Leveraging Entailment Judgements in Cross-Lingual Summarisation

Read original: arXiv:2408.00675 - Published 8/2/2024 by Huajian Zhang, Laura Perez-Beltrachini
Total Score

0

Leveraging Entailment Judgements in Cross-Lingual Summarisation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores using entailment judgements to assess the faithfulness of cross-lingual summarization models.
  • It proposes an X-NLI based approach to estimate summary faithfulness by checking if the generated summary entails the source text.
  • The method is evaluated on a new cross-lingual summarization dataset, showing improved faithfulness compared to previous approaches.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at a way to measure how well a summary captures the key information from the original text, even when the summary is in a different language. The approach is based on entailment, which means checking if the summary logically follows from or is implied by the original text.

The researchers developed a system that uses an X-NLI (Cross-lingual Natural Language Inference) model to make these entailment judgements. This allows them to assess the faithfulness of summaries across languages. They evaluated this on a new dataset of cross-lingual summaries, and found it could better capture how well the summaries matched the original texts compared to previous methods.

The key idea is that if a summary truly captures the important points from the source, then the summary should "entail" or logically follow from the original. By checking this entailment relationship, the researchers can get a sense of how faithful or accurate the summaries are, even when the summary is in a different language than the source.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes using an X-NLI (Cross-lingual Natural Language Inference) model to assess the faithfulness of cross-lingual summarization. X-NLI models can determine if a given statement (the "hypothesis") can be inferred from another piece of text (the "premise").

The authors leverage this capability to check if the generated summary (the hypothesis) can be inferred from the original source text (the premise). If the summary can be inferred from the source, it indicates the summary is faithful and captures the key information. Conversely, if the summary cannot be inferred, it suggests the summary is unfaithful and may be missing important details.

The X-NLI based faithfulness estimator is evaluated on a new cross-lingual summarization dataset. Experiments show this approach outperforms previous faithfulness estimation methods in capturing how well the summaries match the source texts, even when the languages differ.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a novel approach to assessing summary faithfulness across languages using natural language inference techniques. This is an important problem, as cross-lingual summarization systems need reliable ways to measure how well they are preserving the key information from the source.

One limitation is that the X-NLI model used is pre-trained, so its performance may be constrained by the data and tasks it was originally trained on. Finetuning or adapting the X-NLI model to the summarization domain could potentially improve the faithfulness estimations.

Additionally, the paper only evaluates the approach on a single cross-lingual dataset. Further testing on a wider range of datasets and language pairs would help validate the generalizability of the findings.

It would also be valuable to better understand the failure cases of the X-NLI based faithfulness estimator. Analyzing the types of summaries it struggles with could inform future improvements to the method.

Overall, the paper presents a promising direction for leveraging language understanding capabilities to improve the evaluation of cross-lingual summarization systems.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach to assessing the faithfulness of cross-lingual summarization models. By using an X-NLI based system to check if the generated summaries can be inferred from the source texts, the method provides a principled way to measure how well the summaries capture the key information, even when the languages differ.

Experiments on a new cross-lingual summarization dataset show this X-NLI based faithfulness estimator outperforms previous approaches. This suggests it could be a valuable tool for developing more reliable and faithful cross-lingual summarization systems. Further research to refine and validate the method across a wider range of datasets and use cases could make important contributions to the field of cross-lingual natural language processing.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Leveraging Entailment Judgements in Cross-Lingual Summarisation
Total Score

0

Leveraging Entailment Judgements in Cross-Lingual Summarisation

Huajian Zhang, Laura Perez-Beltrachini

Synthetically created Cross-Lingual Summarisation (CLS) datasets are prone to include document-summary pairs where the reference summary is unfaithful to the corresponding document as it contains content not supported by the document (i.e., hallucinated content). This low data quality misleads model learning and obscures evaluation results. Automatic ways to assess hallucinations and improve training have been proposed for monolingual summarisation, predominantly in English. For CLS, we propose to use off-the-shelf cross-lingual Natural Language Inference (X-NLI) to evaluate faithfulness of reference and model generated summaries. Then, we study training approaches that are aware of faithfulness issues in the training data and propose an approach that uses unlikelihood loss to teach a model about unfaithful summary sequences. Our results show that it is possible to train CLS models that yield more faithful summaries while maintaining comparable or better informativess.

Read more

8/2/2024

Cross-lingual Cross-temporal Summarization: Dataset, Models, Evaluation
Total Score

0

Cross-lingual Cross-temporal Summarization: Dataset, Models, Evaluation

Ran Zhang, Jihed Ouni, Steffen Eger

While summarization has been extensively researched in natural language processing (NLP), cross-lingual cross-temporal summarization (CLCTS) is a largely unexplored area that has the potential to improve cross-cultural accessibility and understanding. This paper comprehensively addresses the CLCTS task, including dataset creation, modeling, and evaluation. We (1) build the first CLCTS corpus with 328 instances for hDe-En (extended version with 455 instances) and 289 for hEn-De (extended version with 501 instances), leveraging historical fiction texts and Wikipedia summaries in English and German; (2) examine the effectiveness of popular transformer end-to-end models with different intermediate finetuning tasks; (3) explore the potential of GPT-3.5 as a summarizer; (4) report evaluations from humans, GPT-4, and several recent automatic evaluation metrics. Our results indicate that intermediate task finetuned end-to-end models generate bad to moderate quality summaries while GPT-3.5, as a zero-shot summarizer, provides moderate to good quality outputs. GPT-3.5 also seems very adept at normalizing historical text. To assess data contamination in GPT-3.5, we design an adversarial attack scheme in which we find that GPT-3.5 performs slightly worse for unseen source documents compared to seen documents. Moreover, it sometimes hallucinates when the source sentences are inverted against its prior knowledge with a summarization accuracy of 0.67 for plot omission, 0.71 for entity swap, and 0.53 for plot negation. Overall, our regression results of model performances suggest that longer, older, and more complex source texts (all of which are more characteristic for historical language variants) are harder to summarize for all models, indicating the difficulty of the CLCTS task.

Read more

6/4/2024

ConVerSum: A Contrastive Learning based Approach for Data-Scarce Solution of Cross-Lingual Summarization Beyond Direct Equivalents
Total Score

0

ConVerSum: A Contrastive Learning based Approach for Data-Scarce Solution of Cross-Lingual Summarization Beyond Direct Equivalents

Sanzana Karim Lora, Rifat Shahriyar

Cross-Lingual summarization (CLS) is a sophisticated branch in Natural Language Processing that demands models to accurately translate and summarize articles from different source languages. Despite the improvement of the subsequent studies, This area still needs data-efficient solutions along with effective training methodologies. To the best of our knowledge, there is no feasible solution for CLS when there is no available high-quality CLS data. In this paper, we propose a novel data-efficient approach, ConVerSum, for CLS leveraging the power of contrastive learning, generating versatile candidate summaries in different languages based on the given source document and contrasting these summaries with reference summaries concerning the given documents. After that, we train the model with a contrastive ranking loss. Then, we rigorously evaluate the proposed approach against current methodologies and compare it to powerful Large Language Models (LLMs)- Gemini, GPT 3.5, and GPT 4 proving our model performs better for low-resource languages' CLS. These findings represent a substantial improvement in the area, opening the door to more efficient and accurate cross-lingual summarizing techniques.

Read more

8/20/2024

Improving Faithfulness of Large Language Models in Summarization via Sliding Generation and Self-Consistency
Total Score

0

Improving Faithfulness of Large Language Models in Summarization via Sliding Generation and Self-Consistency

Taiji Li, Zhi Li, Yin Zhang

Despite large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in various tasks, they are still suffering from the factual inconsistency problem called hallucinations. For instance, LLMs occasionally generate content that diverges from source article, and prefer to extract information that appears at the beginning and end of the context, especially in long document summarization. Inspired by these findings, we propose to improve the faithfulness of LLMs in summarization by impelling them to process the entire article more fairly and faithfully. We present a novel summary generation strategy, namely SliSum, which exploits the ideas of sliding windows and self-consistency. Specifically, SliSum divides the source article into overlapping windows, and utilizes LLM to generate local summaries for the content in the windows. Finally, SliSum aggregates all local summaries using clustering and majority voting algorithm to produce more faithful summary of entire article. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SliSum significantly improves the faithfulness of diverse LLMs including LLaMA-2, Claude-2 and GPT-3.5 in both short and long text summarization, while maintaining their fluency and informativeness and without additional fine-tuning and resources. We further conduct qualitative and quantitative studies to investigate why SliSum works and impacts of hyperparameters in SliSum on performance.

Read more

8/1/2024