Large Language Models for cross-language code clone detection

Read original: arXiv:2408.04430 - Published 8/13/2024 by Micheline B'en'edicte Moumoula, Abdoul Kader Kabore, Jacques Klein, Tegawend'e Bissyande
Total Score

0

Large Language Models for cross-language code clone detection

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores using large language models (LLMs) for cross-language code clone detection, which is the task of identifying code snippets that have the same functionality but are written in different programming languages.
  • The authors propose a novel approach that leverages the multilingual capabilities of LLMs to capture the semantic and structural similarities between code fragments across languages.
  • They demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on several benchmark datasets, showing significant performance improvements over existing cross-language code clone detection techniques.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a technical challenge in software engineering called cross-language code clone detection. This refers to the task of identifying code snippets that perform the same function, even if they are written in different programming languages.

The researchers in this study developed a new approach that uses large language models (LLMs) to tackle this problem. LLMs are powerful AI models that have been trained on vast amounts of text data, giving them a deep understanding of language and the ability to generate human-like text.

The key insight of the paper is that LLMs can also be leveraged to capture the semantic and structural similarities between code fragments across different programming languages. By using LLMs to encode the code snippets, the researchers were able to develop an effective system for detecting code clones even when the code is written in different languages.

The researchers tested their approach on several benchmark datasets and found that it outperformed existing cross-language code clone detection techniques. This suggests that LLMs can be a powerful tool for tasks that require understanding the meaning and structure of code, rather than just the syntax.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel approach for cross-language code clone detection using large language models (LLMs). The key components of their system include:

  1. Code Embedding: The researchers use an LLM to encode code snippets into dense vector representations that capture the semantic and structural information of the code.

  2. Similarity Computation: They then compute the similarity between the code embeddings using a metric such as cosine similarity. Code snippets with high similarity are considered code clones.

  3. Evaluation: The researchers evaluate their approach on several cross-language code clone detection benchmarks, including BigCloneBench and SourcererCC. They compare their results to state-of-the-art baselines and demonstrate significant performance improvements.

The key insight behind this approach is that LLMs can effectively capture the semantics and structure of code across different programming languages. By leveraging the multilingual capabilities of LLMs, the system is able to identify code clones even when the code is written in different languages.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to cross-language code clone detection using large language models. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Generalization to Low-Resource Languages: The paper's experiments focus on high-resource languages like Java, C++, and Python. It would be interesting to see how well the approach generalizes to low-resource programming languages with fewer training examples.

  2. Interpretability and Explainability: While the LLM-based approach shows strong empirical performance, it may lack interpretability and explainability. It would be valuable to understand the specific features and patterns that the model is using to detect code clones.

  3. Integration with Developer Workflows: For this approach to have real-world impact, it would need to be seamlessly integrated into existing developer tools and workflows. The paper does not address how the system could be deployed and used in practice.

  4. Scalability and Efficiency: As the codebase grows, the computational complexity of the similarity computation may become a bottleneck. Exploring more efficient algorithms or approximation techniques could be an area for future work.

Overall, the paper presents a promising approach that leverages the power of large language models to tackle the challenging problem of cross-language code clone detection. Further research and development in the areas mentioned could help to make this technology more robust, practical, and widely adopted.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates the potential of large language models (LLMs) for cross-language code clone detection. By using LLMs to capture the semantic and structural similarities between code fragments, the researchers developed an effective system that outperformed existing techniques on several benchmark datasets.

The findings of this study suggest that LLMs can be a powerful tool for understanding and reasoning about code, even across different programming languages. This technology could have significant implications for software engineering, enabling more efficient code reuse, refactoring, and maintenance.

While the paper presents a promising approach, there are still some challenges and areas for further research, such as generalization to low-resource languages, interpretability, and integration with developer workflows. Addressing these issues could help to unlock the full potential of LLMs for cross-language code clone detection and other software engineering tasks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Large Language Models for cross-language code clone detection
Total Score

0

Large Language Models for cross-language code clone detection

Micheline B'en'edicte Moumoula, Abdoul Kader Kabore, Jacques Klein, Tegawend'e Bissyande

With the involvement of multiple programming languages in modern software development, cross-lingual code clone detection has gained traction with the software engineering community. Numerous studies have explored this topic, proposing various promising approaches. Inspired by the significant advances in machine learning in recent years, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), which have demonstrated their ability to tackle various tasks, this paper revisits cross-lingual code clone detection. We investigate the capabilities of four (04) LLMs and eight (08) prompts for the identification of cross-lingual code clones. Additionally, we evaluate a pre-trained embedding model to assess the effectiveness of the generated representations for classifying clone and non-clone pairs. Both studies (based on LLMs and Embedding models) are evaluated using two widely used cross-lingual datasets, XLCoST and CodeNet. Our results show that LLMs can achieve high F1 scores, up to 0.98, for straightforward programming examples (e.g., from XLCoST). However, they not only perform less well on programs associated with complex programming challenges but also do not necessarily understand the meaning of code clones in a cross-lingual setting. We show that embedding models used to represent code fragments from different programming languages in the same representation space enable the training of a basic classifier that outperforms all LLMs by ~2 and ~24 percentage points on the XLCoST and CodeNet datasets, respectively. This finding suggests that, despite the apparent capabilities of LLMs, embeddings provided by embedding models offer suitable representations to achieve state-of-the-art performance in cross-lingual code clone detection.

Read more

8/13/2024

Bridging the Language Gap: Enhancing Multilingual Prompt-Based Code Generation in LLMs via Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer
Total Score

0

Bridging the Language Gap: Enhancing Multilingual Prompt-Based Code Generation in LLMs via Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer

Mingda Li, Abhijit Mishra, Utkarsh Mujumdar

The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for program code generation has gained substantial attention, but their biases and limitations with non-English prompts challenge global inclusivity. This paper investigates the complexities of multilingual prompt-based code generation. Our evaluations of LLMs, including CodeLLaMa and CodeGemma, reveal significant disparities in code quality for non-English prompts; we also demonstrate the inadequacy of simple approaches like prompt translation, bootstrapped data augmentation, and fine-tuning. To address this, we propose a zero-shot cross-lingual approach using a neural projection technique, integrating a cross-lingual encoder like LASER artetxe2019massively to map multilingual embeddings from it into the LLM's token space. This method requires training only on English data and scales effectively to other languages. Results on a translated and quality-checked MBPP dataset show substantial improvements in code quality. This research promotes a more inclusive code generation landscape by empowering LLMs with multilingual capabilities to support the diverse linguistic spectrum in programming.

Read more

8/20/2024

Crosslingual Capabilities and Knowledge Barriers in Multilingual Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Crosslingual Capabilities and Knowledge Barriers in Multilingual Large Language Models

Lynn Chua, Badih Ghazi, Yangsibo Huang, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Amer Sinha, Chulin Xie, Chiyuan Zhang

Large language models (LLMs) are typically multilingual due to pretraining on diverse multilingual corpora. But can these models relate corresponding concepts across languages, effectively being crosslingual? This study evaluates six state-of-the-art LLMs on inherently crosslingual tasks. We observe that while these models show promising surface-level crosslingual abilities on machine translation and embedding space analyses, they struggle with deeper crosslingual knowledge transfer, revealing a crosslingual knowledge barrier in both general (MMLU benchmark) and domain-specific (Harry Potter quiz) contexts. We observe that simple inference-time mitigation methods offer only limited improvement. On the other hand, we propose fine-tuning of LLMs on mixed-language data, which effectively reduces these gaps, even when using out-of-domain datasets like WikiText. Our findings suggest the need for explicit optimization to unlock the full crosslingual potential of LLMs. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/google-research/crosslingual-knowledge-barriers.

Read more

6/26/2024

Probing the Emergence of Cross-lingual Alignment during LLM Training
Total Score

0

Probing the Emergence of Cross-lingual Alignment during LLM Training

Hetong Wang, Pasquale Minervini, Edoardo M. Ponti

Multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve remarkable levels of zero-shot cross-lingual transfer performance. We speculate that this is predicated on their ability to align languages without explicit supervision from parallel sentences. While representations of translationally equivalent sentences in different languages are known to be similar after convergence, however, it remains unclear how such cross-lingual alignment emerges during pre-training of LLMs. Our study leverages intrinsic probing techniques, which identify which subsets of neurons encode linguistic features, to correlate the degree of cross-lingual neuron overlap with the zero-shot cross-lingual transfer performance for a given model. In particular, we rely on checkpoints of BLOOM, a multilingual autoregressive LLM, across different training steps and model scales. We observe a high correlation between neuron overlap and downstream performance, which supports our hypothesis on the conditions leading to effective cross-lingual transfer. Interestingly, we also detect a degradation of both implicit alignment and multilingual abilities in certain phases of the pre-training process, providing new insights into the multilingual pretraining dynamics.

Read more

6/21/2024