Learning Payment-Free Resource Allocation Mechanisms
2311.10927
0
0
🏷️
Abstract
We consider the design of mechanisms that allocate limited resources among self-interested agents using neural networks. Unlike the recent works that leverage machine learning for revenue maximization in auctions, we consider welfare maximization as the key objective in the payment-free setting. Without payment exchange, it is unclear how we can align agents' incentives to achieve the desired objectives of truthfulness and social welfare simultaneously, without resorting to approximations. Our work makes novel contributions by designing an approximate mechanism that desirably trade-off social welfare with truthfulness. Specifically, (i) we contribute a new end-to-end neural network architecture, ExS-Net, that accommodates the idea of money-burning for mechanism design without payments; (ii)~we provide a generalization bound that guarantees the mechanism performance when trained under finite samples; and (iii) we provide an experimental demonstration of the merits of the proposed mechanism.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the design of mechanisms for allocating limited resources among self-interested agents using neural networks, with a focus on welfare maximization rather than revenue maximization.
- The key challenge is aligning agents' incentives to achieve truthfulness and social welfare simultaneously without payment exchanges or approximations.
- The paper makes three main contributions: (i) a new neural network architecture called ExS-Net that incorporates money-burning for payment-free mechanism design, (ii) a generalization bound that guarantees mechanism performance under finite samples, and (iii) experimental demonstration of the proposed mechanism's merits.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how to design AI systems to distribute limited resources fairly among different parties with their own interests. Unlike recent work that uses machine learning to maximize revenue in auctions, the focus here is on maximizing the overall welfare or benefit to society.
Without any payments involved, it's unclear how to get the parties to truthfully reveal their preferences and also achieve the best overall outcome. The researchers tackle this challenge by designing a new neural network architecture that can "burn" a bit of the resources to align the parties' incentives, without needing to use actual payments.
They also provide a mathematical guarantee that their approach will perform well, even when only a limited amount of training data is available. And they demonstrate through experiments that their proposed mechanism has real-world merits.
Technical Explanation
The paper addresses the problem of designing resource allocation mechanisms using machine learning, where the key objective is to maximize social welfare rather than revenue.
The authors contribute a new neural network architecture called ExS-Net that incorporates the idea of "money-burning" to incentivize truthful reporting of preferences in a payment-free setting. This is a departure from recent works that have focused on revenue maximization in auctions using machine learning.
Theoretically, the authors provide a generalization bound that guarantees the mechanism's performance when trained on finite samples. This is an important result, as it ensures the mechanism can be deployed with confidence in practical scenarios with limited data.
Experimentally, the paper demonstrates the merits of the proposed mechanism, showing its ability to achieve desirable trade-offs between truthfulness and social welfare without requiring payments.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of welfare maximization in resource allocation mechanisms, rather than solely focusing on revenue maximization. This aligns well with the growing emphasis on building AI systems that are socially beneficial.
However, the paper does not address potential issues around the interpretability and transparency of the proposed neural network-based mechanism. As black-box models, there may be concerns about the explainability of the allocation decisions, which could be a barrier to real-world deployment.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the scalability of the approach to large-scale resource allocation problems. The experimental evaluation is limited, and further research would be needed to understand the mechanism's performance in more complex, real-world scenarios.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to the design of resource allocation mechanisms using machine learning, with a focus on welfare maximization rather than revenue maximization. The key contribution is the ExS-Net architecture, which incorporates the idea of "money-burning" to align agents' incentives without requiring actual payments.
The theoretical and experimental results demonstrate the viability of this approach, providing a promising direction for building AI systems that can distribute scarce resources fairly and efficiently. However, further research is needed to address potential concerns around interpretability and scalability, as well as to explore the broader implications of this work for the field of mechanism design.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Paying to Do Better: Games with Payments between Learning Agents
Yoav Kolumbus, Joe Halpern, 'Eva Tardos
0
0
In repeated games, such as auctions, players typically use learning algorithms to choose their actions. The use of such autonomous learning agents has become widespread on online platforms. In this paper, we explore the impact of players incorporating monetary transfers into their agents' algorithms, aiming to incentivize behavior in their favor. Our focus is on understanding when players have incentives to make use of monetary transfers, how these payments affect learning dynamics, and what the implications are for welfare and its distribution among the players. We propose a simple game-theoretic model to capture such scenarios. Our results on general games show that in a broad class of games, players benefit from letting their learning agents make payments to other learners during the game dynamics, and that in many cases, this kind of behavior improves welfare for all players. Our results on first- and second-price auctions show that in equilibria of the ``payment policy game,'' the agents' dynamics can reach strong collusive outcomes with low revenue for the auctioneer. These results highlight a challenge for mechanism design in systems where automated learning agents can benefit from interacting with their peers outside the boundaries of the mechanism.
6/3/2024
Truthful Aggregation of LLMs with an Application to Online Advertising
Ermis Soumalias, Michael J. Curry, Sven Seuken
0
0
Online platforms generate hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue per year by showing advertisements alongside their own content. Currently, these platforms are integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) into their services. This makes revenue generation from LLM-generated content the next major challenge in online advertising. We consider a scenario where advertisers aim to influence the responses of an LLM to align with their interests, while platforms seek to maximize advertiser value and ensure user satisfaction. We introduce an auction mechanism for this problem that operates without LLM fine-tuning or access to model weights and provably converges to the output of the optimally fine-tuned LLM for the platform's objective as computational resources increase. Our mechanism ensures that truthful reporting is a dominant strategy for advertisers and it aligns each advertiser's utility with their contribution to social welfare - an essential feature for long-term viability. Additionally, it can incorporate contextual information about the advertisers, significantly accelerating convergence. Via experiments with a publicly available LLM, we show that our mechanism significantly boosts advertiser value and platform revenue, with low computational overhead. While our motivating application is online advertising, our mechanism can be applied in any setting with monetary transfers, making it a general-purpose solution for truthfully aggregating the preferences of self-interested agents over LLM-generated replies.
6/27/2024
🤿
Using deep reinforcement learning to promote sustainable human behaviour on a common pool resource problem
Raphael Koster, Miruna P^islar, Andrea Tacchetti, Jan Balaguer, Leqi Liu, Romuald Elie, Oliver P. Hauser, Karl Tuyls, Matt Botvinick, Christopher Summerfield
0
0
A canonical social dilemma arises when finite resources are allocated to a group of people, who can choose to either reciprocate with interest, or keep the proceeds for themselves. What resource allocation mechanisms will encourage levels of reciprocation that sustain the commons? Here, in an iterated multiplayer trust game, we use deep reinforcement learning (RL) to design an allocation mechanism that endogenously promotes sustainable contributions from human participants to a common pool resource. We first trained neural networks to behave like human players, creating a stimulated economy that allowed us to study how different mechanisms influenced the dynamics of receipt and reciprocation. We then used RL to train a social planner to maximise aggregate return to players. The social planner discovered a redistributive policy that led to a large surplus and an inclusive economy, in which players made roughly equal gains. The RL agent increased human surplus over baseline mechanisms based on unrestricted welfare or conditional cooperation, by conditioning its generosity on available resources and temporarily sanctioning defectors by allocating fewer resources to them. Examining the AI policy allowed us to develop an explainable mechanism that performed similarly and was more popular among players. Deep reinforcement learning can be used to discover mechanisms that promote sustainable human behaviour.
4/24/2024
🛠️
Active Learning for Fair and Stable Online Allocations
Riddhiman Bhattacharya, Thanh Nguyen, Will Wei Sun, Mohit Tawarmalani
0
0
We explore an active learning approach for dynamic fair resource allocation problems. Unlike previous work that assumes full feedback from all agents on their allocations, we consider feedback from a select subset of agents at each epoch of the online resource allocation process. Despite this restriction, our proposed algorithms provide regret bounds that are sub-linear in number of time-periods for various measures that include fairness metrics commonly used in resource allocation problems and stability considerations in matching mechanisms. The key insight of our algorithms lies in adaptively identifying the most informative feedback using dueling upper and lower confidence bounds. With this strategy, we show that efficient decision-making does not require extensive feedback and produces efficient outcomes for a variety of problem classes.
6/24/2024