Improving Large Language Models in Event Relation Logical Prediction

Read original: arXiv:2310.09158 - Published 8/12/2024 by Meiqi Chen, Yubo Ma, Kaitao Song, Yixin Cao, Yan Zhang, Dongsheng Li
Total Score

1

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Event relations are crucial for understanding and reasoning about narratives.
  • Extracting event relations is a challenging task that requires deep semantic understanding and logical reasoning.
  • This paper investigates the ability of large language models (LLMs) to understand and apply event relation logic.

Plain English Explanation

Event relations are the connections between different events in a story or narrative. Understanding these relationships is crucial for comprehending the overall meaning and flow of a narrative. However, extracting event relations is a complex task that demands a thorough understanding of the semantics and logical reasoning behind the events.

In this paper, the researchers explore the capability of large language models (LLMs) to handle event relation logic. LLMs are powerful AI systems that can process and generate human-like text, but the researchers find that they struggle with consistent logical reasoning. This can lead to suboptimal performance on tasks that require rigorous reasoning, such as extracting event relations.

To address this issue, the researchers explore three different approaches to endow LLMs with event relation logic. By incorporating this logical reasoning ability, the LLMs can generate more coherent and meaningful responses when dealing with event-based narratives and tasks. The researchers also contribute a new dataset, called LLM-ERL, which can be used for evaluating and fine-tuning LLMs on high-order reasoning tasks.

Technical Explanation

The paper first investigates the deficiencies of LLMs in logical reasoning across different tasks. The researchers find that LLMs are not logically consistent reasoners, which results in their suboptimal performance on tasks that require rigorous reasoning.

To address this, the researchers explore three different approaches to endow LLMs with event relation logic:

  1. Prompt Engineering: Designing prompts that explicitly guide the LLM to reason about event relations.
  2. Fine-tuning: Training the LLM on a dataset that focuses on event relation extraction, allowing it to learn the underlying logic.
  3. Neural Module: Incorporating a specialized neural module into the LLM architecture to handle event relation reasoning.

The researchers also contribute a new dataset, LLM-ERL, which involves high-order reasoning for evaluating and fine-tuning LLMs on event relation tasks. Extensive quantitative and qualitative analyses on different tasks validate the effectiveness of their approaches and provide insights for solving practical tasks with LLMs in the future.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough investigation into the limitations of LLMs in logical reasoning and proposes several approaches to address this issue. The researchers acknowledge that LLMs are not inherently designed for rigorous logical reasoning, which can hinder their performance on tasks that require such capabilities.

While the proposed approaches show promising results, it is important to note that they may not be a complete solution. The researchers mention that further research is needed to fully understand the extent of LLMs' logical reasoning abilities and to develop more robust techniques for incorporating logical reasoning into these models.

Additionally, the paper focuses on event relation extraction, but the challenges of logical reasoning in LLMs may extend to other areas of natural language processing. Exploring the implications of these findings in a broader context could provide valuable insights for the development of more advanced and versatile language models.

Conclusion

This paper presents an in-depth investigation into the challenges faced by large language models in understanding and applying event relation logic. The researchers explore several approaches to endow LLMs with the necessary logical reasoning capabilities, which can significantly improve their performance on tasks involving event-based narratives and high-order reasoning.

The proposed techniques and the LLM-ERL dataset contribute to the ongoing efforts to enhance the logical reasoning abilities of language models, ultimately aiming to develop more robust and capable AI systems that can better understand and reason about the world around them.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

1

Improving Large Language Models in Event Relation Logical Prediction

Meiqi Chen, Yubo Ma, Kaitao Song, Yixin Cao, Yan Zhang, Dongsheng Li

Event relations are crucial for narrative understanding and reasoning. Governed by nuanced logic, event relation extraction (ERE) is a challenging task that demands thorough semantic understanding and rigorous logical reasoning. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth investigation to systematically explore the capability of LLMs in understanding and applying event relation logic. More in detail, we first investigate the deficiencies of LLMs in logical reasoning across different tasks. Our study reveals that LLMs are not logically consistent reasoners, which results in their suboptimal performance on tasks that need rigorous reasoning. To address this, we explore three different approaches to endow LLMs with event relation logic, and thus enable them to generate more coherent answers across various scenarios. Based on our approach, we also contribute a synthesized dataset (LLM-ERL) involving high-order reasoning for evaluation and fine-tuning. Extensive quantitative and qualitative analyses on different tasks also validate the effectiveness of our approaches and provide insights for solving practical tasks with LLMs in future work. Codes are available at https://github.com/chenmeiqii/Teach-LLM-LR.

Read more

8/12/2024

Are LLMs Good Annotators for Discourse-level Event Relation Extraction?
Total Score

0

Are LLMs Good Annotators for Discourse-level Event Relation Extraction?

Kangda Wei, Aayush Gautam, Ruihong Huang

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated proficiency in a wide array of natural language processing tasks. However, its effectiveness over discourse-level event relation extraction (ERE) tasks remains unexplored. In this paper, we assess the effectiveness of LLMs in addressing discourse-level ERE tasks characterized by lengthy documents and intricate relations encompassing coreference, temporal, causal, and subevent types. Evaluation is conducted using an commercial model, GPT-3.5, and an open-source model, LLaMA-2. Our study reveals a notable underperformance of LLMs compared to the baseline established through supervised learning. Although Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) can improve LLMs performance, it does not scale well compared to the smaller supervised baseline model. Our quantitative and qualitative analysis shows that LLMs have several weaknesses when applied for extracting event relations, including a tendency to fabricate event mentions, and failures to capture transitivity rules among relations, detect long distance relations, or comprehend contexts with dense event mentions.

Read more

7/30/2024

Structured Event Reasoning with Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Structured Event Reasoning with Large Language Models

Li Zhang

Reasoning about real-life events is a unifying challenge in AI and NLP that has profound utility in a variety of domains, while fallacy in high-stake applications could be catastrophic. Able to work with diverse text in these domains, large language models (LLMs) have proven capable of answering questions and solving problems. However, I show that end-to-end LLMs still systematically fail to reason about complex events, and they lack interpretability due to their black-box nature. To address these issues, I propose three general approaches to use LLMs in conjunction with a structured representation of events. The first is a language-based representation involving relations of sub-events that can be learned by LLMs via fine-tuning. The second is a semi-symbolic representation involving states of entities that can be predicted and leveraged by LLMs via few-shot prompting. The third is a fully symbolic representation that can be predicted by LLMs trained with structured data and be executed by symbolic solvers. On a suite of event reasoning tasks spanning common-sense inference and planning, I show that each approach greatly outperforms end-to-end LLMs with more interpretability. These results suggest manners of synergy between LLMs and structured representations for event reasoning and beyond.

Read more

8/30/2024

A Comprehensive Evaluation on Event Reasoning of Large Language Models
Total Score

0

A Comprehensive Evaluation on Event Reasoning of Large Language Models

Zhengwei Tao, Zhi Jin, Yifan Zhang, Xiancai Chen, Haiyan Zhao, Jia Li, Bing Liang, Chongyang Tao, Qun Liu, Kam-Fai Wong

Event reasoning is a fundamental ability that underlies many applications. It requires event schema knowledge to perform global reasoning and needs to deal with the diversity of the inter-event relations and the reasoning paradigms. How well LLMs accomplish event reasoning on various relations and reasoning paradigms remains unknown. To mitigate this disparity, we comprehensively evaluate the abilities of event reasoning of LLMs. We introduce a novel benchmark EV2 for EValuation of EVent reasoning. EV2 consists of two levels of evaluation of schema and instance and is comprehensive in relations and reasoning paradigms. We conduct extensive experiments on EV2. We find that LLMs have abilities to accomplish event reasoning but their performances are far from satisfactory. We also notice the imbalance of event reasoning abilities in LLMs. Besides, LLMs have event schema knowledge, however, they're not aligned with humans on how to utilize the knowledge. Based on these findings, we guide the LLMs in utilizing the event schema knowledge as memory leading to improvements on event reasoning.

Read more

8/6/2024