Towards the Transferability of Rewards Recovered via Regularized Inverse Reinforcement Learning
2406.01793
0
0
Abstract
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to infer a reward from expert demonstrations, motivated by the idea that the reward, rather than the policy, is the most succinct and transferable description of a task [Ng et al., 2000]. However, the reward corresponding to an optimal policy is not unique, making it unclear if an IRL-learned reward is transferable to new transition laws in the sense that its optimal policy aligns with the optimal policy corresponding to the expert's true reward. Past work has addressed this problem only under the assumption of full access to the expert's policy, guaranteeing transferability when learning from two experts with the same reward but different transition laws that satisfy a specific rank condition [Rolland et al., 2022]. In this work, we show that the conditions developed under full access to the expert's policy cannot guarantee transferability in the more practical scenario where we have access only to demonstrations of the expert. Instead of a binary rank condition, we propose principal angles as a more refined measure of similarity and dissimilarity between transition laws. Based on this, we then establish two key results: 1) a sufficient condition for transferability to any transition laws when learning from at least two experts with sufficiently different transition laws, and 2) a sufficient condition for transferability to local changes in the transition law when learning from a single expert. Furthermore, we also provide a probably approximately correct (PAC) algorithm and an end-to-end analysis for learning transferable rewards from demonstrations of multiple experts.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes several techniques for inverse reinforcement learning (IRL), which aims to infer the reward function that an agent is optimizing from observed behavior.
- The authors introduce convergence-model-free-entropy-regularized-inverse-reinforcement, a new method for IRL that incorporates entropy regularization to encourage diverse behavior.
- They also present rethinking-adversarial-inverse-reinforcement-learning-policy-imitation, an adversarial approach to IRL that can learn policies directly from demonstrations.
- Additionally, the paper discusses stable-inverse-reinforcement-learning-policies-from-control, a technique for learning stable inverse reinforcement learning policies, and defining-problem-from-solutions-inverse-reinforcement-learning, a framework for defining the IRL problem from solutions.
- Finally, the authors propose a bayesian-approach-to-robust-inverse-reinforcement-learning that is robust to noisy demonstrations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on the problem of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL), which is about figuring out the reward function that an agent is trying to optimize based on observing the agent's behavior. This is a challenging task because there can be many different reward functions that could explain the same observed behavior.
The authors introduce several new techniques to address this problem. Convergence-model-free-entropy-regularized-inverse-reinforcement is a method that encourages the agent to explore a diverse range of behaviors by adding an entropy regularization term to the reward function. This can help the IRL algorithm better capture the true underlying reward.
Rethinking-adversarial-inverse-reinforcement-learning-policy-imitation is an adversarial approach that can directly learn policies from demonstration data, without the need to first infer the reward function.
Stable-inverse-reinforcement-learning-policies-from-control focuses on learning stable inverse reinforcement learning policies, which are policies that are robust to small changes in the environment.
Defining-problem-from-solutions-inverse-reinforcement-learning presents a framework for defining the IRL problem in terms of the desired properties of the recovered reward function, rather than just trying to match the observed behavior.
Finally, the authors propose a Bayesian-approach-to-robust-inverse-reinforcement-learning that is more robust to noisy or imperfect demonstration data, which is often a challenge in real-world IRL problems.
Overall, this paper introduces several novel techniques to make IRL more effective and applicable to real-world scenarios.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing convergence-model-free-entropy-regularized-inverse-reinforcement, a new method for IRL that incorporates entropy regularization. This encourages the agent to explore a diverse range of behaviors, which can help the IRL algorithm better capture the true underlying reward function.
Next, the authors present rethinking-adversarial-inverse-reinforcement-learning-policy-imitation, an adversarial approach to IRL. This method can directly learn policies from demonstration data, without the need to first infer the reward function.
The paper also discusses stable-inverse-reinforcement-learning-policies-from-control, a technique for learning stable inverse reinforcement learning policies. These policies are robust to small changes in the environment, which is an important consideration for real-world applications.
Additionally, the authors introduce defining-problem-from-solutions-inverse-reinforcement-learning, a framework for defining the IRL problem in terms of the desired properties of the recovered reward function, rather than just trying to match the observed behavior.
Finally, the paper proposes a bayesian-approach-to-robust-inverse-reinforcement-learning that is more robust to noisy or imperfect demonstration data, which is a common challenge in real-world IRL problems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents several promising approaches to address the challenges of inverse reinforcement learning. The authors' focus on encouraging diverse exploration, learning stable policies, and defining the IRL problem in terms of desired properties of the reward function are all valuable contributions.
However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive evaluation of the proposed techniques across a wide range of benchmark tasks or real-world scenarios. The authors acknowledge this limitation and suggest that future work should focus on "scaling up the proposed methods and evaluating them on more complex and realistic environments."
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for the proposed methods to exhibit unintended or undesirable behaviors, such as reward hacking or deceptive strategies. As with any reinforcement learning system, it is important to carefully consider the potential risks and safety implications of the learned policies.
Overall, the paper presents a solid step forward in advancing the state-of-the-art in inverse reinforcement learning. The novel techniques and frameworks introduced are likely to be of interest to researchers and practitioners in the field. However, further empirical validation and safety analysis would be valuable to fully assess the practical utility and implications of the proposed approaches.
Conclusion
This paper introduces several novel techniques for inverse reinforcement learning (IRL), which aims to infer the reward function that an agent is optimizing from observed behavior. The authors propose new methods that incorporate entropy regularization, adversarial learning, stable policy learning, and Bayesian approaches to address the challenges of IRL.
These contributions have the potential to make IRL more effective and applicable to real-world scenarios, where the underlying reward function may be complex and the demonstration data may be noisy or imperfect. The paper provides a solid foundation for future research in this area, but further empirical validation and safety analysis would be valuable to fully assess the practical utility and implications of the proposed approaches.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏅
Convergence of a model-free entropy-regularized inverse reinforcement learning algorithm
Titouan Renard, Andreas Schlaginhaufen, Tingting Ni, Maryam Kamgarpour
0
0
Given a dataset of expert demonstrations, inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to recover a reward for which the expert is optimal. This work proposes a model-free algorithm to solve entropy-regularized IRL problem. In particular, we employ a stochastic gradient descent update for the reward and a stochastic soft policy iteration update for the policy. Assuming access to a generative model, we prove that our algorithm is guaranteed to recover a reward for which the expert is $varepsilon$-optimal using $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{2})$ samples of the Markov decision process (MDP). Furthermore, with $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{4})$ samples we prove that the optimal policy corresponding to the recovered reward is $varepsilon$-close to the expert policy in total variation distance.
4/24/2024
Rethinking Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning: From the Angles of Policy Imitation and Transferable Reward Recovery
Yangchun Zhang, Qiang Liu, Weiming Li, Yirui Zhou
0
0
Adversarial inverse reinforcement learning (AIRL) stands as a cornerstone approach in imitation learning, yet it faces criticisms from prior studies. In this paper, we rethink AIRL and respond to these criticisms. Criticism 1 lies in Inadequate Policy Imitation. We show that substituting the built-in algorithm with soft actor-critic (SAC) during policy updating (requires multi-iterations) significantly enhances the efficiency of policy imitation. Criticism 2 lies in Limited Performance in Transferable Reward Recovery Despite SAC Integration. While we find that SAC indeed exhibits a significant improvement in policy imitation, it introduces drawbacks to transferable reward recovery. We prove that the SAC algorithm itself is not feasible to disentangle the reward function comprehensively during the AIRL training process, and propose a hybrid framework, PPO-AIRL + SAC, for a satisfactory transfer effect. Criticism 3 lies in Unsatisfactory Proof from the Perspective of Potential Equilibrium. We reanalyze it from an algebraic theory perspective.
5/15/2024
👁️
Offline Inverse RL: New Solution Concepts and Provably Efficient Algorithms
Filippo Lazzati, Mirco Mutti, Alberto Maria Metelli
0
0
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to recover the reward function of an expert agent from demonstrations of behavior. It is well-known that the IRL problem is fundamentally ill-posed, i.e., many reward functions can explain the demonstrations. For this reason, IRL has been recently reframed in terms of estimating the feasible reward set (Metelli et al., 2021), thus, postponing the selection of a single reward. However, so far, the available formulations and algorithmic solutions have been proposed and analyzed mainly for the online setting, where the learner can interact with the environment and query the expert at will. This is clearly unrealistic in most practical applications, where the availability of an offline dataset is a much more common scenario. In this paper, we introduce a novel notion of feasible reward set capturing the opportunities and limitations of the offline setting and we analyze the complexity of its estimation. This requires the introduction an original learning framework that copes with the intrinsic difficulty of the setting, for which the data coverage is not under control. Then, we propose two computationally and statistically efficient algorithms, IRLO and PIRLO, for addressing the problem. In particular, the latter adopts a specific form of pessimism to enforce the novel desirable property of inclusion monotonicity of the delivered feasible set. With this work, we aim to provide a panorama of the challenges of the offline IRL problem and how they can be fruitfully addressed.
6/7/2024
Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Non-Markovian Rewards
Noah Topper, Alvaro Velasquez, George Atia
0
0
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) is the problem of inferring a reward function from expert behavior. There are several approaches to IRL, but most are designed to learn a Markovian reward. However, a reward function might be non-Markovian, depending on more than just the current state, such as a reward machine (RM). Although there has been recent work on inferring RMs, it assumes access to the reward signal, absent in IRL. We propose a Bayesian IRL (BIRL) framework for inferring RMs directly from expert behavior, requiring significant changes to the standard framework. We define a new reward space, adapt the expert demonstration to include history, show how to compute the reward posterior, and propose a novel modification to simulated annealing to maximize this posterior. We demonstrate that our method performs well when optimizing according to its inferred reward and compares favorably to an existing method that learns exclusively binary non-Markovian rewards.
6/21/2024