Learning Embeddings for Sequential Tasks Using Population of Agents

Overview

• This paper presents an information-theoretic framework to learn fixed-dimensional embeddings for tasks in reinforcement learning.
• The key idea is that two tasks are considered similar if observing an agent's performance on one task reduces the uncertainty about its performance on the other.
• The authors use a diverse agent population as an approximation for the space of agents to measure this task similarity in sequential decision-making settings.
• They demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach for two applications: predicting an agent's performance on a new task and selecting tasks with desired characteristics from a set of options.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a new way to understand how similar different tasks are in reinforcement learning. The core idea is that if observing how well an agent performs on one task helps you predict how it will do on another task, then those two tasks are considered similar.

To measure this, the researchers use a diverse collection of agents as a stand-in for the full space of possible agents. They then look at how much information about an agent's performance on one task is revealed by its performance on another task. Tasks that share a lot of this "mutual information" are deemed more similar.

The researchers show that this information-theoretic approach to quantifying task similarity is useful for two practical applications in reinforcement learning. First, it allows them to predict how well an agent will perform on a new task, just by looking at its performance on a small set of "quiz" tasks. Second, it helps them select tasks from a larger pool that have desired characteristics, like being more or less similar to a reference task.

This work provides a principled, information-based way to understand the relationships between different decision-making tasks, which could be valuable for applications that leverage task embeddings or transfer learning in reinforcement learning.

Technical Explanation

The core of this work is an information-theoretic framework for learning task embeddings in reinforcement learning. The authors start from the intuition that two tasks are similar if an agent's performance on one task provides information about its performance on the other.

Formally, they define a task similarity metric based on the mutual information between an agent's performance on two tasks. To approximate this, they use a diverse population of agents as a stand-in for the full space of possible agents. They then compute the mutual information between each pair of tasks by looking at the performance correlations across this agent population.

The authors demonstrate the value of these learned task embeddings in two reinforcement learning scenarios. First, they show that the task similarities can be used to predict an agent's performance on a new task by observing its performance on a small "quiz" of related tasks, via meta-learning. Second, they use the task embeddings to select a subset of tasks from a larger pool that have desired characteristics, like being more or less similar to a reference task, which could be useful for curriculum learning or transfer learning scenarios.

Critical Analysis

The core information-theoretic approach in this work provides a principled and flexible way to quantify task similarity in reinforcement learning. However, the authors note that their framework relies on having access to a diverse population of agents as a proxy for the full agent space. In practice, this agent diversity may be difficult to obtain, which could limit the applicability of their techniques.

Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore the nature of the task similarities captured by the learned embeddings. While the authors demonstrate the utility of these embeddings for specific applications, it would be valuable to further investigate the types of task relationships that are being encoded and their cognitive interpretability.

Finally, the authors primarily evaluate their approach on relatively simple synthetic environments. Demonstrating the effectiveness of their techniques on more complex, real-world reinforcement learning problems would further strengthen the impact of this work.

Conclusion

This paper presents an innovative information-theoretic framework for learning task embeddings in reinforcement learning. By quantifying task similarity based on mutual information between agent performance, the authors enable new applications like predicting agent performance on novel tasks and selecting subsets of tasks with desired characteristics.

While the reliance on a diverse agent population is a potential limitation, this work provides a principled and flexible approach to understanding relationships between decision-making tasks. Further research into the nature of the learned task embeddings and their effectiveness on more complex real-world problems could unlock even greater practical benefits.