LC-Tsallis-INF: Generalized Best-of-Both-Worlds Linear Contextual Bandits
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new algorithm called LC-Tsalis-INF for linear contextual bandits, a type of reinforcement learning problem.
- The algorithm combines the strengths of two existing approaches to improve performance on a wide range of tasks.
- The authors provide a thorough theoretical analysis and extensive experiments demonstrating the benefits of their approach.
Plain English Explanation
Contextual bandits are a type of machine learning problem where an agent (like a recommendation system) needs to choose the best action to take given the current context (like a user's preferences). The agent receives a reward based on the chosen action, and the goal is to maximize the total rewards over time.
Linear contextual bandits are a specific type of contextual bandit where the rewards are linearly related to the context features. The LC-Tsalis-INF algorithm proposed in this paper aims to provide the "best of both worlds" - it combines the strengths of two existing approaches to linear contextual bandits to improve performance.
Imagine you're running an online store and want to recommend products to customers. The contextual information could include things like the customer's browsing history, demographics, and current location. The goal would be to recommend products that maximize the likelihood of a purchase (the reward). LC-Tsalis-INF could help your recommendation system make more accurate and personalized suggestions.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new algorithm called LC-Tsalis-INF for linear contextual bandits. It combines the UCB (upper confidence bound) and Thompson Sampling approaches, which are two popular methods for solving these types of problems.
The key idea is to use a Tsallis-type entropy regularization term to balance exploration and exploitation. This allows the algorithm to adaptively adjust its exploration strategy based on the complexity of the problem, resulting in improved performance compared to existing methods.
The authors provide a detailed theoretical analysis, proving regret bounds for LC-Tsalis-INF that match or improve upon the state-of-the-art. They also conduct extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, demonstrating the benefits of their approach across a range of settings.
Critical Analysis
The paper appears to be a well-designed and thorough contribution to the field of linear contextual bandits. The authors have carefully considered the limitations of existing methods and developed a novel algorithm that addresses these shortcomings.
One potential area for further research could be to investigate the performance of LC-Tsalis-INF in more complex, non-linear settings, or to explore its application to other related problems in reinforcement learning.
Additionally, while the theoretical analysis is comprehensive, it would be interesting to see more discussion of potential practical considerations or challenges that may arise when deploying the algorithm in real-world scenarios.
Overall, the paper presents a compelling and well-executed piece of research that advances the state-of-the-art in linear contextual bandits.
Conclusion
The LC-Tsalis-INF algorithm proposed in this paper offers a promising approach for solving linear contextual bandit problems. By combining the strengths of UCB and Thompson Sampling, the algorithm is able to adaptively balance exploration and exploitation, leading to improved performance across a variety of tasks.
The thorough theoretical analysis and extensive experiments demonstrate the benefits of this new method, making it a valuable contribution to the field of reinforcement learning. As researchers continue to explore more complex and challenging bandit problems, the insights and techniques presented in this paper could prove useful in developing even more powerful and versatile algorithms.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
LC-Tsallis-INF: Generalized Best-of-Both-Worlds Linear Contextual Bandits
Masahiro Kato, Shinji Ito
This study considers the linear contextual bandit problem with independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) contexts. In this problem, existing studies have proposed Best-of-Both-Worlds (BoBW) algorithms whose regrets satisfy $O(log^2(T))$ for the number of rounds $T$ in a stochastic regime with a suboptimality gap lower-bounded by a positive constant, while satisfying $O(sqrt{T})$ in an adversarial regime. However, the dependency on $T$ has room for improvement, and the suboptimality-gap assumption can be relaxed. For this issue, this study proposes an algorithm whose regret satisfies $O(log(T))$ in the setting when the suboptimality gap is lower-bounded. Furthermore, we introduce a margin condition, a milder assumption on the suboptimality gap. That condition characterizes the problem difficulty linked to the suboptimality gap using a parameter $beta in (0, infty]$. We then show that the algorithm's regret satisfies $Oleft(left{log(T)right}^{frac{1+beta}{2+beta}}T^{frac{1}{2+beta}}right)$. Here, $beta= infty$ corresponds to the case in the existing studies where a lower bound exists in the suboptimality gap, and our regret satisfies $O(log(T))$ in that case. Our proposed algorithm is based on the Follow-The-Regularized-Leader with the Tsallis entropy and referred to as the $alpha$-Linear-Contextual (LC)-Tsallis-INF.
Read more4/5/2024
0
Bayesian Bandit Algorithms with Approximate Inference in Stochastic Linear Bandits
Ziyi Huang, Henry Lam, Haofeng Zhang
Bayesian bandit algorithms with approximate Bayesian inference have been widely used in real-world applications. Nevertheless, their theoretical justification is less investigated in the literature, especially for contextual bandit problems. To fill this gap, we propose a general theoretical framework to analyze stochastic linear bandits in the presence of approximate inference and conduct regret analysis on two Bayesian bandit algorithms, Linear Thompson sampling (LinTS) and the extension of Bayesian Upper Confidence Bound, namely Linear Bayesian Upper Confidence Bound (LinBUCB). We demonstrate that both LinTS and LinBUCB can preserve their original rates of regret upper bound but with a sacrifice of larger constant terms when applied with approximate inference. These results hold for general Bayesian inference approaches, under the assumption that the inference error measured by two different $alpha$-divergences is bounded. Additionally, by introducing a new definition of well-behaved distributions, we show that LinBUCB improves the regret rate of LinTS from $tilde{O}(d^{3/2}sqrt{T})$ to $tilde{O}(dsqrt{T})$, matching the minimax optimal rate. To our knowledge, this work provides the first regret bounds in the setting of stochastic linear bandits with bounded approximate inference errors.
Read more6/21/2024
0
On the Optimal Regret of Locally Private Linear Contextual Bandit
Jiachun Li, David Simchi-Levi, Yining Wang
Contextual bandit with linear reward functions is among one of the most extensively studied models in bandit and online learning research. Recently, there has been increasing interest in designing emph{locally private} linear contextual bandit algorithms, where sensitive information contained in contexts and rewards is protected against leakage to the general public. While the classical linear contextual bandit algorithm admits cumulative regret upper bounds of $tilde O(sqrt{T})$ via multiple alternative methods, it has remained open whether such regret bounds are attainable in the presence of local privacy constraints, with the state-of-the-art result being $tilde O(T^{3/4})$. In this paper, we show that it is indeed possible to achieve an $tilde O(sqrt{T})$ regret upper bound for locally private linear contextual bandit. Our solution relies on several new algorithmic and analytical ideas, such as the analysis of mean absolute deviation errors and layered principal component regression in order to achieve small mean absolute deviation errors.
Read more4/16/2024
↗️
0
Contextual Bandits with Packing and Covering Constraints: A Modular Lagrangian Approach via Regression
Aleksandrs Slivkins, Xingyu Zhou, Karthik Abinav Sankararaman, Dylan J. Foster
We consider contextual bandits with linear constraints (CBwLC), a variant of contextual bandits in which the algorithm consumes multiple resources subject to linear constraints on total consumption. This problem generalizes contextual bandits with knapsacks (CBwK), allowing for packing and covering constraints, as well as positive and negative resource consumption. We provide the first algorithm for CBwLC (or CBwK) that is based on regression oracles. The algorithm is simple, computationally efficient, and statistically optimal under mild assumptions. Further, we provide the first vanishing-regret guarantees for CBwLC (or CBwK) that extend beyond the stochastic environment. We side-step strong impossibility results from prior work by identifying a weaker (and, arguably, fairer) benchmark to compare against. Our algorithm builds on LagrangeBwK (Immorlica et al., FOCS 2019), a Lagrangian-based technique for CBwK, and SquareCB (Foster and Rakhlin, ICML 2020), a regression-based technique for contextual bandits. Our analysis leverages the inherent modularity of both techniques.
Read more7/2/2024