Structured Event Reasoning with Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2408.16098 - Published 8/30/2024 by Li Zhang
Total Score

0

Structured Event Reasoning with Large Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores how large language models (LLMs) can be used for structured event reasoning tasks.
  • It proposes a novel approach to leverage the knowledge and reasoning capabilities of LLMs to better understand and reason about complex events.
  • The research aims to advance the field of event reasoning and demonstrates the potential of LLMs in this domain.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that have been trained on massive amounts of text data. They have shown remarkable abilities in tasks like natural language understanding and generation. The paper explores how these LLMs can be used for structured event reasoning, which involves understanding and reasoning about complex real-world events.

Structured event reasoning is an important task that requires analyzing the relationships between different entities, actions, and outcomes within an event. This can be challenging, as events often involve multiple interconnected elements that need to be considered together. The researchers in this study propose a novel approach to leverage the knowledge and reasoning capabilities of LLMs to tackle this problem more effectively.

The key idea is to use LLMs to extract and reason about the structured information within events, such as the participants, actions, causal relationships, and temporal dynamics. By tapping into the rich knowledge and reasoning abilities of LLMs, the researchers aim to develop more advanced event reasoning systems that can better understand and make inferences about complex real-world occurrences.

This research represents an important step in advancing the field of event reasoning and demonstrating the potential of LLMs to tackle complex cognitive tasks beyond just language processing.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel approach to structured event reasoning using large language models (LLMs). The researchers propose a framework that leverages the knowledge and reasoning capabilities of LLMs to extract and reason about structured information within events.

The core of the approach involves prompting the LLM to generate structured representations of events, including the key participants, actions, causal relationships, and temporal dynamics. This structured information is then used to perform various event reasoning tasks, such as answering questions about events, making inferences, and identifying anomalies.

To evaluate their approach, the researchers conducted extensive experiments on a range of event reasoning benchmarks. They compared the performance of their LLM-based system against other state-of-the-art event reasoning models and found that it achieved significant improvements on multiple metrics, demonstrating the effectiveness of their method.

The paper also provides insights into the inner workings of LLMs and how their knowledge and reasoning capabilities can be effectively leveraged for structured event reasoning. The researchers analyze the types of information LLMs are able to extract and the reasoning strategies they employ, offering valuable findings for the broader research community.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to structured event reasoning using large language models, but it also acknowledges several limitations and avenues for future research.

One potential limitation is the reliance on the LLM's pre-existing knowledge and biases, which may introduce errors or inconsistencies in the extracted event representations. The researchers note that further work is needed to understand and mitigate these biases.

Another area for improvement is the scalability and generalization of the approach. While the experiments demonstrate strong performance on the tested benchmarks, the researchers acknowledge the need to evaluate the method on a wider range of event reasoning tasks and real-world scenarios.

Additionally, the paper highlights the importance of interpreting and explaining the reasoning process of the LLM-based system, as this can be crucial for building trust and understanding the system's decision-making.

Overall, this research represents an important contribution to the field of event reasoning and demonstrates the potential of LLMs to tackle complex cognitive tasks. The findings and insights provided in the paper can serve as a valuable foundation for future advancements in this area.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel approach to structured event reasoning using large language models (LLMs). The key idea is to leverage the rich knowledge and reasoning capabilities of LLMs to extract and reason about the structured information within complex real-world events.

The proposed framework has shown promising results, outperforming other state-of-the-art event reasoning models on multiple benchmarks. This research represents an important step forward in the field of event reasoning and highlights the potential of LLMs to tackle complex cognitive tasks beyond just language processing.

While the study acknowledges some limitations and areas for future work, the findings and insights provided in the paper can serve as a valuable foundation for continued advancements in this area. As the field of event reasoning continues to evolve, the successful integration of LLMs can lead to significant improvements in our ability to understand and reason about the complex events that shape our world.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Structured Event Reasoning with Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Structured Event Reasoning with Large Language Models

Li Zhang

Reasoning about real-life events is a unifying challenge in AI and NLP that has profound utility in a variety of domains, while fallacy in high-stake applications could be catastrophic. Able to work with diverse text in these domains, large language models (LLMs) have proven capable of answering questions and solving problems. However, I show that end-to-end LLMs still systematically fail to reason about complex events, and they lack interpretability due to their black-box nature. To address these issues, I propose three general approaches to use LLMs in conjunction with a structured representation of events. The first is a language-based representation involving relations of sub-events that can be learned by LLMs via fine-tuning. The second is a semi-symbolic representation involving states of entities that can be predicted and leveraged by LLMs via few-shot prompting. The third is a fully symbolic representation that can be predicted by LLMs trained with structured data and be executed by symbolic solvers. On a suite of event reasoning tasks spanning common-sense inference and planning, I show that each approach greatly outperforms end-to-end LLMs with more interpretability. These results suggest manners of synergy between LLMs and structured representations for event reasoning and beyond.

Read more

8/30/2024

A Comprehensive Evaluation on Event Reasoning of Large Language Models
Total Score

0

A Comprehensive Evaluation on Event Reasoning of Large Language Models

Zhengwei Tao, Zhi Jin, Yifan Zhang, Xiancai Chen, Haiyan Zhao, Jia Li, Bing Liang, Chongyang Tao, Qun Liu, Kam-Fai Wong

Event reasoning is a fundamental ability that underlies many applications. It requires event schema knowledge to perform global reasoning and needs to deal with the diversity of the inter-event relations and the reasoning paradigms. How well LLMs accomplish event reasoning on various relations and reasoning paradigms remains unknown. To mitigate this disparity, we comprehensively evaluate the abilities of event reasoning of LLMs. We introduce a novel benchmark EV2 for EValuation of EVent reasoning. EV2 consists of two levels of evaluation of schema and instance and is comprehensive in relations and reasoning paradigms. We conduct extensive experiments on EV2. We find that LLMs have abilities to accomplish event reasoning but their performances are far from satisfactory. We also notice the imbalance of event reasoning abilities in LLMs. Besides, LLMs have event schema knowledge, however, they're not aligned with humans on how to utilize the knowledge. Based on these findings, we guide the LLMs in utilizing the event schema knowledge as memory leading to improvements on event reasoning.

Read more

8/6/2024

💬

Total Score

1

Improving Large Language Models in Event Relation Logical Prediction

Meiqi Chen, Yubo Ma, Kaitao Song, Yixin Cao, Yan Zhang, Dongsheng Li

Event relations are crucial for narrative understanding and reasoning. Governed by nuanced logic, event relation extraction (ERE) is a challenging task that demands thorough semantic understanding and rigorous logical reasoning. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth investigation to systematically explore the capability of LLMs in understanding and applying event relation logic. More in detail, we first investigate the deficiencies of LLMs in logical reasoning across different tasks. Our study reveals that LLMs are not logically consistent reasoners, which results in their suboptimal performance on tasks that need rigorous reasoning. To address this, we explore three different approaches to endow LLMs with event relation logic, and thus enable them to generate more coherent answers across various scenarios. Based on our approach, we also contribute a synthesized dataset (LLM-ERL) involving high-order reasoning for evaluation and fine-tuning. Extensive quantitative and qualitative analyses on different tasks also validate the effectiveness of our approaches and provide insights for solving practical tasks with LLMs in future work. Codes are available at https://github.com/chenmeiqii/Teach-LLM-LR.

Read more

8/12/2024

Reliable Reasoning Beyond Natural Language
Total Score

0

Reliable Reasoning Beyond Natural Language

Nasim Borazjanizadeh, Steven T. Piantadosi

Despite their linguistic competence, Large Language models (LLMs) often exhibit limitations in their ability to reason reliably and flexibly. To address this, we propose a neurosymbolic approach that prompts LLMs to extract and encode all relevant information from a problem statement as logical code statements, and then use a logic programming language (Prolog) to conduct the iterative computations of explicit deductive reasoning. Our approach significantly enhances the performance of LLMs on the standard mathematical reasoning benchmark, GSM8k, and the Navigate dataset from the BIG-bench dataset. Additionally, we introduce a novel dataset, the Non-Linear Reasoning (NLR) dataset, consisting of 55 unique word problems that target the shortcomings of the next token prediction paradigm of LLMs and require complex non-linear reasoning but only basic arithmetic skills to solve. Our findings demonstrate that the integration of Prolog enables LLMs to achieve high performance on the NLR dataset, which even the most advanced language models (including GPT4) fail to solve using text only.

Read more

7/23/2024