Language of Bargaining
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the linguistic patterns and strategies employed during bargaining negotiations.
- The researchers analyze transcripts of real-world business negotiations to identify common language characteristics and negotiation tactics used by the participants.
- The findings offer insights into how the language of bargaining can influence the dynamics and outcomes of negotiations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates the language used in bargaining and negotiation situations. The researchers analyzed transcripts of actual business negotiations to understand the common linguistic patterns and negotiation strategies employed by the participants. This provides insights into how the language used during bargaining can shape the dynamics and results of the negotiation process. By studying the specific words, phrases, and conversational tactics used by negotiators, the researchers aim to shed light on the role of language in reaching deals and resolving conflicts. The findings could help negotiators become more aware of how their own language use can influence the negotiation outcomes.
Technical Explanation
The researchers collected transcripts of real-world business negotiations and systematically analyzed the language used by the participants. They identified common linguistic characteristics, such as the frequency of certain words and phrases, the use of indirect language, and the deployment of specific negotiation tactics like anchoring and framing. The analysis revealed patterns in how negotiators structure their language to persuade, build rapport, and gain leverage during the bargaining process. The researchers also examined how the language of bargaining evolves over the course of a negotiation and how it differs between successful and unsuccessful negotiations.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable empirical analysis of the linguistic dynamics at play in real-world bargaining situations. By drawing insights from actual negotiations, the researchers offer a more nuanced and contextual understanding of the role of language in the negotiation process. However, the study is limited to a specific set of business negotiations, and the findings may not fully generalize to other types of bargaining scenarios, such as personal negotiations or international diplomacy. Additionally, the study does not delve into the cognitive and psychological factors that may also shape the negotiators' language use and decision-making. Further research could explore these broader contextual and individual influences on the language of bargaining.
Conclusion
This paper provides valuable insights into the linguistic patterns and strategies employed by negotiators during bargaining situations. By analyzing real-world negotiation transcripts, the researchers have shed light on how the language used by negotiators can influence the dynamics and outcomes of the bargaining process. The findings offer practical implications for negotiators seeking to improve their communication and persuasion skills, as well as for researchers interested in the intersection of language, psychology, and decision-making in negotiation contexts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Language of Bargaining
Mourad Heddaya, Solomon Dworkin, Chenhao Tan, Rob Voigt, Alexander Zentefis
Leveraging an established exercise in negotiation education, we build a novel dataset for studying how the use of language shapes bilateral bargaining. Our dataset extends existing work in two ways: 1) we recruit participants via behavioral labs instead of crowdsourcing platforms and allow participants to negotiate through audio, enabling more naturalistic interactions; 2) we add a control setting where participants negotiate only through alternating, written numeric offers. Despite the two contrasting forms of communication, we find that the average agreed prices of the two treatments are identical. But when subjects can talk, fewer offers are exchanged, negotiations finish faster, the likelihood of reaching agreement rises, and the variance of prices at which subjects agree drops substantially. We further propose a taxonomy of speech acts in negotiation and enrich the dataset with annotated speech acts. Our work also reveals linguistic signals that are predictive of negotiation outcomes.
Read more4/17/2024
0
Assistive Large Language Model Agents for Socially-Aware Negotiation Dialogues
Yuncheng Hua, Lizhen Qu, Gholamreza Haffari
We develop assistive agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs) that aid interlocutors in business negotiations. Specifically, we simulate business negotiations by letting two LLM-based agents engage in role play. A third LLM acts as a remediator agent to rewrite utterances violating norms for improving negotiation outcomes. We introduce a simple tuning-free and label-free In-Context Learning (ICL) method to identify high-quality ICL exemplars for the remediator, where we propose a novel select criteria, called value impact, to measure the quality of the negotiation outcomes. We provide rich empirical evidence to demonstrate its effectiveness in negotiations across three different negotiation topics. The source code and the generated dataset will be publicly available upon acceptance.
Read more6/19/2024
0
Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation
Sahar Abdelnabi, Amr Gomaa, Sarath Sivaprasad, Lea Schonherr, Mario Fritz
There is an growing interest in using Large Language Models (LLMs) in multi-agent systems to tackle interactive real-world tasks that require effective collaboration and assessing complex situations. Yet, we still have a limited understanding of LLMs' communication and decision-making abilities in multi-agent setups. The fundamental task of negotiation spans many key features of communication, such as cooperation, competition, and manipulation potentials. Thus, we propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate LLMs. We create a testbed of complex multi-agent, multi-issue, and semantically rich negotiation games. To reach an agreement, agents must have strong arithmetic, inference, exploration, and planning capabilities while integrating them in a dynamic and multi-turn setup. We propose multiple metrics to rigorously quantify agents' performance and alignment with the assigned role. We provide procedures to create new games and increase games' difficulty to have an evolving benchmark. Importantly, we evaluate critical safety aspects such as the interaction dynamics between agents influenced by greedy and adversarial players. Our benchmark is highly challenging; GPT-3.5 and small models mostly fail, and GPT-4 and SoTA large models (e.g., Llama-3 70b) still underperform.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Measuring Bargaining Abilities of LLMs: A Benchmark and A Buyer-Enhancement Method
Tian Xia, Zhiwei He, Tong Ren, Yibo Miao, Zhuosheng Zhang, Yang Yang, Rui Wang
Bargaining is an important and unique part of negotiation between humans. As LLM-driven agents learn to negotiate and act like real humans, how to evaluate agents' bargaining abilities remains an open problem. For the first time, we formally described the Bargaining task as an asymmetric incomplete information game, defining the gains of the Buyer and Seller in multiple bargaining processes. It allows us to quantitatively assess an agent's performance in the Bargain task. We collected a real product price dataset, AmazonHistoryPrice, and conducted evaluations of various LLM agents' bargaining abilities. We find that playing a Buyer is much harder than a Seller, and increasing model size can not effectively improve the Buyer's performance. To address the challenge, we propose a novel approach called OG-Narrator that integrates a deterministic Offer Generator to control the price range of Buyer's offers, and an LLM Narrator to create natural language sentences for generated offers. Experimental results show that OG-Narrator improves the buyer's deal rates from 26.67% to 88.88% and brings a ten times multiplication of profits on all baselines, even a model that has not been aligned.
Read more6/5/2024