Sample Complexity Bounds for Linear System Identification from a Finite Set
0
🔮
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides sample complexity bounds for linear system identification from a finite set of data.
- It analyzes the problem of estimating the parameters of a linear dynamical system using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) from a finite set of observations.
- The authors derive upper bounds on the sample complexity required to achieve a certain level of estimation accuracy.
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers are looking at the problem of linear system identification. This means trying to figure out the parameters of a linear dynamical system - like how different inputs and outputs are related over time - based on a finite set of observed data.
The key idea is to use a technique called maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to estimate these parameters from the available data. MLE tries to find the parameter values that make the observed data the most likely.
The main contribution of this paper is to derive sample complexity bounds. This means they work out how much data you need to collect in order to estimate the system parameters with a certain level of accuracy.
The analysis takes into account factors like the complexity of the system, the noise in the observations, and the desired accuracy. By understanding these sample complexity bounds, you can plan how much data you need to collect for a given linear system identification task.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on the linear system identification problem, where the goal is to estimate the parameters of a linear dynamical system from a finite set of observations.
The authors consider a setting where the system is observed in a finite set of states, and they use maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to estimate the system parameters.
The main technical contribution is deriving sample complexity bounds - that is, upper bounds on the number of observations required to achieve a certain level of estimation accuracy. These bounds depend on factors like the complexity of the system, the noise levels, and the desired accuracy.
The analysis involves several technical steps, including:
- Characterizing the MLE problem as a constrained optimization
- Bounding the estimation error in terms of the gradients and Hessian of the likelihood function
- Deriving sample complexity bounds that hold with high probability
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous analysis of the sample complexity for linear system identification using MLE. The main strengths are:
- The analysis is theoretically grounded, deriving non-asymptotic bounds that hold with high probability.
- The bounds incorporate various problem-specific parameters, allowing the results to be applied to different settings.
- The techniques used, such as bounding the gradients and Hessian, are general and could potentially be applied to other estimation problems.
However, some potential limitations and areas for further research include:
- The analysis assumes a finite set of observed states, which may not always be the case in practice.
- The bounds may be conservative, and tighter results may be possible with more refined analysis.
- The paper does not consider potential extensions, such as to nonlinear or partially observed systems.
- It would be valuable to have empirical validations of the theoretical bounds on real-world datasets.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the theoretical understanding of linear system identification, which has implications for a wide range of applications in control, robotics, and beyond.
Conclusion
This paper provides a rigorous analysis of the sample complexity for linear system identification using maximum likelihood estimation. The authors derive non-asymptotic upper bounds on the number of observations required to achieve a certain level of estimation accuracy, taking into account factors like system complexity and noise levels.
The technical analysis is a valuable contribution to the theoretical foundations of system identification, and the results can help inform the design and evaluation of practical system identification algorithms. While the analysis has some limitations, it opens up interesting avenues for further research on sample complexity in related estimation problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
0
Sample Complexity Bounds for Linear System Identification from a Finite Set
Nicolas Chatzikiriakos, Andrea Iannelli
This paper considers a finite sample perspective on the problem of identifying an LTI system from a finite set of possible systems using trajectory data. To this end, we use the maximum likelihood estimator to identify the true system and provide an upper bound for its sample complexity. Crucially, the derived bound does not rely on a potentially restrictive stability assumption. Additionally, we leverage tools from information theory to provide a lower bound to the sample complexity that holds independently of the used estimator. The derived sample complexity bounds are analyzed analytically and numerically.
Read more9/18/2024
🔎
0
Learning linear dynamical systems under convex constraints
Hemant Tyagi, Denis Efimov
We consider the problem of finite-time identification of linear dynamical systems from $T$ samples of a single trajectory. Recent results have predominantly focused on the setup where no structural assumption is made on the system matrix $A^* in mathbb{R}^{n times n}$, and have consequently analyzed the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator in detail. We assume prior structural information on $A^*$ is available, which can be captured in the form of a convex set $mathcal{K}$ containing $A^*$. For the solution of the ensuing constrained least squares estimator, we derive non-asymptotic error bounds in the Frobenius norm that depend on the local size of $mathcal{K}$ at $A^*$. To illustrate the usefulness of these results, we instantiate them for four examples, namely when (i) $A^*$ is sparse and $mathcal{K}$ is a suitably scaled $ell_1$ ball; (ii) $mathcal{K}$ is a subspace; (iii) $mathcal{K}$ consists of matrices each of which is formed by sampling a bivariate convex function on a uniform $n times n$ grid (convex regression); (iv) $mathcal{K}$ consists of matrices each row of which is formed by uniform sampling (with step size $1/T$) of a univariate Lipschitz function. In all these situations, we show that $A^*$ can be reliably estimated for values of $T$ much smaller than what is needed for the unconstrained setting.
Read more5/3/2024
🌿
0
Estimation Sample Complexity of a Class of Nonlinear Continuous-time Systems
Simon Kuang, Xinfan Lin
We present a method of parameter estimation for large class of nonlinear systems, namely those in which the state consists of output derivatives and the flow is linear in the parameter. The method, which solves for the unknown parameter by directly inverting the dynamics using regularized linear regression, is based on new design and analysis ideas for differentiation filtering and regularized least squares. Combined in series, they yield a novel finite-sample bound on mean absolute error of estimation.
Read more7/16/2024
0
A least-square method for non-asymptotic identification in linear switching control
Haoyuan Sun, Ali Jadbabaie
The focus of this paper is on linear system identification in the setting where it is known that the underlying partially-observed linear dynamical system lies within a finite collection of known candidate models. We first consider the problem of identification from a given trajectory, which in this setting reduces to identifying the index of the true model with high probability. We characterize the finite-time sample complexity of this problem by leveraging recent advances in the non-asymptotic analysis of linear least-square methods in the literature. In comparison to the earlier results that assume no prior knowledge of the system, our approach takes advantage of the smaller hypothesis class and leads to the design of a learner with a dimension-free sample complexity bound. Next, we consider the switching control of linear systems, where there is a candidate controller for each of the candidate models and data is collected through interaction of the system with a collection of potentially destabilizing controllers. We develop a dimension-dependent criterion that can detect those destabilizing controllers in finite time. By leveraging these results, we propose a data-driven switching strategy that identifies the unknown parameters of the underlying system. We then provide a non-asymptotic analysis of its performance and discuss its implications on the classical method of estimator-based supervisory control.
Read more4/15/2024