Learn Beyond The Answer: Training Language Models with Reflection for Mathematical Reasoning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach to training language models for mathematical reasoning tasks by incorporating a reflection mechanism.
- The authors propose a framework called "Learn Beyond The Answer" (LBTA) that encourages language models to reflect on their reasoning process and learn from their mistakes.
- LBTA is evaluated on various mathematical reasoning tasks and shows improved performance compared to standard language model training.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores a way to train language models to become better at mathematical reasoning. Traditional language models are often good at generating answers, but they don't always understand the reasoning behind those answers. The researchers developed a new approach called "Learn Beyond The Answer" (LBTA) that aims to get language models to not just spit out answers, but to reflect on their thought process and learn from their mistakes.
The key idea is that by getting the language model to reflect on its own reasoning, it can develop a deeper understanding of the mathematical concepts and improve its ability to solve problems. This is particularly useful for tasks like solving math word problems, where the model needs to understand the underlying logic and not just memorize solutions.
The researchers tested LBTA on a variety of math-related tasks and found that it outperformed standard language model training approaches. This suggests that incorporating reflection and introspection into the training process can be a promising direction for building more capable and reliable language models, especially for applications that require strong mathematical reasoning skills.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new framework called "Learn Beyond The Answer" (LBTA) for training language models to improve their mathematical reasoning abilities. LBTA incorporates a reflection mechanism that encourages the model to analyze its own thought process and learn from its mistakes.
The LBTA framework consists of two main components:
- Base Model: A standard language model that is trained to generate answers to mathematical reasoning problems.
- Reflection Model: An additional module that is trained to predict the step-by-step reasoning process used by the base model to arrive at the final answer.
During training, the base model generates an answer to a given problem, and the reflection model then tries to predict the intermediate steps the base model took to get to that answer. The base model is then updated not only based on the final answer, but also on how well the reflection model was able to capture the underlying reasoning.
The authors evaluate LBTA on a range of mathematical reasoning tasks, including math word problems, equation solving, and geometric reasoning. They compare LBTA to standard language model training approaches and find that the reflection mechanism leads to significant performance improvements on these tasks.
The authors also provide analysis and insights into how the reflection component helps the language model develop a deeper understanding of the mathematical concepts, allowing it to generalize better and handle more complex problems.
Critical Analysis
The "Learn Beyond The Answer" (LBTA) framework presented in this paper is a promising approach for training language models to improve their mathematical reasoning capabilities. By incorporating a reflection mechanism, the model is encouraged to not just focus on generating correct answers, but to also understand the underlying reasoning process.
One key strength of LBTA is that it can be applied to a wide range of mathematical reasoning tasks, from word problems to equation solving. This suggests the approach is general and not tied to a specific type of mathematical reasoning.
However, the paper does not fully address the potential limitations and challenges of implementing LBTA in practice. For example, it's unclear how well the reflection model can capture the complete reasoning process of the base model, especially for more complex problems. Additionally, the added complexity of training both the base model and the reflection model could make the overall system more computationally expensive and difficult to scale.
Furthermore, the paper does not discuss how LBTA might perform on real-world mathematical reasoning tasks that involve ambiguity, incomplete information, or the need for creative problem-solving. These are important considerations for the practical application of such systems.
Overall, the "Learn Beyond The Answer" framework is a compelling and potentially impactful approach, but further research is needed to address its limitations and ensure its robustness and scalability for real-world mathematical reasoning applications.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel framework called "Learn Beyond The Answer" (LBTA) that aims to train language models to improve their mathematical reasoning abilities. LBTA incorporates a reflection mechanism that encourages the model to analyze its own thought process and learn from its mistakes, rather than just focusing on generating correct answers.
The evaluation results show that LBTA outperforms standard language model training approaches on a range of mathematical reasoning tasks, suggesting that the reflection component helps the model develop a deeper understanding of the underlying concepts.
This work represents an important step towards building more capable and reliable language models, particularly for applications that require strong mathematical reasoning skills. By incorporating self-reflection and introspection into the training process, language models may be able to better generalize and handle more complex mathematical problems, with potential benefits for fields like education, scientific research, and decision-making.
However, further research is needed to address the limitations and challenges of implementing LBTA in practice, as well as to explore its performance on real-world mathematical reasoning tasks. Nonetheless, the "Learn Beyond The Answer" framework is a promising direction for advancing the state of the art in language model-based mathematical reasoning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Learn Beyond The Answer: Training Language Models with Reflection for Mathematical Reasoning
Zhihan Zhang, Zhenwen Liang, Wenhao Yu, Dian Yu, Mengzhao Jia, Dong Yu, Meng Jiang
Supervised fine-tuning enhances the problem-solving abilities of language models across various mathematical reasoning tasks. To maximize such benefits, existing research focuses on broadening the training set with various data augmentation techniques, which is effective for standard single-round question-answering settings. Our work introduces a novel technique aimed at cultivating a deeper understanding of the training problems at hand, enhancing performance not only in standard settings but also in more complex scenarios that require reflective thinking. Specifically, we propose reflective augmentation, a method that embeds problem reflection into each training instance. It trains the model to consider alternative perspectives and engage with abstractions and analogies, thereby fostering a thorough comprehension through reflective reasoning. Extensive experiments validate the achievement of our aim, underscoring the unique advantages of our method and its complementary nature relative to existing augmentation techniques.
Read more6/19/2024
0
When Hindsight is Not 20/20: Testing Limits on Reflective Thinking in Large Language Models
Yanhong Li, Chenghao Yang, Allyson Ettinger
Recent studies suggest that self-reflective prompting can significantly enhance the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the use of external feedback as a stop criterion raises doubts about the true extent of LLMs' ability to emulate human-like self-reflection. In this paper, we set out to clarify these capabilities under a more stringent evaluation setting in which we disallow any kind of external feedback. Our findings under this setting show a split: while self-reflection enhances performance in TruthfulQA, it adversely affects results in HotpotQA. We conduct follow-up analyses to clarify the contributing factors in these patterns, and find that the influence of self-reflection is impacted both by reliability of accuracy in models' initial responses, and by overall question difficulty: specifically, self-reflection shows the most benefit when models are less likely to be correct initially, and when overall question difficulty is higher. We also find that self-reflection reduces tendency toward majority voting. Based on our findings, we propose guidelines for decisions on when to implement self-reflection. We release the codebase for reproducing our experiments at https://github.com/yanhong-lbh/LLM-SelfReflection-Eval.
Read more4/16/2024
0
Reflection-Reinforced Self-Training for Language Agents
Zi-Yi Dou, Cheng-Fu Yang, Xueqing Wu, Kai-Wei Chang, Nanyun Peng
Finetuning language agents with reasoning-action trajectories is effective, but obtaining these trajectories from human annotations or stronger models is costly and sometimes impractical. In this paper, we investigate the use of self-training in language agents, which can generate supervision from the agent itself, offering a promising alternative without relying on human or stronger model demonstrations. Self-training, however, requires high-quality model-generated samples, which are hard to obtain for challenging language agent tasks. To address this, we present Reflection-Reinforced Self-Training (Re-ReST), which uses a textit{reflector} to refine low-quality generated samples during self-training. The reflector takes the agent's output and feedback from an external environment (e.g., unit test results in code generation) to produce improved samples. This technique enhances the quality of inferior samples and efficiently enriches the self-training dataset with higher-quality samples. We conduct extensive experiments on open-source language agents across tasks, including multi-hop question answering, sequential decision-making, code generation, visual question answering, and text-to-image generation. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of self-training and Re-ReST in language agent tasks, with self-training improving baselines by 7.6% on HotpotQA and 28.4% on AlfWorld, and Re-ReST further boosting performance by 2.0% and 14.1%, respectively. Our studies also confirm the efficiency of using a reflector to generate high-quality samples for self-training. Moreover, we demonstrate a method to employ reflection during inference without ground-truth feedback, addressing the limitation of previous reflection work. Our code is released at https://github.com/PlusLabNLP/Re-ReST.
Read more7/9/2024
🏋️
0
Question Translation Training for Better Multilingual Reasoning
Wenhao Zhu, Shujian Huang, Fei Yuan, Shuaijie She, Jiajun Chen, Alexandra Birch
Large language models show compelling performance on reasoning tasks but they tend to perform much worse in languages other than English. This is unsurprising given that their training data largely consists of English text and instructions. A typical solution is to translate instruction data into all languages of interest, and then train on the resulting multilingual data, which is called translate-training. This approach not only incurs high cost, but also results in poorly translated data due to the non-standard formatting of mathematical chain-of-thought. In this paper, we explore the benefits of question alignment, where we train the model to translate reasoning questions into English by finetuning on X-English parallel question data. In this way we perform targeted, in-domain language alignment which makes best use of English instruction data to unlock the LLMs' multilingual reasoning abilities. Experimental results on LLaMA2-13B show that question alignment leads to consistent improvements over the translate-training approach: an average improvement of 11.3% and 16.1% accuracy across ten languages on the MGSM and MSVAMP multilingual reasoning benchmarks. The project will be available at: https://github.com/NJUNLP/QAlign.
Read more7/2/2024