LLMs are Not Just Next Token Predictors

Overview

• Large language models (LLMs) are statistical models that learn to predict the next word in a sequence of text through stochastic gradient descent.
• The common view is that LLMs are simply next token predictors, but this view is seen as selling LLMs short.
• There are important explanations of LLM behavior and capabilities that are lost when they are reduced to just next token predictors.
• The paper makes an analogy with a once prominent research program in biology explaining evolution and development from the gene's eye view.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are AI systems that have been trained on massive amounts of text data to predict the next word in a sequence. The way they do this is through a mathematical technique called stochastic gradient descent, which allows the model to learn patterns in the data and make accurate predictions.

While it's true that LLMs are engineered to be good at predicting the next word, the authors of this paper argue that this doesn't fully capture the power and complexity of these models. LLMs as Function Approximators: Terminology, Taxonomy, Questions There are important insights about how LLMs work and what they are capable of that get lost when we view them as just next word predictors.

To illustrate this point, the authors make an analogy to a research program in biology that used to explain evolution and development from the "gene's eye view." LLMs as Universal Auto-Regressive Next-Token Predictors Just as that biological perspective didn't capture the full complexity of living systems, the authors argue that the "next word predictor" view of LLMs is an oversimplification.

Technical Explanation

The paper makes the case that while LLMs are engineered using next token prediction, and trained based on their success at this task, a reduction to just next token predictor sells LLMs short. The authors argue that there are important explanations of LLM behavior and capabilities that are lost when we engage in this kind of reduction.

To illustrate this point, the authors draw an analogy with a once prominent research program in biology that sought to explain evolution and development from the gene's eye view. Bayesian Statistical Modeling of Predictors from LLMs Just as that biological perspective did not capture the full complexity of living systems, the authors argue that the "next word predictor" view of LLMs is an oversimplification that fails to account for the rich dynamics and emergent behaviors of these powerful AI models.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises an important point about the limitations of viewing LLMs solely as next word predictors. Misinforming LLMs: Vulnerabilities, Challenges, Opportunities While this simplification may be useful in some contexts, it can overlook crucial aspects of how these models work and what they are capable of.

The authors' analogy to the "gene's eye view" in biology is thought-provoking, as it suggests that the reductionist approach to understanding LLMs may be missing the forest for the trees. LLMs: Understanding Natural Language Revealed However, the paper does not provide a clear alternative framework for understanding LLMs, leaving the reader to wonder what a more holistic perspective might entail.

Additionally, the paper does not address the practical implications of moving beyond the next word predictor view. It remains to be seen how this shift in perspective might impact the development, deployment, and evaluation of LLMs in real-world applications.

Conclusion

This paper argues that viewing LLMs solely as next word predictors is an oversimplification that fails to capture the rich complexity and emergent behaviors of these powerful AI models. The authors draw an analogy to a similar reductionist approach in biology, suggesting that a more holistic understanding of LLMs is necessary.

While the paper raises important points, it does not provide a clear alternative framework for understanding LLMs. Further research and discussion will be needed to explore how a more nuanced perspective on these models might shape their development and application in the years to come.