LexBoost: Improving Lexical Document Retrieval with Nearest Neighbors
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes a new method called LexBoost to improve lexical document retrieval using nearest neighbors.
- LexBoost leverages a corpus graph to capture the semantic relationships between documents and enhances lexical retrieval with nearest neighbor information.
- The authors demonstrate that LexBoost outperforms traditional lexical retrieval methods on multiple benchmark datasets.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a technique called LexBoost that aims to improve how search engines or recommendation systems find relevant documents based on the words used in a query. Traditional lexical retrieval methods focus solely on matching the exact words in a query to the words in documents.
LexBoost takes a different approach by also considering the semantic relationships between documents. It builds a corpus graph that captures how the documents are connected based on their content. This allows LexBoost to find documents that may not have the exact words in the query, but are still highly relevant because they are semantically related to the query.
By combining the traditional lexical matching with this nearest neighbor information from the corpus graph, LexBoost is able to outperform standard lexical retrieval methods on several benchmark datasets. This suggests that incorporating semantic relationships between documents can be a valuable addition to lexical search, helping to surface more relevant results.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is the LexBoost method, which combines traditional lexical retrieval with nearest neighbor information from a corpus graph.
Lexical retrieval focuses on matching the exact words in a query to the words in documents. LexBoost enhances this by also considering the semantic relationships between documents, captured in a corpus graph. This graph represents the documents as nodes, with edges connecting documents that are semantically similar.
LexBoost first performs standard lexical retrieval to get an initial set of candidate documents. It then re-ranks these candidates by incorporating their nearest neighbors from the corpus graph. Documents that are semantically close to the top lexical matches are boosted in the final ranking.
The authors demonstrate that this combined lexical-nearest neighbor approach outperforms traditional lexical retrieval on multiple benchmark datasets for document retrieval. This suggests that incorporating semantic relationships between documents can be a valuable addition to lexical search, helping to surface more relevant results.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful approach to improving lexical document retrieval, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Corpus Graph Construction: The effectiveness of LexBoost likely depends on how well the corpus graph captures the true semantic relationships between documents. The paper does not provide detailed insights into the graph construction process, which could be an area for further investigation.
-
Computational Complexity: Incorporating the nearest neighbor information from the corpus graph may add non-trivial computational overhead to the retrieval process. The scalability of this approach for large-scale document collections should be explored.
-
Domain Generalization: The experiments in the paper focus on academic document collections. Further research is needed to understand how well LexBoost generalizes to other domains, such as web pages or social media content.
-
User Evaluation: The paper evaluates LexBoost based on standard IR metrics, but user-centric evaluations could provide additional insights into the practical benefits of this approach for end-users.
Overall, the paper presents a promising direction for enhancing lexical document retrieval, but there are opportunities to further explore the method's limitations and real-world implications.
Conclusion
The LexBoost paper introduces a novel approach to improving lexical document retrieval by leveraging the semantic relationships between documents. By constructing a corpus graph and incorporating nearest neighbor information, LexBoost is able to outperform traditional lexical retrieval methods on several benchmark datasets.
This research highlights the potential value of considering semantic context in addition to lexical matching for information retrieval tasks. As search engines and recommendation systems continue to evolve, techniques like LexBoost may help surface more relevant and meaningful results for users. However, further research is needed to fully understand the method's limitations and practical implications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
LexBoost: Improving Lexical Document Retrieval with Nearest Neighbors
Hrishikesh Kulkarni, Nazli Goharian, Ophir Frieder, Sean MacAvaney
Sparse retrieval methods like BM25 are based on lexical overlap, focusing on the surface form of the terms that appear in the query and the document. The use of inverted indices in these methods leads to high retrieval efficiency. On the other hand, dense retrieval methods are based on learned dense vectors and, consequently, are effective but comparatively slow. Since sparse and dense methods approach problems differently and use complementary relevance signals, approximation methods were proposed to balance effectiveness and efficiency. For efficiency, approximation methods like HNSW are frequently used to approximate exhaustive dense retrieval. However, approximation techniques still exhibit considerably higher latency than sparse approaches. We propose LexBoost that first builds a network of dense neighbors (a corpus graph) using a dense retrieval approach while indexing. Then, during retrieval, we consider both a document's lexical relevance scores and its neighbors' scores to rank the documents. In LexBoost this remarkably simple application of the Cluster Hypothesis contributes to stronger ranking effectiveness while contributing little computational overhead (since the corpus graph is constructed offline). The method is robust across the number of neighbors considered, various fusion parameters for determining the scores, and different dataset construction methods. We also show that re-ranking on top of LexBoost outperforms traditional dense re-ranking and leads to results comparable with higher-latency exhaustive dense retrieval.
Read more9/11/2024
🌐
0
Operational Advice for Dense and Sparse Retrievers: HNSW, Flat, or Inverted Indexes?
Jimmy Lin
Practitioners working on dense retrieval today face a bewildering number of choices. Beyond selecting the embedding model, another consequential choice is the actual implementation of nearest-neighbor vector search. While best practices recommend HNSW indexes, flat vector indexes with brute-force search represent another viable option, particularly for smaller corpora and for rapid prototyping. In this paper, we provide experimental results on the BEIR dataset using the open-source Lucene search library that explicate the tradeoffs between HNSW and flat indexes (including quantized variants) from the perspectives of indexing time, query evaluation performance, and retrieval quality. With additional comparisons between dense and sparse retrievers, our results provide guidance for today's search practitioner in understanding the design space of dense and sparse retrievers. To our knowledge, we are the first to provide operational advice supported by empirical experiments in this regard.
Read more9/11/2024
🚀
0
Efficient Inverted Indexes for Approximate Retrieval over Learned Sparse Representations
Sebastian Bruch, Franco Maria Nardini, Cosimo Rulli, Rossano Venturini
Learned sparse representations form an attractive class of contextual embeddings for text retrieval. That is so because they are effective models of relevance and are interpretable by design. Despite their apparent compatibility with inverted indexes, however, retrieval over sparse embeddings remains challenging. That is due to the distributional differences between learned embeddings and term frequency-based lexical models of relevance such as BM25. Recognizing this challenge, a great deal of research has gone into, among other things, designing retrieval algorithms tailored to the properties of learned sparse representations, including approximate retrieval systems. In fact, this task featured prominently in the latest BigANN Challenge at NeurIPS 2023, where approximate algorithms were evaluated on a large benchmark dataset by throughput and recall. In this work, we propose a novel organization of the inverted index that enables fast yet effective approximate retrieval over learned sparse embeddings. Our approach organizes inverted lists into geometrically-cohesive blocks, each equipped with a summary vector. During query processing, we quickly determine if a block must be evaluated using the summaries. As we show experimentally, single-threaded query processing using our method, Seismic, reaches sub-millisecond per-query latency on various sparse embeddings of the MS MARCO dataset while maintaining high recall. Our results indicate that Seismic is one to two orders of magnitude faster than state-of-the-art inverted index-based solutions and further outperforms the winning (graph-based) submissions to the BigANN Challenge by a significant margin.
Read more4/30/2024
📊
0
Efficient and Interpretable Information Retrieval for Product Question Answering with Heterogeneous Data
Biplob Biswas, Rajiv Ramnath
Expansion-enhanced sparse lexical representation improves information retrieval (IR) by minimizing vocabulary mismatch problems during lexical matching. In this paper, we explore the potential of jointly learning dense semantic representation and combining it with the lexical one for ranking candidate information. We present a hybrid information retrieval mechanism that maximizes lexical and semantic matching while minimizing their shortcomings. Our architecture consists of dual hybrid encoders that independently encode queries and information elements. Each encoder jointly learns a dense semantic representation and a sparse lexical representation augmented by a learnable term expansion of the corresponding text through contrastive learning. We demonstrate the efficacy of our model in single-stage ranking of a benchmark product question-answering dataset containing the typical heterogeneous information available on online product pages. Our evaluation demonstrates that our hybrid approach outperforms independently trained retrievers by 10.95% (sparse) and 2.7% (dense) in MRR@5 score. Moreover, our model offers better interpretability and performs comparably to state-of-the-art cross encoders while reducing response time by 30% (latency) and cutting computational load by approximately 38% (FLOPs).
Read more5/24/2024