Linear multidimensional regression with interactive fixed-effects

Read original: arXiv:2209.11691 - Published 8/27/2024 by Hugo Freeman
Total Score

0

↗️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

This paper investigates a statistical model for analyzing multi-dimensional panel data - that is, data collected over time for multiple subjects across multiple dimensions or features. The key challenge is accounting for unobserved, interactive fixed effects that may influence the relationship between the observed covariates and the outcome variable. The researchers explore two approaches to address this challenge:

  1. Embedding the model within the standard two-dimensional panel framework and deriving conditions under which existing factor structure methods can consistently estimate the model parameters, albeit at a slower rate of convergence.

  2. Developing a kernel-weighted fixed-effects method that is more robust to the multi-dimensional nature of the data and can achieve the optimal parametric rate of consistency under certain conditions.

The paper presents theoretical results and simulations demonstrating the benefits and tradeoffs of these two approaches, as well as an application to estimating the demand elasticity for beer.

Plain English Explanation

Imagine you're studying how various factors influence people's beer consumption over time. You might have data on things like price, income, and other demographic variables for different regions over several years. However, there may be unobserved factors, like local culture or preferences, that also affect beer demand in ways that are difficult to measure directly.

The researchers in this paper developed two statistical methods to help account for these "hidden" or unobserved influences when estimating the effects of the observed factors on beer consumption. The first approach tries to fit the model into a standard two-dimensional panel data framework, with some additional restrictions. The second approach uses a more flexible "kernel-weighted" method that doesn't rely as heavily on assumptions about the structure of the unobserved effects.

The key benefits of these methods are that they can provide more accurate estimates of the relationships between the observed factors (like price) and the outcome (beer consumption), even when there are complex, hard-to-measure influences at play. This could lead to better insights for policymakers or businesses trying to understand consumer behavior.

Technical Explanation

The paper studies a linear and additively separable model for multidimensional panel data of three or more dimensions, where there are unobserved interactive fixed effects that influence the relationship between the observed covariates and the outcome variable.

Two main approaches are considered to account for these unobserved interactive fixed-effects:

  1. Embedding the model within the standard two-dimensional panel framework and deriving restrictions under which the factor structure methods in Bai (2009) can consistently estimate the model parameters, but at slower rates of convergence.

  2. Developing a kernel-weighted fixed-effects method that is more robust to the multidimensional nature of the problem and can achieve the parametric rate of consistency under certain conditions.

Theoretical results and simulations show that the standard two-dimensional panel methods can perform well when the structure of the interactive fixed-effect term is known, but the kernel-weighted method can be advantageous when this structure is unknown.

The researchers also apply the methods to estimate the demand elasticity for beer, demonstrating the practical relevance of the proposed approaches.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thorough theoretical and empirical analysis of the proposed methods. However, a few potential limitations or areas for further research are worth noting:

  1. The assumptions required for the consistency of the factor structure and kernel-weighted methods, while reasonable, may not always be fully satisfied in real-world applications. Exploring the robustness of these methods to violations of the underlying assumptions could be a valuable direction for future research.

  2. The beer demand application, while illustrative, is a relatively narrow use case. Applying the methods to a broader range of empirical settings, such as other economic or social science problems, could provide additional insights into their practical utility and limitations.

  3. The theoretical analysis focuses on asymptotic properties, but the finite-sample performance of the methods may be of interest to applied researchers. Further simulation studies or empirical comparisons with alternative approaches could shed light on the methods' small-sample behavior.

Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the literature on statistical modeling of multidimensional panel data with unobserved interactive effects. The proposed methods offer promising tools for researchers and practitioners seeking to better understand complex, multi-faceted phenomena.

Conclusion

This paper introduces two approaches for modeling multidimensional panel data with unobserved interactive fixed effects. The first approach embeds the model within the standard two-dimensional panel framework, while the second develops a more flexible, kernel-weighted fixed-effects method.

The key advantages of these methods are their ability to consistently estimate the effects of observed covariates on the outcome variable, even in the presence of hard-to-measure, interactive influences. This could lead to improved understanding and more accurate predictions in a variety of empirical settings, such as the study of consumer behavior or economic trends.

The theoretical and simulation results, as well as the illustrative application to beer demand, demonstrate the potential benefits and tradeoffs of the proposed techniques. As with any statistical modeling approach, careful consideration of the underlying assumptions and limitations is essential when applying these methods in practice.

Overall, this research contributes valuable tools and insights for researchers and policymakers seeking to gain deeper insights from complex, multidimensional data.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

↗️

Total Score

0

Linear multidimensional regression with interactive fixed-effects

Hugo Freeman

This paper studies a linear and additively separable model for multidimensional panel data of three or more dimensions with unobserved interactive fixed effects. Two approaches are considered to account for these unobserved interactive fixed-effects when estimating coefficients on the observed covariates. First, the model is embedded within the standard two dimensional panel framework and restrictions are formed under which the factor structure methods in Bai (2009) lead to consistent estimation of model parameters, but at slow rates of convergence. The second approach develops a kernel weighted fixed-effects method that is more robust to the multidimensional nature of the problem and can achieve the parametric rate of consistency under certain conditions. Theoretical results and simulations show some benefits to standard two-dimensional panel methods when the structure of the interactive fixed-effect term is known, but also highlight how the kernel weighted method performs well without knowledge of this structure. The methods are implemented to estimate the demand elasticity for beer.

Read more

8/27/2024

Double Machine Learning meets Panel Data -- Promises, Pitfalls, and Potential Solutions
Total Score

0

Double Machine Learning meets Panel Data -- Promises, Pitfalls, and Potential Solutions

Jonathan Fuhr, Dominik Papies

Estimating causal effect using machine learning (ML) algorithms can help to relax functional form assumptions if used within appropriate frameworks. However, most of these frameworks assume settings with cross-sectional data, whereas researchers often have access to panel data, which in traditional methods helps to deal with unobserved heterogeneity between units. In this paper, we explore how we can adapt double/debiased machine learning (DML) (Chernozhukov et al., 2018) for panel data in the presence of unobserved heterogeneity. This adaptation is challenging because DML's cross-fitting procedure assumes independent data and the unobserved heterogeneity is not necessarily additively separable in settings with nonlinear observed confounding. We assess the performance of several intuitively appealing estimators in a variety of simulations. While we find violations of the cross-fitting assumptions to be largely inconsequential for the accuracy of the effect estimates, many of the considered methods fail to adequately account for the presence of unobserved heterogeneity. However, we find that using predictive models based on the correlated random effects approach (Mundlak, 1978) within DML leads to accurate coefficient estimates across settings, given a sample size that is large relative to the number of observed confounders. We also show that the influence of the unobserved heterogeneity on the observed confounders plays a significant role for the performance of most alternative methods.

Read more

9/4/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Simultaneous inference for generalized linear models with unmeasured confounders

Jin-Hong Du, Larry Wasserman, Kathryn Roeder

Tens of thousands of simultaneous hypothesis tests are routinely performed in genomic studies to identify differentially expressed genes. However, due to unmeasured confounders, many standard statistical approaches may be substantially biased. This paper investigates the large-scale hypothesis testing problem for multivariate generalized linear models in the presence of confounding effects. Under arbitrary confounding mechanisms, we propose a unified statistical estimation and inference framework that harnesses orthogonal structures and integrates linear projections into three key stages. It begins by disentangling marginal and uncorrelated confounding effects to recover the latent coefficients. Subsequently, latent factors and primary effects are jointly estimated through lasso-type optimization. Finally, we incorporate projected and weighted bias-correction steps for hypothesis testing. Theoretically, we establish the identification conditions of various effects and non-asymptotic error bounds. We show effective Type-I error control of asymptotic $z$-tests as sample and response sizes approach infinity. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed method controls the false discovery rate by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure and is more powerful than alternative methods. By comparing single-cell RNA-seq counts from two groups of samples, we demonstrate the suitability of adjusting confounding effects when significant covariates are absent from the model.

Read more

4/23/2024

Double Machine Learning for Static Panel Models with Fixed Effects
Total Score

0

Double Machine Learning for Static Panel Models with Fixed Effects

Paul Clarke, Annalivia Polselli

Recent advances in causal inference have seen the development of methods which make use of the predictive power of machine learning algorithms. In this paper, we use these algorithms to approximate high-dimensional and non-linear nuisance functions of the confounders and double machine learning (DML) to make inferences about the effects of policy interventions from panel data. We propose new estimators by extending correlated random effects, within-group and first-difference estimation for linear models to an extension of Robinson (1988)'s partially linear regression model to static panel data models with individual fixed effects and unspecified non-linear confounding effects. We provide an illustrative example of DML for observational panel data showing the impact of the introduction of the minimum wage on voting behaviour in the UK.

Read more

9/10/2024