Using deep reinforcement learning to promote sustainable human behaviour on a common pool resource problem
2404.15059
0
0
🤿
Abstract
A canonical social dilemma arises when finite resources are allocated to a group of people, who can choose to either reciprocate with interest, or keep the proceeds for themselves. What resource allocation mechanisms will encourage levels of reciprocation that sustain the commons? Here, in an iterated multiplayer trust game, we use deep reinforcement learning (RL) to design an allocation mechanism that endogenously promotes sustainable contributions from human participants to a common pool resource. We first trained neural networks to behave like human players, creating a stimulated economy that allowed us to study how different mechanisms influenced the dynamics of receipt and reciprocation. We then used RL to train a social planner to maximise aggregate return to players. The social planner discovered a redistributive policy that led to a large surplus and an inclusive economy, in which players made roughly equal gains. The RL agent increased human surplus over baseline mechanisms based on unrestricted welfare or conditional cooperation, by conditioning its generosity on available resources and temporarily sanctioning defectors by allocating fewer resources to them. Examining the AI policy allowed us to develop an explainable mechanism that performed similarly and was more popular among players. Deep reinforcement learning can be used to discover mechanisms that promote sustainable human behaviour.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Examines how resource allocation mechanisms can encourage sustainable contributions to a common pool resource
- Uses deep reinforcement learning to design an allocation mechanism that promotes cooperative behavior in a multiplayer trust game
- Finds that a redistributive policy that conditions generosity on available resources and temporarily sanctions defectors can lead to a large surplus and an inclusive economy
Plain English Explanation
In this research, the authors explore how to design resource allocation mechanisms that encourage people to cooperate and contribute to a shared resource, rather than just taking from it for themselves. They used a deep reinforcement learning approach to create an allocation system that could learn to promote sustainable contributions.
The researchers first trained AI agents to mimic human behavior in a multiplayer trust game, where people could choose to either share resources or keep them for themselves. This allowed them to study how different allocation mechanisms influenced the dynamics of giving and receiving. [^1]
They then used reinforcement learning to train a "social planner" AI to maximize the overall returns to all the players. The social planner discovered a policy that redistributed resources in a way that led to a large surplus and an economy where everyone gained roughly equally. [^2]
The key was that the AI's generosity was conditional - it would allocate more resources to players who contributed, but temporarily reduce allocations to those who didn't cooperate. This created incentives for players to keep contributing to the common pool.
By analyzing the AI's allocation strategy, the researchers were able to develop an explainable mechanism that performed similarly and was more popular with human players. [^3] This shows how deep learning can be used to design allocation systems that encourage sustainable, cooperative behavior.
[^1]: See this paper for more on using reinforcement learning to model human behavior. [^2]: Compare this to research on learning payment-free resource allocation mechanisms. [^3]: The idea of using AI to discover socially-aligned policies is an active area of research.
Technical Explanation
The authors designed an iterated multiplayer trust game to study how different resource allocation mechanisms impact cooperation and reciprocation. In this game, participants are given a finite pool of resources that they can choose to either keep for themselves or contribute to a common pool.
To model human behavior, the researchers first trained neural networks to play the game like human participants would. This allowed them to simulate an entire economy and observe how different allocation policies influenced the dynamics of giving and receiving over multiple rounds.
They then used deep reinforcement learning to train a "social planner" agent to allocate resources in a way that would maximize the overall returns to all players. This agent discovered a redistributive policy that outperformed baseline mechanisms. [^4]
The key aspects of the social planner's policy were:
- Conditioning its generosity on the available resources - allocating more to contributors when resources were plentiful, but reducing allocations to defectors.
- Temporarily sanctioning players who didn't contribute by giving them fewer resources in subsequent rounds.
This created incentives for players to keep contributing to the common pool, rather than just taking for themselves. Analyzing the social planner's strategy allowed the researchers to develop an explainable allocation mechanism that matched its performance.
[^4]: This relates to research on learning agile soccer skills where reinforcement learning was used to discover complex behaviors.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling demonstration of how deep reinforcement learning can be used to discover resource allocation mechanisms that promote sustainable, cooperative behavior. By first modeling human behavior and then training an agent to optimize for the group's collective welfare, the researchers were able to uncover a nuanced policy that outperformed simpler approaches.
However, it's important to note that this was a simplified, simulated environment. Translating these findings to real-world scenarios with complex human dynamics, varying cultural norms, and scarce resources would likely present additional challenges. Further research is needed to understand how these mechanisms might scale and adapt to more realistic settings.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential ethical concerns around an AI system having control over resource allocation, or the risk of unintended consequences. As this line of research progresses, it will be crucial to carefully consider the societal implications and work to ensure these systems are aligned with human values.
Overall, this work represents an interesting step forward in using AI techniques to tackle the challenge of sustainable resource management. By continuing to explore these ideas with a critical eye, researchers may uncover valuable insights for designing more equitable and cooperative economic systems.
Conclusion
This research demonstrates how deep reinforcement learning can be used to design resource allocation mechanisms that encourage sustainable, cooperative behavior. By first modeling human decision-making in a multiplayer trust game, and then training an AI agent to optimize for the group's collective welfare, the authors were able to discover a nuanced redistribution policy that outperformed simpler approaches.
The key insight was that conditioning the AI's generosity on available resources and temporarily sanctioning defectors creates incentives for players to keep contributing to the common pool. This led to a large surplus and an inclusive economy where everyone gained roughly equally.
While this was a simplified, simulated environment, the findings suggest that AI techniques could be valuable for tackling real-world challenges around sustainable resource management and promoting cooperative, prosocial behavior. As this line of research continues, it will be important to consider the ethical implications and work to ensure these systems are aligned with human values.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Social Choice for AI Alignment: Dealing with Diverse Human Feedback
Vincent Conitzer, Rachel Freedman, Jobst Heitzig, Wesley H. Holliday, Bob M. Jacobs, Nathan Lambert, Milan Moss'e, Eric Pacuit, Stuart Russell, Hailey Schoelkopf, Emanuel Tewolde, William S. Zwicker
0
0
Foundation models such as GPT-4 are fine-tuned to avoid unsafe or otherwise problematic behavior, such as helping to commit crimes or producing racist text. One approach to fine-tuning, called reinforcement learning from human feedback, learns from humans' expressed preferences over multiple outputs. Another approach is constitutional AI, in which the input from humans is a list of high-level principles. But how do we deal with potentially diverging input from humans? How can we aggregate the input into consistent data about collective preferences or otherwise use it to make collective choices about model behavior? In this paper, we argue that the field of social choice is well positioned to address these questions, and we discuss ways forward for this agenda, drawing on discussions in a recent workshop on Social Choice for AI Ethics and Safety held in Berkeley, CA, USA in December 2023.
6/5/2024
🏅
Reinforcement Learning from Diverse Human Preferences
Wanqi Xue, Bo An, Shuicheng Yan, Zhongwen Xu
0
0
The complexity of designing reward functions has been a major obstacle to the wide application of deep reinforcement learning (RL) techniques. Describing an agent's desired behaviors and properties can be difficult, even for experts. A new paradigm called reinforcement learning from human preferences (or preference-based RL) has emerged as a promising solution, in which reward functions are learned from human preference labels among behavior trajectories. However, existing methods for preference-based RL are limited by the need for accurate oracle preference labels. This paper addresses this limitation by developing a method for crowd-sourcing preference labels and learning from diverse human preferences. The key idea is to stabilize reward learning through regularization and correction in a latent space. To ensure temporal consistency, a strong constraint is imposed on the reward model that forces its latent space to be close to the prior distribution. Additionally, a confidence-based reward model ensembling method is designed to generate more stable and reliable predictions. The proposed method is tested on a variety of tasks in DMcontrol and Meta-world and has shown consistent and significant improvements over existing preference-based RL algorithms when learning from diverse feedback, paving the way for real-world applications of RL methods.
5/9/2024
🏅
Reinforcement Learning for Sociohydrology
Tirthankar Roy, Shivendra Srivastava, Beichen Zhang
0
0
In this study, we discuss how reinforcement learning (RL) provides an effective and efficient framework for solving sociohydrology problems. The efficacy of RL for these types of problems is evident because of its ability to update policies in an iterative manner - something that is also foundational to sociohydrology, where we are interested in representing the co-evolution of human-water interactions. We present a simple case study to demonstrate the implementation of RL in a problem of runoff reduction through management decisions related to changes in land-use land-cover (LULC). We then discuss the benefits of RL for these types of problems and share our perspectives on the future research directions in this area.
6/3/2024
Reciprocal Reward Influence Encourages Cooperation From Self-Interested Agents
John L. Zhou, Weizhe Hong, Jonathan C. Kao
0
0
Emergent cooperation among self-interested individuals is a widespread phenomenon in the natural world, but remains elusive in interactions between artificially intelligent agents. Instead, naive reinforcement learning algorithms typically converge to Pareto-dominated outcomes in even the simplest of social dilemmas. An emerging class of opponent-shaping methods have demonstrated the ability to reach prosocial outcomes by influencing the learning of other agents. However, they rely on higher-order derivatives through the predicted learning step of other agents or learning meta-game dynamics, which in turn rely on stringent assumptions over opponent learning rules or exponential sample complexity, respectively. To provide a learning rule-agnostic and sample-efficient alternative, we introduce Reciprocators, reinforcement learning agents which are intrinsically motivated to reciprocate the influence of an opponent's actions on their returns. This approach effectively seeks to modify other agents' $Q$-values by increasing their return following beneficial actions (with respect to the Reciprocator) and decreasing it after detrimental actions, guiding them towards mutually beneficial actions without attempting to directly shape policy updates. We show that Reciprocators can be used to promote cooperation in a variety of temporally extended social dilemmas during simultaneous learning.
6/5/2024