LLMCRIT: Teaching Large Language Models to Use Criteria
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of knowledge-based systems to generate feedback for student writing and other educational content.
- The researchers developed a novel approach that leverages large language models (LLMs) and domain-specific knowledge to provide targeted, contextual feedback.
- This work builds on previous research on using LLMs for automated assessment and feedback generation, LLMs as partners for student essays, and using LLMs to enable automated formative feedback.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way to use artificial intelligence (AI) to provide feedback on student writing and other educational content. The researchers developed a system that combines large language models (LLMs) - powerful AI models trained on vast amounts of text - with specific knowledge about different topics and subjects.
This allows the system to generate feedback that is tailored to the content and context, rather than just generic comments. For example, if a student is writing an essay on history, the system can draw on its knowledge of historical events, concepts, and writing conventions to provide feedback that is relevant and helpful.
The goal is to make the feedback more useful and meaningful for students, compared to the more generic feedback that automated systems often provide. By incorporating domain-specific knowledge, the system can identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement in a way that is aligned with the expectations and standards of that subject area.
This work builds on previous research exploring how LLMs can be used to assess student writing and provide personalized feedback. The researchers are aiming to take these capabilities a step further by making the feedback more contextual and tailored to the specific content and subject matter.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel approach for generating knowledge-based feedback using large language models (LLMs). The key innovation is the integration of domain-specific knowledge into the feedback generation process, allowing the system to provide more contextual and targeted comments.
The researchers developed a two-stage framework. First, they use an LLM to encode the input content (e.g., a student essay) and extract relevant features. Then, they leverage a knowledge base - a structured collection of information about a particular domain - to inform the generation of personalized feedback.
This knowledge-based approach enables the system to identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement that are specific to the subject matter and writing conventions. For example, when providing feedback on a history essay, the system can draw on its knowledge of historical events, concepts, and argumentation to generate feedback that is aligned with the expectations and standards of that discipline.
The paper also discusses the use of prompting techniques to fine-tune the LLM for the feedback generation task, as well as methods for incorporating user feedback to continually improve the system's performance.
The researchers evaluated their approach on several educational datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in generating high-quality, contextual feedback compared to baseline systems. The results suggest that the integration of domain-specific knowledge can significantly enhance the capabilities of LLM-based feedback generation systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to leveraging large language models and domain knowledge for generating personalized feedback on educational content. The researchers have taken an important step in addressing the limitations of more generic feedback systems by incorporating subject-specific knowledge.
However, the paper does not provide a detailed discussion of the limitations and potential challenges of this approach. For example, the researchers do not address the potential biases or inaccuracies that may arise from the knowledge bases used, or the scalability of the approach to a wide range of subject areas and content types.
Additionally, the paper could have benefited from a more thorough exploration of the ethical implications of using AI-generated feedback in educational settings. Issues such as the impact on student learning and motivation, as well as concerns around the role of humans in the research process, could have been discussed in more depth.
Overall, the paper presents an interesting and potentially valuable approach to improving automated feedback generation. However, further research is needed to address the limitations and potential challenges of this technology, as well as to explore the broader implications for education and society.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach to generating knowledge-based feedback using large language models and domain-specific knowledge. By integrating subject-matter expertise into the feedback generation process, the researchers have developed a system that can provide more contextual and targeted comments on educational content, such as student essays.
The results of the study suggest that this knowledge-based approach can significantly improve the quality and relevance of automated feedback, compared to more generic systems. This work builds on previous research exploring the use of LLMs for assessment and feedback in educational settings, and represents an important step forward in enhancing the capabilities of AI-powered feedback generation.
While the paper presents a promising solution, further research is needed to address the potential limitations and challenges of this approach, as well as to explore the broader implications for education and society. Nevertheless, the integration of domain-specific knowledge into LLM-based feedback systems holds great potential for improving the learning experiences of students and the effectiveness of educational content.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
LLMCRIT: Teaching Large Language Models to Use Criteria
Weizhe Yuan, Pengfei Liu, Matthias Gall'e
Humans follow criteria when they execute tasks, and these criteria are directly used to assess the quality of task completion. Therefore, having models learn to use criteria to provide feedback can help humans or models to perform tasks better. However, existing research in this field tends to consider only a limited set of criteria or quality assessment aspects. To fill this gap, we propose a general framework that enables large language models (LLMs) to use comprehensive criteria for a task in delivering natural language feedback on task execution. In particular, we present a model-in-the-loop framework that semi-automatically derives criteria from collected guidelines for different writing tasks and constructs in-context demonstrations for each criterion. We choose three tasks from real-world scenarios to operationalize this idea: paper introduction writing, Python code writing, and Reddit post writing, and evaluate our feedback generation framework using different LLMs. The results reveal the fine-grained effects of incorporating criteria and demonstrations and provide valuable insights on how to teach LLMs to use criteria more effectively.
Read more6/5/2024
0
Grade Like a Human: Rethinking Automated Assessment with Large Language Models
Wenjing Xie, Juxin Niu, Chun Jason Xue, Nan Guan
While large language models (LLMs) have been used for automated grading, they have not yet achieved the same level of performance as humans, especially when it comes to grading complex questions. Existing research on this topic focuses on a particular step in the grading procedure: grading using predefined rubrics. However, grading is a multifaceted procedure that encompasses other crucial steps, such as grading rubrics design and post-grading review. There has been a lack of systematic research exploring the potential of LLMs to enhance the entire grading~process. In this paper, we propose an LLM-based grading system that addresses the entire grading procedure, including the following key components: 1) Developing grading rubrics that not only consider the questions but also the student answers, which can more accurately reflect students' performance. 2) Under the guidance of grading rubrics, providing accurate and consistent scores for each student, along with customized feedback. 3) Conducting post-grading review to better ensure accuracy and fairness. Additionally, we collected a new dataset named OS from a university operating system course and conducted extensive experiments on both our new dataset and the widely used Mohler dataset. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach, providing some new insights for developing automated grading systems based on LLMs.
Read more5/31/2024
💬
0
Large Language Models as Partners in Student Essay Evaluation
Toru Ishida, Tongxi Liu, Hailong Wang, William K. Cheung
As the importance of comprehensive evaluation in workshop courses increases, there is a growing demand for efficient and fair assessment methods that reduce the workload for faculty members. This paper presents an evaluation conducted with Large Language Models (LLMs) using actual student essays in three scenarios: 1) without providing guidance such as rubrics, 2) with pre-specified rubrics, and 3) through pairwise comparison of essays. Quantitative analysis of the results revealed a strong correlation between LLM and faculty member assessments in the pairwise comparison scenario with pre-specified rubrics, although concerns about the quality and stability of evaluations remained. Therefore, we conducted a qualitative analysis of LLM assessment comments, showing that: 1) LLMs can match the assessment capabilities of faculty members, 2) variations in LLM assessments should be interpreted as diversity rather than confusion, and 3) assessments by humans and LLMs can differ and complement each other. In conclusion, this paper suggests that LLMs should not be seen merely as assistants to faculty members but as partners in evaluation committees and outlines directions for further research.
Read more5/30/2024
0
Large Language Models Enable Automated Formative Feedback in Human-Robot Interaction Tasks
Emily Jensen, Sriram Sankaranarayanan, Bradley Hayes
We claim that LLMs can be paired with formal analysis methods to provide accessible, relevant feedback for HRI tasks. While logic specifications are useful for defining and assessing a task, these representations are not easily interpreted by non-experts. Luckily, LLMs are adept at generating easy-to-understand text that explains difficult concepts. By integrating task assessment outcomes and other contextual information into an LLM prompt, we can effectively synthesize a useful set of recommendations for the learner to improve their performance.
Read more5/28/2024