The Role of Learning Algorithms in Collective Action
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the role of learning algorithms in collective action, such as how they can influence group decision-making and the dynamics of online communities.
- The researchers investigate how algorithmic recommendation systems can promote or suppress the spread of information and the formation of consensus within a population.
- They also analyze the potential fragility of collective decision-making when individuals rely on active learning algorithms to guide their choices.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how the algorithms used in recommendation systems and other AI-powered tools can impact the way people work together and make decisions as a group. The researchers are interested in understanding how these algorithms can shape the flow of information and the emergence of shared opinions within online communities and other collaborative settings.
For example, the paper looks at how algorithmic recommendation systems might influence the spread of songs or other content within a music-sharing platform. The researchers also explore how learning algorithms used by individuals can make group decision-making more fragile - that is, more sensitive to small changes in initial conditions or individual preferences.
Additionally, the paper considers how privacy-aware agents might navigate group decision-making and the potential for AI alignment issues when individual and collective preferences diverge.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a mathematical framework for modeling the role of learning algorithms in collective action. The researchers use a game-theoretic approach to analyze how the design of recommendation systems and the use of active learning by individuals can influence the dynamics of information diffusion and the formation of consensus within a population.
The authors develop a model where agents make decisions based on a combination of their own preferences and the recommendations provided by an algorithmic system. They show that the structure of the recommendation network and the learning strategies employed by agents can have a significant impact on the eventual distribution of opinions and the likelihood of reaching a collective decision.
The paper also examines the fragility of collective decision-making in the presence of active learning algorithms. The researchers demonstrate that when individuals rely too heavily on learning algorithms to guide their choices, small perturbations in the initial conditions or individual preferences can lead to vastly different outcomes, undermining the stability of group decisions.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable theoretical foundation for understanding the interplay between learning algorithms and collective action. However, the analysis is largely abstract and does not directly address the nuances of real-world online communities and decision-making processes.
One limitation of the research is that it assumes a relatively simple model of individual preferences and decision-making. In practice, human behavior and group dynamics are much more complex, and factors such as social influence, cognitive biases, and the presence of polarizing or malicious actors may significantly affect the outcome of collective decision-making.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the ethical implications of using learning algorithms to shape collective action. As these technologies become more prevalent, there is a need to carefully consider the potential for manipulation, the protection of individual privacy, and the alignment of algorithmic systems with broader societal goals.
Further research is needed to validate the theoretical insights presented in this paper and to explore more realistic and nuanced models of how learning algorithms can impact the dynamics of online communities, social movements, and other forms of collective action.
Conclusion
This paper offers a thought-provoking exploration of the role of learning algorithms in collective action. The researchers demonstrate that the design and deployment of these algorithms can have significant implications for the way information spreads, opinions form, and group decisions are made.
While the analysis is largely theoretical, the findings suggest that as learning algorithms become increasingly prevalent in our digital and social landscapes, careful consideration must be given to their potential impacts on collective dynamics. By understanding these mechanisms, researchers and policymakers may be better equipped to harness the power of algorithms to support healthy and resilient forms of collective action, while mitigating the risks of fragility, manipulation, and misalignment with human values.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
The Role of Learning Algorithms in Collective Action
Omri Ben-Dov, Jake Fawkes, Samira Samadi, Amartya Sanyal
Collective action in machine learning is the study of the control that a coordinated group can have over machine learning algorithms. While previous research has concentrated on assessing the impact of collectives against Bayes (sub-)optimal classifiers, this perspective is limited in that it does not account for the choice of learning algorithm. Since classifiers seldom behave like Bayes classifiers and are influenced by the choice of learning algorithms along with their inherent biases, in this work we initiate the study of how the choice of the learning algorithm plays a role in the success of a collective in practical settings. Specifically, we focus on distributionally robust optimization (DRO), popular for improving a worst group error, and on the ubiquitous stochastic gradient descent (SGD), due to its inductive bias for simpler functions. Our empirical results, supported by a theoretical foundation, show that the effective size and success of the collective are highly dependent on properties of the learning algorithm. This highlights the necessity of taking the learning algorithm into account when studying the impact of collective action in machine learning.
Read more6/5/2024
🐍
0
Algorithmic Collective Action in Machine Learning
Moritz Hardt, Eric Mazumdar, Celestine Mendler-Dunner, Tijana Zrnic
We initiate a principled study of algorithmic collective action on digital platforms that deploy machine learning algorithms. We propose a simple theoretical model of a collective interacting with a firm's learning algorithm. The collective pools the data of participating individuals and executes an algorithmic strategy by instructing participants how to modify their own data to achieve a collective goal. We investigate the consequences of this model in three fundamental learning-theoretic settings: the case of a nonparametric optimal learning algorithm, a parametric risk minimizer, and gradient-based optimization. In each setting, we come up with coordinated algorithmic strategies and characterize natural success criteria as a function of the collective's size. Complementing our theory, we conduct systematic experiments on a skill classification task involving tens of thousands of resumes from a gig platform for freelancers. Through more than two thousand model training runs of a BERT-like language model, we see a striking correspondence emerge between our empirical observations and the predictions made by our theory. Taken together, our theory and experiments broadly support the conclusion that algorithmic collectives of exceedingly small fractional size can exert significant control over a platform's learning algorithm.
Read more8/9/2024
🤔
0
New!Let's Influence Algorithms Together: How Millions of Fans Build Collective Understanding of Algorithms and Organize Coordinated Algorithmic Actions
Qing Xiao, Yuhang Zheng, Xianzhe Fan, Bingbing Zhang, Zhicong Lu
Previous research pays attention to how users strategically understand and consciously interact with algorithms but mainly focuses on an individual level, making it difficult to explore how users within communities could develop a collective understanding of algorithms and organize collective algorithmic actions. Through a two-year ethnography of online fan activities, this study investigates 43 core fans who always organize large-scale fans' collective actions and their corresponding general fan groups. This study aims to reveal how these core fans mobilize millions of general fans through collective algorithmic actions. These core fans reported the rhetorical strategies used to persuade general fans, the steps taken to build a collective understanding of algorithms, and the collaborative processes that adapt collective actions across platforms and cultures. Our findings highlight the key factors that enable computer-supported collective algorithmic actions and extend collective action research into large-scale domain targeting algorithms.
Read more9/18/2024
0
Algorithmic Collective Action in Recommender Systems: Promoting Songs by Reordering Playlists
Joachim Baumann, Celestine Mendler-Dunner
We investigate algorithmic collective action in transformer-based recommender systems. Our use case is a collective of fans aiming to promote the visibility of an artist by strategically placing one of their songs in the existing playlists they control. The success of the collective is measured by the increase in test-time recommendations of the targeted song. We introduce two easily implementable strategies towards this goal and test their efficacy on a publicly available recommender system model released by a major music streaming platform. Our findings reveal that even small collectives (controlling less than 0.01% of the training data) can achieve up 25x amplification of recommendations by strategically choosing the position at which to insert the song. We then focus on investigating the externalities of the strategy. We find that the performance loss for the platform is negligible, and the recommendations of other songs are largely preserved, minimally impairing the user experience of participants. Moreover, the costs are evenly distributed among other artists. Taken together, our findings demonstrate how collective action strategies can be effective while not necessarily being adversarial, raising new questions around incentives, social dynamics, and equilibria in recommender systems.
Read more4/9/2024