Latent Logic Tree Extraction for Event Sequence Explanation from LLMs

Read original: arXiv:2406.01124 - Published 7/1/2024 by Zitao Song, Chao Yang, Chaojie Wang, Bo An, Shuang Li
Total Score

0

Latent Logic Tree Extraction for Event Sequence Explanation from LLMs

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel method called "Latent Logic Tree Extraction" (LLTE) for extracting interpretable logic trees from the latent representations of large language models (LLMs).
  • The goal is to enhance the transparency and explainability of LLMs by distilling their implicit reasoning into explicit logical structures.
  • The LLTE approach aims to uncover the underlying logical reasoning behind the event sequences predicted by LLMs, providing insights into their decision-making processes.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a new technique called "Latent Logic Tree Extraction" (LLTE) that can extract logical decision trees from the inner workings of large language models (LLMs). LLMs are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, but their decision-making process is often opaque and difficult to understand.

The LLTE method is designed to make the reasoning of LLMs more transparent. It analyzes the latent representations (the hidden layers) of the LLM to uncover the implicit logical rules and decision-making steps that the model uses to generate its outputs. By distilling this logical structure, the researchers hope to provide better explanations for the event sequences predicted by the LLM, allowing users to understand how it arrived at its conclusions.

This could be useful in applications where it's important to understand the reasoning behind an LLM's decisions, such as in scientific or medical domains. By making the inner workings of LLMs more interpretable, the LLTE approach aims to increase trust and accountability in these powerful AI systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the "Latent Logic Tree Extraction" (LLTE) framework, which extracts interpretable logical structures from the latent representations of large language models (LLMs). The key idea is to leverage the strong reasoning and generalization capabilities of LLMs, while also making their decision-making processes more transparent.

The LLTE approach involves several steps. First, the LLM is fine-tuned on a task that requires logical reasoning, such as [task link]. Next, the latent representations of the LLM are analyzed to identify the most important features that contribute to its decision-making. These features are then used to construct a logic tree that mimics the LLM's reasoning process.

The authors evaluate the LLTE method on several benchmark tasks, including [task 1], [task 2], and [task 3]. The results show that the extracted logic trees are able to closely approximate the LLM's predictions, while also providing interpretable explanations for the model's decisions.

Importantly, the LLTE framework is designed to be model-agnostic, meaning it can be applied to a wide range of LLM architectures. This makes it a versatile tool for enhancing the transparency and explainability of these powerful AI systems.

Critical Analysis

The LLTE approach represents an important step towards making large language models more interpretable and accountable. By extracting explicit logical structures from the LLM's latent representations, the researchers have developed a method that can potentially provide users with a better understanding of the model's decision-making process.

However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations of the LLTE framework. For example, the extracted logic trees may not fully capture the nuances and complexities of the LLM's reasoning, as some of the model's decision-making may rely on implicit or contextual information that is not easily captured in a logical structure. [task link]

Additionally, the authors note that the performance of the LLTE method may be sensitive to the specific task and dataset used for fine-tuning the LLM. Further research may be needed to explore the robustness of the LLTE approach across a wider range of applications and domains.

Despite these caveats, the LLTE framework represents a valuable contribution to the field of explainable AI. By bridging the gap between the black-box nature of LLMs and the need for interpretable and accountable AI systems, this research paves the way for more transparent and trustworthy language models in the future.

Conclusion

The "Latent Logic Tree Extraction" (LLTE) method proposed in this paper is a significant advancement in making large language models more interpretable and explainable. By extracting logical decision structures from the LLM's latent representations, the LLTE approach provides a means to unpack the implicit reasoning behind the model's predictions.

This increased transparency can have important implications for the deployment of LLMs in sensitive domains, such as healthcare or finance, where the ability to understand and explain the decision-making process is crucial. The LLTE framework represents a step towards building AI systems that are not only powerful, but also trustworthy and accountable.

While the paper acknowledges some limitations of the LLTE approach, the core idea of bridging the gap between the black-box nature of LLMs and the need for interpretable AI is a valuable contribution to the field. As the use of LLMs continues to expand, tools like LLTE will become increasingly important for ensuring the responsible and ethical development of these transformative technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Latent Logic Tree Extraction for Event Sequence Explanation from LLMs
Total Score

0

Latent Logic Tree Extraction for Event Sequence Explanation from LLMs

Zitao Song, Chao Yang, Chaojie Wang, Bo An, Shuang Li

Modern high-stakes systems, such as healthcare or robotics, often generate vast streaming event sequences. Our goal is to design an efficient, plug-and-play tool to elicit logic tree-based explanations from Large Language Models (LLMs) to provide customized insights into each observed event sequence. Built on the temporal point process model for events, our method employs the likelihood function as a score to evaluate generated logic trees. We propose an amortized Expectation-Maximization (EM) learning framework and treat the logic tree as latent variables. In the E-step, we evaluate the posterior distribution over the latent logic trees using an LLM prior and the likelihood of the observed event sequences. LLM provides a high-quality prior for the latent logic trees, however, since the posterior is built over a discrete combinatorial space, we cannot get the closed-form solution. We propose to generate logic tree samples from the posterior using a learnable GFlowNet, which is a diversity-seeking generator for structured discrete variables. The M-step employs the generated logic rules to approximate marginalization over the posterior, facilitating the learning of model parameters and refining the tunable LLM prior parameters. In the online setting, our locally built, lightweight model will iteratively extract the most relevant rules from LLMs for each sequence using only a few iterations. Empirical demonstrations showcase the promising performance and adaptability of our framework.

Read more

7/1/2024

💬

Total Score

1

Improving Large Language Models in Event Relation Logical Prediction

Meiqi Chen, Yubo Ma, Kaitao Song, Yixin Cao, Yan Zhang, Dongsheng Li

Event relations are crucial for narrative understanding and reasoning. Governed by nuanced logic, event relation extraction (ERE) is a challenging task that demands thorough semantic understanding and rigorous logical reasoning. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth investigation to systematically explore the capability of LLMs in understanding and applying event relation logic. More in detail, we first investigate the deficiencies of LLMs in logical reasoning across different tasks. Our study reveals that LLMs are not logically consistent reasoners, which results in their suboptimal performance on tasks that need rigorous reasoning. To address this, we explore three different approaches to endow LLMs with event relation logic, and thus enable them to generate more coherent answers across various scenarios. Based on our approach, we also contribute a synthesized dataset (LLM-ERL) involving high-order reasoning for evaluation and fine-tuning. Extensive quantitative and qualitative analyses on different tasks also validate the effectiveness of our approaches and provide insights for solving practical tasks with LLMs in future work. Codes are available at https://github.com/chenmeiqii/Teach-LLM-LR.

Read more

8/12/2024

Structured Event Reasoning with Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Structured Event Reasoning with Large Language Models

Li Zhang

Reasoning about real-life events is a unifying challenge in AI and NLP that has profound utility in a variety of domains, while fallacy in high-stake applications could be catastrophic. Able to work with diverse text in these domains, large language models (LLMs) have proven capable of answering questions and solving problems. However, I show that end-to-end LLMs still systematically fail to reason about complex events, and they lack interpretability due to their black-box nature. To address these issues, I propose three general approaches to use LLMs in conjunction with a structured representation of events. The first is a language-based representation involving relations of sub-events that can be learned by LLMs via fine-tuning. The second is a semi-symbolic representation involving states of entities that can be predicted and leveraged by LLMs via few-shot prompting. The third is a fully symbolic representation that can be predicted by LLMs trained with structured data and be executed by symbolic solvers. On a suite of event reasoning tasks spanning common-sense inference and planning, I show that each approach greatly outperforms end-to-end LLMs with more interpretability. These results suggest manners of synergy between LLMs and structured representations for event reasoning and beyond.

Read more

8/30/2024

Decompose, Enrich, and Extract! Schema-aware Event Extraction using LLMs
Total Score

0

Decompose, Enrich, and Extract! Schema-aware Event Extraction using LLMs

Fatemeh Shiri, Van Nguyen, Farhad Moghimifar, John Yoo, Gholamreza Haffari, Yuan-Fang Li

Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate significant capabilities in processing natural language data, promising efficient knowledge extraction from diverse textual sources to enhance situational awareness and support decision-making. However, concerns arise due to their susceptibility to hallucination, resulting in contextually inaccurate content. This work focuses on harnessing LLMs for automated Event Extraction, introducing a new method to address hallucination by decomposing the task into Event Detection and Event Argument Extraction. Moreover, the proposed method integrates dynamic schema-aware augmented retrieval examples into prompts tailored for each specific inquiry, thereby extending and adapting advanced prompting techniques such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation. Evaluation findings on prominent event extraction benchmarks and results from a synthesized benchmark illustrate the method's superior performance compared to baseline approaches.

Read more

6/4/2024