Local Causal Discovery for Estimating Causal Effects
2302.08070
0
0
📉
Abstract
Even when the causal graph underlying our data is unknown, we can use observational data to narrow down the possible values that an average treatment effect (ATE) can take by (1) identifying the graph up to a Markov equivalence class; and (2) estimating that ATE for each graph in the class. While the PC algorithm can identify this class under strong faithfulness assumptions, it can be computationally prohibitive. Fortunately, only the local graph structure around the treatment is required to identify the set of possible ATE values, a fact exploited by local discovery algorithms to improve computational efficiency. In this paper, we introduce Local Discovery using Eager Collider Checks (LDECC), a new local causal discovery algorithm that leverages unshielded colliders to orient the treatment's parents differently from existing methods. We show that there exist graphs where LDECC exponentially outperforms existing local discovery algorithms and vice versa. Moreover, we show that LDECC and existing algorithms rely on different faithfulness assumptions, leveraging this insight to weaken the assumptions for identifying the set of possible ATE values.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Even when the underlying causal graph is unknown, observational data can be used to narrow down the possible values of the average treatment effect (ATE)
- This is done by (1) identifying the graph up to a Markov equivalence class, and (2) estimating the ATE for each graph in the class
- The PC algorithm can identify this class under strong faithfulness assumptions, but it can be computationally expensive
- Local discovery algorithms can improve computational efficiency by focusing only on the local graph structure around the treatment
Plain English Explanation
When we have observational data (data collected without actively intervening in the system), we can still learn about the causal relationships between different variables, even if we don't know the exact causal graph underlying the data. This is done by identifying the graph up to a Markov equivalence class - basically, finding a set of possible graphs that are all consistent with the observed data. Then, we can estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) for each of those possible graphs.
The PC algorithm is one way to identify this Markov equivalence class, but it can be computationally expensive, especially for large graphs. Fortunately, we don't actually need the full global graph structure to estimate the set of possible ATE values. Local discovery algorithms can focus just on the local neighborhood around the treatment variable, which is much faster to compute.
Technical Explanation
In this paper, the authors introduce a new local causal discovery algorithm called Local Discovery using Eager Collider Checks (LDECC). LDECC leverages unshielded colliders (a specific type of causal structure) to orient the parents of the treatment variable differently than existing local discovery methods.
The authors show that there are cases where LDECC can exponentially outperform other local discovery algorithms, and vice versa. They also demonstrate that LDECC and existing algorithms rely on different faithfulness assumptions - that is, assumptions about the relationship between the causal graph and the observed data. By understanding these differing assumptions, the authors are able to weaken the overall assumptions required to identify the set of possible ATE values.
Critical Analysis
The paper introduces an interesting new local causal discovery algorithm and provides a thorough theoretical analysis of its performance relative to existing methods. However, the authors do not present any empirical evaluation of LDECC on real-world datasets. While the theoretical results are promising, it would be valuable to see how the algorithm performs in practice, especially on larger and more complex causal graphs.
Additionally, the authors note that LDECC and other local discovery algorithms rely on different faithfulness assumptions. It would be useful for the authors to further explore the practical implications of these differing assumptions, such as how they might affect the robustness of the estimated ATE bounds in the face of real-world data challenges like measurement error or hidden confounders.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new local causal discovery algorithm, LDECC, that can be used to efficiently estimate the set of possible average treatment effects (ATEs) when the underlying causal graph is unknown. By focusing only on the local neighborhood of the treatment variable, LDECC can be computationally faster than global discovery methods like the PC algorithm. The authors also show that LDECC and existing local discovery algorithms make different faithfulness assumptions, which they use to weaken the overall assumptions required for identifying the set of possible ATE values.
While the theoretical results are promising, further empirical evaluation and exploration of the practical implications of the differing faithfulness assumptions would be valuable next steps to fully understand the strengths and limitations of LDECC and local causal discovery methods in general.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Adaptive Online Experimental Design for Causal Discovery
Muhammad Qasim Elahi, Lai Wei, Murat Kocaoglu, Mahsa Ghasemi
0
0
Causal discovery aims to uncover cause-and-effect relationships encoded in causal graphs by leveraging observational, interventional data, or their combination. The majority of existing causal discovery methods are developed assuming infinite interventional data. We focus on data interventional efficiency and formalize causal discovery from the perspective of online learning, inspired by pure exploration in bandit problems. A graph separating system, consisting of interventions that cut every edge of the graph at least once, is sufficient for learning causal graphs when infinite interventional data is available, even in the worst case. We propose a track-and-stop causal discovery algorithm that adaptively selects interventions from the graph separating system via allocation matching and learns the causal graph based on sampling history. Given any desired confidence value, the algorithm determines a termination condition and runs until it is met. We analyze the algorithm to establish a problem-dependent upper bound on the expected number of required interventional samples. Our proposed algorithm outperforms existing methods in simulations across various randomly generated causal graphs. It achieves higher accuracy, measured by the structural hamming distance (SHD) between the learned causal graph and the ground truth, with significantly fewer samples.
6/26/2024
🌿
Hybrid Global Causal Discovery with Local Search
Sujai Hiremath, Jacqueline R. M. A. Maasch, Mengxiao Gao, Promit Ghosal, Kyra Gan
0
0
Learning the unique directed acyclic graph corresponding to an unknown causal model is a challenging task. Methods based on functional causal models can identify a unique graph, but either suffer from the curse of dimensionality or impose strong parametric assumptions. To address these challenges, we propose a novel hybrid approach for global causal discovery in observational data that leverages local causal substructures. We first present a topological sorting algorithm that leverages ancestral relationships in linear structural equation models to establish a compact top-down hierarchical ordering, encoding more causal information than linear orderings produced by existing methods. We demonstrate that this approach generalizes to nonlinear settings with arbitrary noise. We then introduce a nonparametric constraint-based algorithm that prunes spurious edges by searching for local conditioning sets, achieving greater accuracy than current methods. We provide theoretical guarantees for correctness and worst-case polynomial time complexities, with empirical validation on synthetic data.
5/24/2024
🌿
Towards Bounding Causal Effects under Markov Equivalence
Alexis Bellot
0
0
Predicting the effect of unseen interventions is a fundamental research question across the data sciences. It is well established that in general such questions cannot be answered definitively from observational data. This realization has fuelled a growing literature introducing various identifying assumptions, for example in the form of a causal diagram among relevant variables. In practice, this paradigm is still too rigid for many practical applications as it is generally not possible to confidently delineate the true causal diagram. In this paper, we consider the derivation of bounds on causal effects given only observational data. We propose to take as input a less informative structure known as a Partial Ancestral Graph, which represents a Markov equivalence class of causal diagrams and is learnable from data. In this more ``data-driven'' setting, we provide a systematic algorithm to derive bounds on causal effects that exploit the invariant properties of the equivalence class, and that can be computed analytically. We demonstrate our method with synthetic and real data examples.
5/27/2024
🌿
Local Discovery by Partitioning: Polynomial-Time Causal Discovery Around Exposure-Outcome Pairs
Jacqueline Maasch, Weishen Pan, Shantanu Gupta, Volodymyr Kuleshov, Kyra Gan, Fei Wang
0
0
Causal discovery is crucial for causal inference in observational studies, as it can enable the identification of valid adjustment sets (VAS) for unbiased effect estimation. However, global causal discovery is notoriously hard in the nonparametric setting, with exponential time and sample complexity in the worst case. To address this, we propose local discovery by partitioning (LDP): a local causal discovery method that is tailored for downstream inference tasks without requiring parametric and pretreatment assumptions. LDP is a constraint-based procedure that returns a VAS for an exposure-outcome pair under latent confounding, given sufficient conditions. The total number of independence tests performed is worst-case quadratic with respect to the cardinality of the variable set. Asymptotic theoretical guarantees are numerically validated on synthetic graphs. Adjustment sets from LDP yield less biased and more precise average treatment effect estimates than baseline discovery algorithms, with LDP outperforming on confounder recall, runtime, and test count for VAS discovery. Notably, LDP ran at least 1300x faster than baselines on a benchmark.
6/4/2024