Learning linear dynamical systems under convex constraints

Overview

• This paper focuses on the problem of identifying linear dynamical systems from a limited number of samples of a single trajectory.
• The authors assume that prior structural information about the system matrix is available, which can be captured as a convex set containing the true system matrix.
• They derive non-asymptotic error bounds for the constrained least squares estimator, which depend on the local size of the convex set around the true system matrix.
• The authors illustrate their results with four examples, including sparse systems, subspaces, convex regression, and Lipschitz functions.

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the authors consider the problem of learning the dynamics of a linear system from a relatively small amount of data - specifically, from just T samples of a single trajectory of the system. This is an important task in Control Theory and System Identification.

The key insight is that if we have some prior information about the structure of the underlying system matrix, we can use that to improve the accuracy of our estimates, even with a limited amount of data. For example, we might know that the system matrix is sparse, or that it lies in a particular subspace, or has some other structural property.

The authors show that by incorporating this structural information into the estimation process - specifically, by solving a constrained least squares problem - we can obtain much tighter error bounds than what is possible without any structural assumptions. They provide several concrete examples to illustrate this point, including sparse systems, subspaces, convex regression, and Lipschitz functions.

The main takeaway is that leveraging prior structural information about the system can greatly improve the sample complexity of system identification, allowing us to accurately learn the system dynamics from far fewer data samples than would be required in the unconstrained setting.

Technical Explanation

The authors consider the problem of finite-time identification of linear dynamical systems from T samples of a single trajectory. They assume that prior structural information about the system matrix A* is available, which can be captured in the form of a convex set K containing A*.

To solve this problem, the authors derive non-asymptotic error bounds in the Frobenius norm for the constrained least squares estimator of A*, which depends on the local size of K around A*. Specifically, they show that the error scales inversely with the minimum singular value of the Jacobian of the constraint set K, evaluated at A*.

To illustrate the usefulness of these results, the authors consider four examples:

1. Sparse systems: K is an ℓ1 ball around A*.
2. Subspaces: K is a linear subspace.
3. Convex regression: K consists of matrices formed by sampling a bivariate convex function on a uniform grid.
4. Lipschitz functions: K consists of matrices where each row is formed by uniform sampling of a univariate Lipschitz function.

In all these cases, the authors show that A* can be reliably estimated for values of T much smaller than what is needed for the unconstrained setting, thanks to the structural information captured by the convex set K.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the sample complexity of system identification under structural constraints. The authors' key insight - that leveraging prior information about the system matrix can significantly improve the sample complexity - is both technically sound and practically relevant.

One potential limitation of the work is that the analysis is confined to the Frobenius norm as the performance metric. In practice, other norms, such as the spectral norm, may be more relevant, especially for control-theoretic applications. It would be interesting to see if the authors' techniques can be extended to handle different error metrics.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity of solving the constrained least squares problem. For certain constraint sets K, the optimization problem may become challenging, and it would be helpful to understand the trade-offs between estimation accuracy and computational efficiency.

Finally, the authors mention that their results can be extended to handle more general classes of constraints, such as distributionally robust Lyapunov function search. Exploring these extensions and their practical implications could be a fruitful direction for future research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel framework for finite-time identification of linear dynamical systems that leverages prior structural information about the system matrix. By formulating the estimation problem as a constrained least squares problem, the authors derive non-asymptotic error bounds that depend on the local geometry of the constraint set.

The key contribution of this work is that it demonstrates the significant benefits of incorporating structural information into the system identification process, which can dramatically reduce the amount of data required for reliable estimation. This has important implications for a wide range of applications, from control theory to decentralized online learning, where sample-efficient system identification is crucial.

Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the theory and practice of system identification, and the authors' insights are likely to inspire further developments in this active area of research.