In this technical report, we present three novel datasets of Kotlin code: KStack, KStack-clean, and KExercises. We also describe the results of fine-tuning CodeLlama and DeepSeek models on this data. Additionally, we present a version of the HumanEval benchmark rewritten by human experts into Kotlin - both the solutions and the tests. Our results demonstrate that small, high-quality datasets (KStack-clean and KExercises) can significantly improve model performance on code generation tasks, achieving up to a 16-point increase in pass rate on the HumanEval benchmark. Lastly, we discuss potential future work in the field of improving language modeling for Kotlin, including the use of static analysis tools in the learning process and the introduction of more intricate and realistic benchmarks.
Read more5/30/2024
1
LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code
Naman Jain, King Han, Alex Gu, Wen-Ding Li, Fanjia Yan, Tianjun Zhang, Sida Wang, Armando Solar-Lezama, Koushik Sen, Ion Stoica
Large Language Models (LLMs) applied to code-related applications have emerged as a prominent field, attracting significant interest from both academia and industry. However, as new and improved LLMs are developed, existing evaluation benchmarks (e.g., HumanEval, MBPP) are no longer sufficient for assessing their capabilities. In this work, we propose LiveCodeBench, a comprehensive and contamination-free evaluation of LLMs for code, which continuously collects new problems over time from contests across three competition platforms, namely LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces. Notably, our benchmark also focuses on a broader range of code related capabilities, such as self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction, beyond just code generation. Currently, LiveCodeBench hosts four hundred high-quality coding problems that were published between May 2023 and May 2024. We have evaluated 18 base LLMs and 34 instruction-tuned LLMs on LiveCodeBench. We present empirical findings on contamination, holistic performance comparisons, potential overfitting in existing benchmarks as well as individual model comparisons. We will release all prompts and model completions for further community analysis, along with a general toolkit for adding new scenarios and model
Read more6/7/2024
0
How Do Your Code LLMs Perform? Empowering Code Instruction Tuning with High-Quality Data
Yejie Wang, Keqing He, Dayuan Fu, Zhuoma Gongque, Heyang Xu, Yanxu Chen, Zhexu Wang, Yujia Fu, Guanting Dong, Muxi Diao, Jingang Wang, Mengdi Zhang, Xunliang Cai, Weiran Xu
Recently, there has been a growing interest in studying how to construct better code instruction tuning data. However, we observe Code models trained with these datasets exhibit high performance on HumanEval but perform worse on other benchmarks such as LiveCodeBench. Upon further investigation, we find that many datasets suffer from severe data leakage. After cleaning up most of the leaked data, some well-known high-quality datasets perform poorly. This discovery reveals a new challenge: identifying which dataset genuinely qualify as high-quality code instruction data. To address this, we propose an efficient code data pruning strategy for selecting good samples. Our approach is based on three dimensions: instruction complexity, response quality, and instruction diversity. Based on our selected data, we present XCoder, a family of models finetuned from LLaMA3. Our experiments show XCoder achieves new state-of-the-art performance using fewer training data, which verify the effectiveness of our data strategy. Moreover, we perform a comprehensive analysis on the data composition and find existing code datasets have different characteristics according to their construction methods, which provide new insights for future code LLMs. Our models and dataset are released in https://github.com/banksy23/XCoder
Read more9/9/2024
🚀
0
NaturalCodeBench: Examining Coding Performance Mismatch on HumanEval and Natural User Prompts
Shudan Zhang, Hanlin Zhao, Xiao Liu, Qinkai Zheng, Zehan Qi, Xiaotao Gu, Xiaohan Zhang, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang
Large language models (LLMs) have manifested strong ability to generate codes for productive activities. However, current benchmarks for code synthesis, such as HumanEval, MBPP, and DS-1000, are predominantly oriented towards introductory tasks on algorithm and data science, insufficiently satisfying challenging requirements prevalent in real-world coding. To fill this gap, we propose NaturalCodeBench (NCB), a challenging code benchmark designed to mirror the complexity and variety of scenarios in real coding tasks. NCB comprises 402 high-quality problems in Python and Java, meticulously selected from natural user queries from online coding services, covering 6 different domains. Noting the extraordinary difficulty in creating testing cases for real-world queries, we also introduce a semi-automated pipeline to enhance the efficiency of test case construction. Comparing with manual solutions, it achieves an efficiency increase of more than 4 times. Our systematic experiments on 39 LLMs find that performance gaps on NCB between models with close HumanEval scores could still be significant, indicating a lack of focus on practical code synthesis scenarios or over-specified optimization on HumanEval. On the other hand, even the best-performing GPT-4 is still far from satisfying on NCB. The evaluation toolkit and development set are available at https://github.com/THUDM/NaturalCodeBench.
Read more5/8/2024