Lessons on Datasets and Paradigms in Machine Learning for Symbolic Computation: A Case Study on CAD

Read original: arXiv:2401.13343 - Published 6/21/2024 by Tereso del R'io, Matthew England
Total Score

0

Lessons on Datasets and Paradigms in Machine Learning for Symbolic Computation: A Case Study on CAD

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of machine learning techniques in the domain of symbolic computation, specifically focusing on a case study related to Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition (CAD).
  • The researchers investigate different machine learning paradigms, including supervised and unsupervised learning, and their applicability to symbolic computation tasks.
  • The paper highlights the challenges and opportunities in leveraging machine learning for symbolic computation, with a particular emphasis on dataset construction and model interpretability.

Plain English Explanation

The paper investigates how machine learning techniques can be applied to the field of symbolic computation, which deals with manipulating and reasoning about mathematical expressions and formulas. The researchers use a case study on Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition (CAD) to explore this topic.

CAD is a method used in computer algebra systems to solve problems involving polynomial equations and inequalities. The researchers explore how machine learning models can be trained to perform CAD-related tasks, such as classifying or regressing mathematical expressions.

One of the key challenges the researchers address is the construction of suitable datasets for training these models. Since symbolic computation tasks often involve complex and structured data, the researchers explore different data augmentation techniques to expand the available training data.

Additionally, the paper highlights the importance of model interpretability in the context of symbolic computation. The researchers investigate ways to make the machine learning models more transparent and understandable, which is crucial for applications in areas like computer algebra systems.

Overall, the paper presents a case study on the intersection of machine learning and symbolic computation, shedding light on the challenges and opportunities in this interdisciplinary field.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores the use of various machine learning paradigms, including supervised and unsupervised learning, for tasks related to symbolic computation, with a focus on a case study involving Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition (CAD).

The researchers investigate the construction of datasets suitable for training machine learning models on symbolic computation tasks. Since symbolic data can be complex and structured, the authors explore different data augmentation techniques, such as transforming mathematical expressions, to expand the available training data.

Additionally, the paper highlights the importance of model interpretability in the context of symbolic computation. The researchers explore approaches to make the machine learning models more interpretable and transparent, which is crucial for applications in areas like computer algebra systems.

The paper also discusses the challenges of incorporating symbolic knowledge into the machine learning models and the potential benefits of leveraging the symbolic capabilities of large language models for symbolic computation tasks.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful exploration of the intersection between machine learning and symbolic computation, highlighting the unique challenges and opportunities in this domain. The researchers acknowledge the difficulties in constructing suitable datasets for symbolic computation tasks and the importance of model interpretability in this context.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the limitations of the proposed approaches or potential issues that may arise in real-world applications. For example, the paper could have discussed the scalability of the data augmentation techniques or the robustness of the interpretability methods when dealing with more complex symbolic expressions.

Additionally, the paper could have examined the broader implications of using machine learning for symbolic computation, such as the impact on the development of computer algebra systems or the potential for machine learning to assist in the discovery of new symbolic laws and mathematical insights.

Conclusion

This paper presents a case study on the use of machine learning techniques for symbolic computation, focusing on the specific domain of Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition. The researchers explore the challenges in dataset construction and the importance of model interpretability in this context.

The work highlights the potential of leveraging machine learning for symbolic computation tasks, but also underscores the unique challenges that arise when applying these techniques to complex, structured data. The insights and lessons learned from this research can inform future efforts to bridge the gap between machine learning and symbolic computation, with the ultimate goal of developing more powerful and versatile tools for mathematical reasoning and problem-solving.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Lessons on Datasets and Paradigms in Machine Learning for Symbolic Computation: A Case Study on CAD
Total Score

0

Lessons on Datasets and Paradigms in Machine Learning for Symbolic Computation: A Case Study on CAD

Tereso del R'io, Matthew England

Symbolic Computation algorithms and their implementation in computer algebra systems often contain choices which do not affect the correctness of the output but can significantly impact the resources required: such choices can benefit from having them made separately for each problem via a machine learning model. This study reports lessons on such use of machine learning in symbolic computation, in particular on the importance of analysing datasets prior to machine learning and on the different machine learning paradigms that may be utilised. We present results for a particular case study, the selection of variable ordering for cylindrical algebraic decomposition, but expect that the lessons learned are applicable to other decisions in symbolic computation. We utilise an existing dataset of examples derived from applications which was found to be imbalanced with respect to the variable ordering decision. We introduce an augmentation technique for polynomial systems problems that allows us to balance and further augment the dataset, improving the machine learning results by 28% and 38% on average, respectively. We then demonstrate how the existing machine learning methodology used for the problem $-$ classification $-$ might be recast into the regression paradigm. While this does not have a radical change on the performance, it does widen the scope in which the methodology can be applied to make choices.

Read more

6/21/2024

From Symbolic Tasks to Code Generation: Diversification Yields Better Task Performers
Total Score

0

From Symbolic Tasks to Code Generation: Diversification Yields Better Task Performers

Dylan Zhang, Justin Wang, Francois Charton

Instruction tuning -- tuning large language models on instruction-output pairs -- is a promising technique for making models better adapted to the real world. Yet, the key factors driving the model's capability to understand and follow instructions not seen during training remain under-explored. Our investigation begins with a series of synthetic experiments within the theoretical framework of a Turing-complete algorithm called Markov algorithm, which allows fine-grained control over the instruction-tuning data. Generalization and robustness with respect to the training distribution emerge once a diverse enough set of tasks is provided, even though very few examples are provided for each task. We extend these initial results to a real-world application scenario of code generation and find that a more diverse instruction set, extending beyond code-related tasks, improves the performance of code generation. Our observations suggest that a more diverse semantic space for instruction-tuning sets greatly improves the model's ability to follow instructions and perform tasks.

Read more

6/3/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Constrained Neural Networks for Interpretable Heuristic Creation to Optimise Computer Algebra Systems

Dorian Florescu, Matthew England

We present a new methodology for utilising machine learning technology in symbolic computation research. We explain how a well known human-designed heuristic to make the choice of variable ordering in cylindrical algebraic decomposition may be represented as a constrained neural network. This allows us to then use machine learning methods to further optimise the heuristic, leading to new networks of similar size, representing new heuristics of similar complexity as the original human-designed one. We present this as a form of ante-hoc explainability for use in computer algebra development.

Read more

4/29/2024

📈

Total Score

0

A Mathematical Model for Curriculum Learning for Parities

Elisabetta Cornacchia, Elchanan Mossel

Curriculum learning (CL) - training using samples that are generated and presented in a meaningful order - was introduced in the machine learning context around a decade ago. While CL has been extensively used and analysed empirically, there has been very little mathematical justification for its advantages. We introduce a CL model for learning the class of k-parities on d bits of a binary string with a neural network trained by stochastic gradient descent (SGD). We show that a wise choice of training examples involving two or more product distributions, allows to reduce significantly the computational cost of learning this class of functions, compared to learning under the uniform distribution. Furthermore, we show that for another class of functions - namely the `Hamming mixtures' - CL strategies involving a bounded number of product distributions are not beneficial.

Read more

4/24/2024