Let's Influence Algorithms Together: How Millions of Fans Build Collective Understanding of Algorithms and Organize Coordinated Algorithmic Actions

Read original: arXiv:2409.10670 - Published 9/18/2024 by Qing Xiao, Yuhang Zheng, Xianzhe Fan, Bingbing Zhang, Zhicong Lu

🤔

Overview

Examines how online fan communities collectively build understanding of algorithms and organize coordinated algorithmic actions
Explores the role of "folk theories of algorithms" in shaping how the public perceives and interacts with algorithmic systems
Discusses the potential for large-scale fan collectives to influence the development and deployment of algorithms

Plain English Explanation

This paper explores how online fan communities work together to understand and influence the algorithms that shape their digital experiences. The researchers examine the concept of "folk theories of algorithms" - the informal, intuitive beliefs and mental models that people develop about how algorithms work, even if they don't have technical knowledge of the underlying systems.

The paper looks at how fan communities, with their large, passionate user bases, can collectively build a shared understanding of algorithms and organize coordinated actions to impact how those algorithms function. For example, fans might discover patterns in how a recommendation algorithm promotes certain content, and then work together to game the system and boost the visibility of content they prefer.

The researchers argue that as algorithms become more pervasive in our digital lives, it's important to understand how the public perceives and engages with them. Fan collectives provide a fascinating case study, as they demonstrate the potential for large groups of users to wield influence over the algorithms that shape their online experiences.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a qualitative study of fan communities and their interactions with algorithms. The researchers conducted in-depth interviews with members of various fan collectives, as well as observing their online discussions and activities.

The study identifies several key ways that fans engage with algorithms:

Building Collective Understanding: Fans pool their individual experiences and observations to collectively develop folk theories about how algorithms work, often in the absence of detailed technical information.
Organizing Coordinated Actions: Fans leverage their collective knowledge to devise strategies for influencing algorithms, such as coordinating efforts to boost the visibility of certain content.
Negotiating Algorithmic Power: Fans navigate the tension between their desire for personalized, curated experiences and their mistrust of the algorithms that enable such experiences.

The researchers argue that these fan-driven interactions with algorithms have important implications for the design and governance of algorithmic systems. The paper suggests that incorporating the folk theories and collective intelligence of user communities could lead to more transparent and responsive algorithmic decision-making.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into how ordinary users engage with and understand algorithmic systems, an area that is often overlooked in technical discussions of algorithm design and implementation.

However, the study is limited by its focus on a specific type of user community - online fan collectives. While these groups demonstrate a high degree of collective organization and algorithmic awareness, it's unclear how generalizable their experiences are to the broader public. Further research is needed to understand how different demographic groups and communities interact with algorithms in their daily lives.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential pitfalls or unintended consequences of large-scale, coordinated algorithmic actions by user collectives. There may be instances where such collective efforts undermine the intended function of algorithms or lead to undesirable outcomes. The researchers could have addressed these concerns more explicitly.

Overall, the paper makes a compelling case for the value of incorporating user perspectives and folk theories into the design and governance of algorithmic systems. As algorithms become increasingly pervasive, understanding how the public perceives and engages with them will be crucial for ensuring that these technologies serve the needs and interests of all users.

Conclusion

This paper offers a fascinating exploration of how online fan communities collectively build understanding of algorithms and organize coordinated actions to influence their functioning. By examining the concept of "folk theories of algorithms," the researchers shed light on the informal, intuitive ways that the public perceives and interacts with algorithmic systems.

The findings suggest that as algorithms become more embedded in our digital lives, it will be crucial to understand and engage with the perspectives and collective intelligence of user communities. Incorporating these grassroots understandings of algorithms could lead to more transparent, responsive, and user-centric algorithmic decision-making.

While the study focuses on the specific context of fan collectives, its insights have broader implications for the design and governance of algorithmic systems in a wide range of domains. As the influence of algorithms continues to grow, the ability of users to collectively build knowledge and organize actions around them may become an increasingly important factor in shaping the digital landscape.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤔

New!Let's Influence Algorithms Together: How Millions of Fans Build Collective Understanding of Algorithms and Organize Coordinated Algorithmic Actions

Qing Xiao, Yuhang Zheng, Xianzhe Fan, Bingbing Zhang, Zhicong Lu

Previous research pays attention to how users strategically understand and consciously interact with algorithms but mainly focuses on an individual level, making it difficult to explore how users within communities could develop a collective understanding of algorithms and organize collective algorithmic actions. Through a two-year ethnography of online fan activities, this study investigates 43 core fans who always organize large-scale fans' collective actions and their corresponding general fan groups. This study aims to reveal how these core fans mobilize millions of general fans through collective algorithmic actions. These core fans reported the rhetorical strategies used to persuade general fans, the steps taken to build a collective understanding of algorithms, and the collaborative processes that adapt collective actions across platforms and cultures. Our findings highlight the key factors that enable computer-supported collective algorithmic actions and extend collective action research into large-scale domain targeting algorithms.

9/18/2024

🐍

Algorithmic Collective Action in Machine Learning

Moritz Hardt, Eric Mazumdar, Celestine Mendler-Dunner, Tijana Zrnic

We initiate a principled study of algorithmic collective action on digital platforms that deploy machine learning algorithms. We propose a simple theoretical model of a collective interacting with a firm's learning algorithm. The collective pools the data of participating individuals and executes an algorithmic strategy by instructing participants how to modify their own data to achieve a collective goal. We investigate the consequences of this model in three fundamental learning-theoretic settings: the case of a nonparametric optimal learning algorithm, a parametric risk minimizer, and gradient-based optimization. In each setting, we come up with coordinated algorithmic strategies and characterize natural success criteria as a function of the collective's size. Complementing our theory, we conduct systematic experiments on a skill classification task involving tens of thousands of resumes from a gig platform for freelancers. Through more than two thousand model training runs of a BERT-like language model, we see a striking correspondence emerge between our empirical observations and the predictions made by our theory. Taken together, our theory and experiments broadly support the conclusion that algorithmic collectives of exceedingly small fractional size can exert significant control over a platform's learning algorithm.

8/9/2024

Algorithmic Collective Action in Recommender Systems: Promoting Songs by Reordering Playlists

Joachim Baumann, Celestine Mendler-Dunner

We investigate algorithmic collective action in transformer-based recommender systems. Our use case is a collective of fans aiming to promote the visibility of an artist by strategically placing one of their songs in the existing playlists they control. The success of the collective is measured by the increase in test-time recommendations of the targeted song. We introduce two easily implementable strategies towards this goal and test their efficacy on a publicly available recommender system model released by a major music streaming platform. Our findings reveal that even small collectives (controlling less than 0.01% of the training data) can achieve up 25x amplification of recommendations by strategically choosing the position at which to insert the song. We then focus on investigating the externalities of the strategy. We find that the performance loss for the platform is negligible, and the recommendations of other songs are largely preserved, minimally impairing the user experience of participants. Moreover, the costs are evenly distributed among other artists. Taken together, our findings demonstrate how collective action strategies can be effective while not necessarily being adversarial, raising new questions around incentives, social dynamics, and equilibria in recommender systems.

4/9/2024

The Role of Learning Algorithms in Collective Action

Omri Ben-Dov, Jake Fawkes, Samira Samadi, Amartya Sanyal

Collective action in machine learning is the study of the control that a coordinated group can have over machine learning algorithms. While previous research has concentrated on assessing the impact of collectives against Bayes (sub-)optimal classifiers, this perspective is limited in that it does not account for the choice of learning algorithm. Since classifiers seldom behave like Bayes classifiers and are influenced by the choice of learning algorithms along with their inherent biases, in this work we initiate the study of how the choice of the learning algorithm plays a role in the success of a collective in practical settings. Specifically, we focus on distributionally robust optimization (DRO), popular for improving a worst group error, and on the ubiquitous stochastic gradient descent (SGD), due to its inductive bias for simpler functions. Our empirical results, supported by a theoretical foundation, show that the effective size and success of the collective are highly dependent on properties of the learning algorithm. This highlights the necessity of taking the learning algorithm into account when studying the impact of collective action in machine learning.

6/5/2024