Correlation Does Not Imply Compensation: Complexity and Irregularity in the Lexicon
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the relationship between complexity and irregularity in the lexicon, challenging the assumption that more complex language systems necessarily lead to greater regularity.
- The authors analyze large-scale datasets of lexical information and find that complexity and irregularity can co-exist in natural language, contradicting the common belief that complexity implies compensation through regularity.
- The findings have implications for understanding the evolution and structure of human language, as well as the design of natural language processing systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines the relationship between how complex a language is and how regular or irregular its words and word structures are. The common belief is that more complex language systems should lead to greater regularity, as the system "compensates" for the increased complexity.
However, the researchers analyzed large datasets of word information and found that complexity and irregularity can actually coexist in natural languages. This challenges the conventional wisdom that complexity must go hand-in-hand with regularity.
These findings are significant for understanding how human language has developed and is structured. They also have implications for designing artificial language systems, like those used in natural language processing, that aim to mimic the patterns and properties of real-world language.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the relationship between complexity and irregularity in the lexicon, or the full set of words in a language. The authors analyze large datasets of lexical information, including data on word frequency, morphological structure, and orthographic properties.
Their findings challenge the common assumption that more complex language systems should exhibit greater regularity as a form of "compensation." Instead, the data shows that complexity and irregularity can in fact co-occur, with highly complex lexical systems displaying significant irregularities in word forms and structures.
This suggests that the relationship between complexity and regularity in human language is more nuanced than previously thought. It has implications for theories of language evolution and acquisition, as well as the design of artificial language systems that aim to capture the properties of natural language.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful and well-designed investigation into the relationship between complexity and irregularity in language. The authors draw on a large, diverse set of lexical data to support their key claims, which strengthens the credibility of their findings.
That said, the study is limited to analyzing lexical properties and does not explore how complexity and irregularity may manifest in other linguistic domains, such as syntax or phonology. Additionally, while the authors discuss the implications of their work, they do not delve deeply into potential explanations for why complexity and irregularity can co-exist in natural language.
Further research could investigate these issues in more depth, as well as explore how the findings apply to other languages beyond the primary focus on English. Expanding the scope of the analysis could yield additional insights into the underlying mechanisms governing the structure and evolution of human language.
Conclusion
This paper challenges the common assumption that more complex language systems necessarily exhibit greater regularity as a form of compensation. Through a large-scale analysis of lexical data, the authors demonstrate that complexity and irregularity can in fact coexist in natural languages.
These findings have important implications for our understanding of how human language has developed and is structured, as well as the design of artificial language systems that aim to mimic the properties of real-world language. The research raises new questions about the relationship between complexity and regularity, opening up avenues for further exploration in the field of linguistics and language science.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Correlation Does Not Imply Compensation: Complexity and Irregularity in the Lexicon
Amanda Doucette, Ryan Cotterell, Morgan Sonderegger, Timothy J. O'Donnell
It has been claimed that within a language, morphologically irregular words are more likely to be phonotactically simple and morphologically regular words are more likely to be phonotactically complex. This inverse correlation has been demonstrated in English for a small sample of words, but has yet to be shown for a larger sample of languages. Furthermore, frequency and word length are known to influence both phonotactic complexity and morphological irregularity, and they may be confounding factors in this relationship. Therefore, we examine the relationships between all pairs of these four variables both to assess the robustness of previous findings using improved methodology and as a step towards understanding the underlying causal relationship. Using information-theoretic measures of phonotactic complexity and morphological irregularity (Pimentel et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2019) on 25 languages from UniMorph, we find that there is evidence of a positive relationship between morphological irregularity and phonotactic complexity within languages on average, although the direction varies within individual languages. We also find weak evidence of a negative relationship between word length and morphological irregularity that had not been previously identified, and that some existing findings about the relationships between these four variables are not as robust as previously thought.
Read more6/11/2024
🏋️
0
Using Letter Positional Probabilities to Assess Word Complexity
Michael Dalvean
Word complexity is defined in a number of different ways. Psycholinguistic, morphological and lexical proxies are often used. Human ratings are also used. The problem here is that these proxies do not measure complexity directly, and human ratings are susceptible to subjective bias. In this study we contend that some form of 'latent complexity' can be approximated by using samples of simple and complex words. We use a sample of 'simple' words from primary school picture books and a sample of 'complex' words from high school and academic settings. In order to analyse the differences between these classes, we look at the letter positional probabilities (LPPs). We find strong statistical associations between several LPPs and complexity. For example, simple words are significantly (p<.001) more likely to start with w, b, s, h, g, k, j, t, y or f, while complex words are significantly (p<.001) more likely to start with i, a, e, r, v, u or d. We find similar strong associations for subsequent letter positions, with 84 letter-position variables in the first 6 positions being significant at the p<.001 level. We then use LPPs as variables in creating a classifier which can classify the two classes with an 83% accuracy. We test these findings using a second data set, with 66 LPPs significant (p<.001) in the first 6 positions common to both datasets. We use these 66 variables to create a classifier that is able to classify a third dataset with an accuracy of 70%. Finally, we create a fourth sample by combining the extreme high and low scoring words generated by three classifiers built on the first three separate datasets and use this sample to build a classifier which has an accuracy of 97%. We use this to score the four levels of English word groups from an ESL program.
Read more5/1/2024
💬
0
Language Complexity and Speech Recognition Accuracy: Orthographic Complexity Hurts, Phonological Complexity Doesn't
Chihiro Taguchi, David Chiang
We investigate what linguistic factors affect the performance of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) models. We hypothesize that orthographic and phonological complexities both degrade accuracy. To examine this, we fine-tune the multilingual self-supervised pretrained model Wav2Vec2-XLSR-53 on 25 languages with 15 writing systems, and we compare their ASR accuracy, number of graphemes, unigram grapheme entropy, logographicity (how much word/morpheme-level information is encoded in the writing system), and number of phonemes. The results demonstrate that orthographic complexities significantly correlate with low ASR accuracy, while phonological complexity shows no significant correlation.
Read more6/14/2024
0
Revisiting the Phenomenon of Syntactic Complexity Convergence on German Dialogue Data
Yu Wang, Hendrik Buschmeier
We revisit the phenomenon of syntactic complexity convergence in conversational interaction, originally found for English dialogue, which has theoretical implication for dialogical concepts such as mutual understanding. We use a modified metric to quantify syntactic complexity based on dependency parsing. The results show that syntactic complexity convergence can be statistically confirmed in one of three selected German datasets that were analysed. Given that the dataset which shows such convergence is much larger than the other two selected datasets, the empirical results indicate a certain degree of linguistic generality of syntactic complexity convergence in conversational interaction. We also found a different type of syntactic complexity convergence in one of the datasets while further investigation is still necessary.
Read more8/23/2024