Distance-Restricted Explanations: Theoretical Underpinnings & Efficient Implementation
2405.08297
0
0
🔍
Abstract
The uses of machine learning (ML) have snowballed in recent years. In many cases, ML models are highly complex, and their operation is beyond the understanding of human decision-makers. Nevertheless, some uses of ML models involve high-stakes and safety-critical applications. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) aims to help human decision-makers in understanding the operation of such complex ML models, thus eliciting trust in their operation. Unfortunately, the majority of past XAI work is based on informal approaches, that offer no guarantees of rigor. Unsurprisingly, there exists comprehensive experimental and theoretical evidence confirming that informal methods of XAI can provide human-decision makers with erroneous information. Logic-based XAI represents a rigorous approach to explainability; it is model-based and offers the strongest guarantees of rigor of computed explanations. However, a well-known drawback of logic-based XAI is the complexity of logic reasoning, especially for highly complex ML models. Recent work proposed distance-restricted explanations, i.e. explanations that are rigorous provided the distance to a given input is small enough. Distance-restricted explainability is tightly related with adversarial robustness, and it has been shown to scale for moderately complex ML models, but the number of inputs still represents a key limiting factor. This paper investigates novel algorithms for scaling up the performance of logic-based explainers when computing and enumerating ML model explanations with a large number of inputs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Machine learning (ML) models are becoming increasingly complex and their inner workings can be difficult for human decision-makers to understand.
- Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) aims to help humans understand how these complex ML models operate, in order to build trust in their use.
- However, many existing XAI methods are informal and lack rigorous guarantees, potentially leading to erroneous information.
- Logic-based XAI offers a more rigorous approach, but can be computationally complex for highly complex ML models.
- Recent work has proposed "distance-restricted" explanations that are rigorous but only for inputs close to the training data, which limits their applicability.
- This paper investigates new algorithms to scale up logic-based XAI and enable explanations for a larger number of inputs.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models are getting more and more complex, to the point where even the people using them may not fully understand how they work. This can be a problem when these models are used for high-stakes or safety-critical applications.
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) aims to help human decision-makers understand these complex models, so they can trust them more. However, many existing XAI methods are not very rigorous, and can actually give people the wrong information about how the models work.
Logic-based XAI offers a more rigorous, formal approach. But it can be computationally complex, especially for highly intricate ML models.
Recent work has proposed "distance-restricted" explanations - explanations that are rigorous, but only for inputs that are very similar to the model's training data. This helps with the complexity issue, but still limits the number of inputs that can be explained.
This paper looks at new algorithms to make logic-based XAI scale better, so it can provide rigorous explanations for a larger number of inputs, even for very complex machine learning models.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on scaling up the performance of logic-based explainable AI (XAI) methods. Logic-based XAI offers a rigorous, model-based approach to explaining how complex machine learning (ML) models make decisions.
However, a key drawback of logic-based XAI is the computational complexity involved, especially for highly intricate ML models. Recent work has proposed "distance-restricted" explanations, where the explanations are only guaranteed to be rigorous for inputs that are very close to the model's training data.
While this helps with the complexity issue, it still limits the number of inputs that can be explained in a rigorous way. This paper investigates novel algorithms to further scale up logic-based XAI, enabling rigorous explanations for a larger number of inputs, even for highly complex ML models.
The paper first provides a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art in XAI, highlighting the trade-offs between informal, heuristic-based methods and more rigorous, logic-based approaches. It then delves into the technical details of the new algorithms developed to improve the scalability of logic-based XAI.
Through extensive experiments, the paper demonstrates that these new algorithms can significantly expand the set of inputs for which rigorous, logic-based explanations can be computed, compared to prior distance-restricted methods. This represents an important step forward in making XAI techniques more widely applicable, particularly for safety-critical applications of complex ML models.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a strong case for the importance of rigorous, logic-based approaches to explainable AI (XAI), as opposed to more informal heuristic methods. The authors convincingly argue that the latter can provide human decision-makers with erroneous information, undermining trust in the underlying ML models.
However, the authors acknowledge that the computational complexity of logic-based XAI has been a significant limitation, especially for highly complex ML models. While the distance-restricted explanations proposed in prior work help address this issue to some extent, the authors rightly point out that this approach still constrains the set of inputs that can be explained rigorously.
The novel algorithms developed in this paper represent a meaningful advancement, as they enable logic-based XAI to scale to a larger number of inputs, even for intricate ML models. That said, the paper does not delve into the precise computational complexity of these new algorithms, nor does it provide a detailed comparison to other state-of-the-art XAI methods beyond the distance-restricted approach.
Additionally, the paper's evaluation is primarily focused on the performance and scalability of the logic-based XAI system, without much discussion of the actual quality or interpretability of the generated explanations from an end-user perspective. Further research may be needed to fully assess the practical utility of these logic-based XAI techniques for human decision-makers.
Conclusion
This paper tackles an important challenge in the field of explainable AI (XAI): enabling rigorous, logic-based explanations of complex machine learning models at scale. By developing novel algorithms to improve the computational efficiency of logic-based XAI, the authors have taken a significant step towards making these techniques more widely applicable, particularly for safety-critical applications.
While the paper does not address all the potential limitations of logic-based XAI, it represents a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to build trust and transparency in the use of advanced AI systems. As machine learning models continue to grow in complexity, the need for robust, interpretable explanations will only become more pressing. This work helps advance the state of the art in this critical area of research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤔
Logic-Based Explainability: Past, Present & Future
Joao Marques-Silva
0
0
In recent years, the impact of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) in society has been absolutely remarkable. This impact is expected to continue in the foreseeable future. However,the adoption of AI/ML is also a cause of grave concern. The operation of the most advances AI/ML models is often beyond the grasp of human decision makers. As a result, decisions that impact humans may not be understood and may lack rigorous validation. Explainable AI (XAI) is concerned with providing human decision-makers with understandable explanations for the predictions made by ML models. As a result, XAI is a cornerstone of trustworthy AI. Despite its strategic importance, most work on XAI lacks rigor, and so its use in high-risk or safety-critical domains serves to foster distrust instead of contributing to build much-needed trust. Logic-based XAI has recently emerged as a rigorous alternative to those other non-rigorous methods of XAI. This paper provides a technical survey of logic-based XAI, its origins, the current topics of research, and emerging future topics of research. The paper also highlights the many myths that pervade non-rigorous approaches for XAI.
6/19/2024
Privacy Implications of Explainable AI in Data-Driven Systems
Fatima Ezzeddine
0
0
Machine learning (ML) models, demonstrably powerful, suffer from a lack of interpretability. The absence of transparency, often referred to as the black box nature of ML models, undermines trust and urges the need for efforts to enhance their explainability. Explainable AI (XAI) techniques address this challenge by providing frameworks and methods to explain the internal decision-making processes of these complex models. Techniques like Counterfactual Explanations (CF) and Feature Importance play a crucial role in achieving this goal. Furthermore, high-quality and diverse data remains the foundational element for robust and trustworthy ML applications. In many applications, the data used to train ML and XAI explainers contain sensitive information. In this context, numerous privacy-preserving techniques can be employed to safeguard sensitive information in the data, such as differential privacy. Subsequently, a conflict between XAI and privacy solutions emerges due to their opposing goals. Since XAI techniques provide reasoning for the model behavior, they reveal information relative to ML models, such as their decision boundaries, the values of features, or the gradients of deep learning models when explanations are exposed to a third entity. Attackers can initiate privacy breaching attacks using these explanations, to perform model extraction, inference, and membership attacks. This dilemma underscores the challenge of finding the right equilibrium between understanding ML decision-making and safeguarding privacy.
6/26/2024
🔄
LLMs for XAI: Future Directions for Explaining Explanations
Alexandra Zytek, Sara Pid`o, Kalyan Veeramachaneni
0
0
In response to the demand for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), we investigate the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to transform ML explanations into natural, human-readable narratives. Rather than directly explaining ML models using LLMs, we focus on refining explanations computed using existing XAI algorithms. We outline several research directions, including defining evaluation metrics, prompt design, comparing LLM models, exploring further training methods, and integrating external data. Initial experiments and user study suggest that LLMs offer a promising way to enhance the interpretability and usability of XAI.
5/13/2024
The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations
Vinitra Swamy, Jibril Frej, Tanja Kaser
0
0
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) plays a crucial role in enabling human understanding and trust in deep learning systems. As models get larger, more ubiquitous, and pervasive in aspects of daily life, explainability is necessary to minimize adverse effects of model mistakes. Unfortunately, current approaches in human-centric XAI (e.g. predictive tasks in healthcare, education, or personalized ads) tend to rely on a single post-hoc explainer, whereas recent work has identified systematic disagreement between post-hoc explainers when applied to the same instances of underlying black-box models. In this paper, we therefore present a call for action to address the limitations of current state-of-the-art explainers. We propose a shift from post-hoc explainability to designing interpretable neural network architectures. We identify five needs of human-centric XAI (real-time, accurate, actionable, human-interpretable, and consistent) and propose two schemes for interpretable-by-design neural network workflows (adaptive routing with InterpretCC and temporal diagnostics with I2MD). We postulate that the future of human-centric XAI is neither in explaining black-boxes nor in reverting to traditional, interpretable models, but in neural networks that are intrinsically interpretable.
5/29/2024