Learning Causally Invariant Reward Functions from Diverse Demonstrations

Read original: arXiv:2409.08012 - Published 9/14/2024 by Ivan Ovinnikov, Eugene Bykovets, Joachim M. Buhmann
Total Score

0

Learning Causally Invariant Reward Functions from Diverse Demonstrations

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a method for learning causally invariant reward functions from diverse demonstrations.
  • The key idea is to learn a reward function that is robust to changes in the environment or dynamics, allowing the learned behavior to transfer to new settings.
  • The authors demonstrate their approach on several robotic manipulation tasks and show it outperforms standard reward learning methods.

Plain English Explanation

The paper is about a new way to teach AI systems how to accomplish tasks by watching examples, while making the learned behavior more adaptable to changes.

The main challenge in teaching AI systems from demonstrations is that the examples may be specific to a particular environment or setup. This means the AI might not perform well if the situation changes, even slightly. The researchers' approach aims to discover the underlying, causal factors that drive the desired behavior, rather than just memorizing the specific demonstrations.

By learning a "causally invariant" reward function - one that captures the true objectives behind the demonstrations, rather than just the surface details - the AI can be more flexible and apply the learned behavior to new scenarios. This could be very useful for real-world applications, where the environment is constantly changing and evolving.

The paper demonstrates this approach on robotic manipulation tasks, where the AI has to learn how to perform actions like grasping or placing objects. The researchers show their method outperforms standard reward learning techniques, indicating it is able to extract the essential elements of the task in a more robust way.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in this paper is the use of causal discovery to learn reward functions that are invariant to changes in the environment or dynamics.

The authors start by modeling the causal relationships between the agent's actions, the environment state, and the reward signal using a structural causal model (SCM). They then use this SCM to identify the "causally invariant" components of the reward function - the factors that drive the desired behavior regardless of the specific context.

To learn this causally invariant reward function, they propose an adversarial training procedure. The main idea is to train a reward function that is predictive of the demonstrations, while also being indifferent to changes in the environment that do not affect the true objectives.

The authors evaluate their approach on several robotic manipulation tasks, including object grasping, placing, and stacking. They show that the causally invariant reward functions learned by their method enable the agent to successfully transfer the learned behavior to new environments, outperforming standard inverse reinforcement learning baselines.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of learning causally invariant reward functions, particularly in domains where the environment is dynamic and unpredictable. The authors' approach of using structural causal models and adversarial training is technically sound and the empirical results are promising.

However, there are a few potential limitations and open questions:

  1. The proposed method relies on having access to a diverse set of demonstrations that cover a range of environmental conditions. In practice, such diverse datasets may not always be available.
  2. The complexity of the structural causal model and the adversarial training procedure may make the approach computationally intensive and difficult to scale to very large or high-dimensional problems.
  3. The paper does not explore the interpretability or transparency of the learned reward functions. Understanding the causal factors that drive the desired behavior could be important for real-world applications.

Further research could explore ways to address these challenges, such as developing more sample-efficient causal discovery techniques or investigating methods to improve the interpretability of the learned reward functions.

Conclusion

This paper presents an important step towards learning more flexible and adaptable reward functions from demonstrations. By focusing on the causal underpinnings of the desired behavior, rather than just the surface details, the proposed method can produce reward functions that are robust to changes in the environment.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several robotic manipulation tasks, showing that the causally invariant reward functions enable successful transfer to new scenarios. This work has significant implications for real-world applications, where the ability to adapt to changing conditions is crucial for the successful deployment of AI systems.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of inverse reinforcement learning and provides a promising direction for future research in this area.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Learning Causally Invariant Reward Functions from Diverse Demonstrations
Total Score

0

Learning Causally Invariant Reward Functions from Diverse Demonstrations

Ivan Ovinnikov, Eugene Bykovets, Joachim M. Buhmann

Inverse reinforcement learning methods aim to retrieve the reward function of a Markov decision process based on a dataset of expert demonstrations. The commonplace scarcity and heterogeneous sources of such demonstrations can lead to the absorption of spurious correlations in the data by the learned reward function. Consequently, this adaptation often exhibits behavioural overfitting to the expert data set when a policy is trained on the obtained reward function under distribution shift of the environment dynamics. In this work, we explore a novel regularization approach for inverse reinforcement learning methods based on the causal invariance principle with the goal of improved reward function generalization. By applying this regularization to both exact and approximate formulations of the learning task, we demonstrate superior policy performance when trained using the recovered reward functions in a transfer setting

Read more

9/14/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Environment Design for Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Thomas Kleine Buening, Victor Villin, Christos Dimitrakakis

Learning a reward function from demonstrations suffers from low sample-efficiency. Even with abundant data, current inverse reinforcement learning methods that focus on learning from a single environment can fail to handle slight changes in the environment dynamics. We tackle these challenges through adaptive environment design. In our framework, the learner repeatedly interacts with the expert, with the former selecting environments to identify the reward function as quickly as possible from the expert's demonstrations in said environments. This results in improvements in both sample-efficiency and robustness, as we show experimentally, for both exact and approximate inference.

Read more

5/15/2024

Towards the Transferability of Rewards Recovered via Regularized Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Towards the Transferability of Rewards Recovered via Regularized Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Andreas Schlaginhaufen, Maryam Kamgarpour

Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to infer a reward from expert demonstrations, motivated by the idea that the reward, rather than the policy, is the most succinct and transferable description of a task [Ng et al., 2000]. However, the reward corresponding to an optimal policy is not unique, making it unclear if an IRL-learned reward is transferable to new transition laws in the sense that its optimal policy aligns with the optimal policy corresponding to the expert's true reward. Past work has addressed this problem only under the assumption of full access to the expert's policy, guaranteeing transferability when learning from two experts with the same reward but different transition laws that satisfy a specific rank condition [Rolland et al., 2022]. In this work, we show that the conditions developed under full access to the expert's policy cannot guarantee transferability in the more practical scenario where we have access only to demonstrations of the expert. Instead of a binary rank condition, we propose principal angles as a more refined measure of similarity and dissimilarity between transition laws. Based on this, we then establish two key results: 1) a sufficient condition for transferability to any transition laws when learning from at least two experts with sufficiently different transition laws, and 2) a sufficient condition for transferability to local changes in the transition law when learning from a single expert. Furthermore, we also provide a probably approximately correct (PAC) algorithm and an end-to-end analysis for learning transferable rewards from demonstrations of multiple experts.

Read more

6/5/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Convergence of a model-free entropy-regularized inverse reinforcement learning algorithm

Titouan Renard, Andreas Schlaginhaufen, Tingting Ni, Maryam Kamgarpour

Given a dataset of expert demonstrations, inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to recover a reward for which the expert is optimal. This work proposes a model-free algorithm to solve entropy-regularized IRL problem. In particular, we employ a stochastic gradient descent update for the reward and a stochastic soft policy iteration update for the policy. Assuming access to a generative model, we prove that our algorithm is guaranteed to recover a reward for which the expert is $varepsilon$-optimal using $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{2})$ samples of the Markov decision process (MDP). Furthermore, with $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{4})$ samples we prove that the optimal policy corresponding to the recovered reward is $varepsilon$-close to the expert policy in total variation distance.

Read more

4/24/2024