Language Complexity and Speech Recognition Accuracy: Orthographic Complexity Hurts, Phonological Complexity Doesn't

Read original: arXiv:2406.09202 - Published 6/14/2024 by Chihiro Taguchi, David Chiang

💬

Overview

The paper investigates how linguistic factors, such as orthographic and phonological complexity, affect the performance of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) models.
The researchers fine-tuned the multilingual self-supervised pretrained model Wav2Vec2-XLSR-53 on 25 languages with 15 writing systems to examine the relationship between ASR accuracy and various linguistic factors.
The results show that orthographic complexities, such as the number of graphemes and grapheme entropy, significantly correlate with lower ASR accuracy, while phonological complexity does not have a significant effect.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to understand how the complexity of a language's writing system and sound system can impact the performance of automatic speech recognition (ASR) models. To do this, they took a powerful multilingual speech recognition model called Wav2Vec2-XLSR-53 and trained it on 25 different languages, each with its own writing system and sound system.

The key things they looked at were:

The number of letters or characters in the writing system (graphemes)
How predictable and structured the writing system is (grapheme entropy)
How much information about words and word parts is encoded in the writing system (logographicity)
The number of distinct speech sounds (phonemes) in the language

The researchers found that the more complex the writing system was - with more graphemes and less predictable spelling - the worse the ASR model performed. However, the complexity of the sound system, as measured by the number of phonemes, did not seem to impact ASR accuracy very much.

This suggests that the design of the writing system is a critical factor in how well ASR models can understand and transcribe speech, even more so than the underlying sound system of the language. Developing methods to model orthographic variation may be an important avenue for improving ASR, especially for languages with complex writing systems.

Technical Explanation

The researchers started by fine-tuning the Wav2Vec2-XLSR-53 model, a strong multilingual self-supervised speech recognition model, on 25 languages spanning 15 different writing systems. This allowed them to collect ASR accuracy data across a diverse set of languages.

They then analyzed the relationship between the ASR accuracy and several linguistic factors for each language:

Number of graphemes: The total number of distinct letters or characters in the writing system.
Grapheme entropy: A measure of how predictable and structured the writing system is, based on the frequency distribution of graphemes.
Logographicity: How much information about whole words or word parts is encoded directly in the writing system, rather than just individual sounds.
Number of phonemes: The total number of distinct speech sounds in the language.

The results showed that the orthographic complexity factors - grapheme count and grapheme entropy - had a significant negative correlation with the ASR accuracy. In other words, writing systems with more characters and less predictable spellings tended to result in lower performance for the speech recognition model.

In contrast, the phonological complexity factor of phoneme count did not have a significant correlation with ASR accuracy. This suggests that the design of the writing system may be a more critical factor for ASR performance than the underlying sound system of the language.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into how linguistic factors can impact the capabilities of ASR models. The finding that orthographic complexity plays a more significant role than phonological complexity is an interesting and somewhat counterintuitive result.

However, the study is limited to a relatively small sample size of 25 languages. While the languages span a diverse range of writing systems, it would be helpful to validate these findings on a larger and more comprehensive dataset of languages. Phonologybench, a recent benchmark for evaluating phonological skills in language models, could be a useful resource for expanding this analysis.

Additionally, the paper does not explore potential interactions or compensatory effects between orthographic and phonological factors. It's possible that the impact of orthographic complexity could be mitigated by certain phonological properties, or vice versa. Further research into these potential relationships could provide a more nuanced understanding of how linguistic factors affect ASR performance.

Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to our understanding of the linguistic challenges faced by ASR systems. Continued research in this area could lead to more robust and adaptable speech recognition models, particularly for languages with complex writing systems.

Conclusion

This study investigates how the complexity of a language's writing system and sound system impact the performance of automatic speech recognition (ASR) models. The key finding is that orthographic complexity, such as the number of letters and the unpredictability of the spelling, has a significant negative effect on ASR accuracy, while phonological complexity does not show the same relationship.

This suggests that the design of the writing system is a critical factor for ASR performance, even more so than the underlying sound system of the language. Developing methods to better model orthographic variation may be an important avenue for improving ASR, especially for languages with complex writing systems.

The results provide valuable insights into the linguistic challenges faced by speech recognition technologies. Continued research in this area could lead to more robust and adaptable ASR systems that can handle the diverse range of writing systems and sound systems found across the world's languages.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Language Complexity and Speech Recognition Accuracy: Orthographic Complexity Hurts, Phonological Complexity Doesn't

Chihiro Taguchi, David Chiang

We investigate what linguistic factors affect the performance of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) models. We hypothesize that orthographic and phonological complexities both degrade accuracy. To examine this, we fine-tune the multilingual self-supervised pretrained model Wav2Vec2-XLSR-53 on 25 languages with 15 writing systems, and we compare their ASR accuracy, number of graphemes, unigram grapheme entropy, logographicity (how much word/morpheme-level information is encoded in the writing system), and number of phonemes. The results demonstrate that orthographic complexities significantly correlate with low ASR accuracy, while phonological complexity shows no significant correlation.

6/14/2024

Correlation Does Not Imply Compensation: Complexity and Irregularity in the Lexicon

Amanda Doucette, Ryan Cotterell, Morgan Sonderegger, Timothy J. O'Donnell

It has been claimed that within a language, morphologically irregular words are more likely to be phonotactically simple and morphologically regular words are more likely to be phonotactically complex. This inverse correlation has been demonstrated in English for a small sample of words, but has yet to be shown for a larger sample of languages. Furthermore, frequency and word length are known to influence both phonotactic complexity and morphological irregularity, and they may be confounding factors in this relationship. Therefore, we examine the relationships between all pairs of these four variables both to assess the robustness of previous findings using improved methodology and as a step towards understanding the underlying causal relationship. Using information-theoretic measures of phonotactic complexity and morphological irregularity (Pimentel et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2019) on 25 languages from UniMorph, we find that there is evidence of a positive relationship between morphological irregularity and phonotactic complexity within languages on average, although the direction varies within individual languages. We also find weak evidence of a negative relationship between word length and morphological irregularity that had not been previously identified, and that some existing findings about the relationships between these four variables are not as robust as previously thought.

6/11/2024

Modeling Orthographic Variation Improves NLP Performance for Nigerian Pidgin

Pin-Jie Lin, Merel Scholman, Muhammed Saeed, Vera Demberg

Nigerian Pidgin is an English-derived contact language and is traditionally an oral language, spoken by approximately 100 million people. No orthographic standard has yet been adopted, and thus the few available Pidgin datasets that exist are characterised by noise in the form of orthographic variations. This contributes to under-performance of models in critical NLP tasks. The current work is the first to describe various types of orthographic variations commonly found in Nigerian Pidgin texts, and model this orthographic variation. The variations identified in the dataset form the basis of a phonetic-theoretic framework for word editing, which is used to generate orthographic variations to augment training data. We test the effect of this data augmentation on two critical NLP tasks: machine translation and sentiment analysis. The proposed variation generation framework augments the training data with new orthographic variants which are relevant for the test set but did not occur in the training set originally. Our results demonstrate the positive effect of augmenting the training data with a combination of real texts from other corpora as well as synthesized orthographic variation, resulting in performance improvements of 2.1 points in sentiment analysis and 1.4 BLEU points in translation to English.

4/30/2024

PhonologyBench: Evaluating Phonological Skills of Large Language Models

Ashima Suvarna, Harshita Khandelwal, Nanyun Peng

Phonology, the study of speech's structure and pronunciation rules, is a critical yet often overlooked component in Large Language Model (LLM) research. LLMs are widely used in various downstream applications that leverage phonology such as educational tools and poetry generation. Moreover, LLMs can potentially learn imperfect associations between orthographic and phonological forms from the training data. Thus, it is imperative to benchmark the phonological skills of LLMs. To this end, we present PhonologyBench, a novel benchmark consisting of three diagnostic tasks designed to explicitly test the phonological skills of LLMs in English: grapheme-to-phoneme conversion, syllable counting, and rhyme word generation. Despite having no access to speech data, LLMs showcased notable performance on the PhonologyBench tasks. However, we observe a significant gap of 17% and 45% on Rhyme Word Generation and Syllable counting, respectively, when compared to humans. Our findings underscore the importance of studying LLM performance on phonological tasks that inadvertently impact real-world applications. Furthermore, we encourage researchers to choose LLMs that perform well on the phonological task that is closely related to the downstream application since we find that no single model consistently outperforms the others on all the tasks.

4/8/2024