Logically Consistent Language Models via Neuro-Symbolic Integration
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes a neuro-symbolic approach to developing language models that are logically consistent.
- This involves integrating probabilistic reasoning with neural language models to ensure the generated text adheres to logical rules and principles.
- The goal is to create more reliable and trustworthy language models that can perform logical reasoning tasks accurately.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers are trying to build language models that not only generate human-like text, but also follow logical rules and principles. Current language models can sometimes produce text that contradicts itself or violates logical reasoning.
To address this, the researchers combine neural language models with probabilistic reasoning. This allows the model to consider the logical implications of the text it generates, ensuring it remains consistent and coherent.
By integrating logical reasoning into the language model, the researchers aim to create AI systems that can reliably reason about concepts and produce text that aligns with logical principles. This could lead to more trustworthy and useful language models for various applications.
Technical Explanation
The key idea behind this work is to make language models logically consistent by combining neural networks with probabilistic reasoning. Current language models can sometimes generate text that violates logical rules, leading to inconsistencies.
The researchers propose a neuro-symbolic integration approach to address this. This involves training the language model to not only produce fluent text, but also reason about the logical implications of the text it generates. The model learns to consider logical constraints and principles during the text generation process.
Specifically, the researchers use a hybrid architecture that integrates a neural language model with a probabilistic logic reasoner. The neural model generates the text, while the logic reasoner evaluates the logical consistency of the generated text. This allows the model to maintain logical coherence while still producing natural-sounding language.
The researchers evaluate their approach on a range of tasks that require logical reasoning, such as question answering and textual entailment. Their results demonstrate that the neuro-symbolic model outperforms standard language models in terms of logical consistency, while still maintaining strong performance on natural language generation.
Critical Analysis
The proposed approach represents an important step towards building more reliable and trustworthy language models. By integrating logical reasoning, the researchers are able to address a key limitation of current language models - their tendency to produce logically inconsistent text.
However, the researchers acknowledge that their approach is not a panacea. The neuro-symbolic integration still has some limitations, such as the potential for increased computational complexity and the challenge of scaling the approach to very large language models.
Additionally, the researchers note that their evaluation primarily focuses on logical reasoning tasks, and more work is needed to understand the broader implications of their approach for real-world language understanding and generation.
Overall, this research highlights the importance of combining neural and symbolic approaches to build AI systems that can reason more reliably and consistently. As language models become more powerful and widely deployed, ensuring their logical coherence will be crucial for building trust and reliability.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to developing logically consistent language models by integrating neural networks with probabilistic reasoning. The researchers show that this neuro-symbolic integration can improve the logical coherence of generated text while maintaining strong performance on natural language tasks.
While the approach has some limitations, it represents an important step towards building more reliable and trustworthy AI systems that can reason about language in a logically principled way. As language models become increasingly ubiquitous, the ability to ensure their logical consistency will be essential for their safe and effective deployment in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Logically Consistent Language Models via Neuro-Symbolic Integration
Diego Calanzone, Stefano Teso, Antonio Vergari
Large language models (LLMs) are a promising venue for natural language understanding and generation. However, current LLMs are far from reliable: they are prone to generating non-factual information and, more crucially, to contradicting themselves when prompted to reason about relations between entities of the world. These problems are currently addressed with large scale fine-tuning or by delegating reasoning to external tools. In this work, we strive for a middle ground and introduce a loss based on neuro-symbolic reasoning that teaches an LLM to be logically consistent with an external set of facts and rules and improves self-consistency even when the LLM is fine-tuned on a limited set of facts. Our approach also allows to easily combine multiple logical constraints at once in a principled way, delivering LLMs that are more consistent w.r.t. all constraints and improve over several baselines w.r.t. a given constraint. Moreover, our method allows LLMs to extrapolate to unseen but semantically similar factual knowledge, represented in unseen datasets, more systematically.
Read more9/24/2024
0
Towards Logically Consistent Language Models via Probabilistic Reasoning
Diego Calanzone, Stefano Teso, Antonio Vergari
Large language models (LLMs) are a promising venue for natural language understanding and generation tasks. However, current LLMs are far from reliable: they are prone to generate non-factual information and, more crucially, to contradict themselves when prompted to reason about beliefs of the world. These problems are currently addressed with large scale fine-tuning or by delegating consistent reasoning to external tools. In this work, we strive for a middle ground and introduce a training objective based on principled probabilistic reasoning that teaches a LLM to be consistent with external knowledge in the form of a set of facts and rules. Fine-tuning with our loss on a limited set of facts enables our LLMs to be more logically consistent than previous baselines and allows them to extrapolate to unseen but semantically similar factual knowledge more systematically.
Read more4/22/2024
0
Reliable Reasoning Beyond Natural Language
Nasim Borazjanizadeh, Steven T. Piantadosi
Despite their linguistic competence, Large Language models (LLMs) often exhibit limitations in their ability to reason reliably and flexibly. To address this, we propose a neurosymbolic approach that prompts LLMs to extract and encode all relevant information from a problem statement as logical code statements, and then use a logic programming language (Prolog) to conduct the iterative computations of explicit deductive reasoning. Our approach significantly enhances the performance of LLMs on the standard mathematical reasoning benchmark, GSM8k, and the Navigate dataset from the BIG-bench dataset. Additionally, we introduce a novel dataset, the Non-Linear Reasoning (NLR) dataset, consisting of 55 unique word problems that target the shortcomings of the next token prediction paradigm of LLMs and require complex non-linear reasoning but only basic arithmetic skills to solve. Our findings demonstrate that the integration of Prolog enables LLMs to achieve high performance on the NLR dataset, which even the most advanced language models (including GPT4) fail to solve using text only.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Are Large Language Models Really Good Logical Reasoners? A Comprehensive Evaluation and Beyond
Fangzhi Xu, Qika Lin, Jiawei Han, Tianzhe Zhao, Jun Liu, Erik Cambria
Logical reasoning consistently plays a fundamental and significant role in the domains of knowledge engineering and artificial intelligence. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a noteworthy innovation in natural language processing (NLP). However, the question of whether LLMs can effectively address the task of logical reasoning, which requires gradual cognitive inference similar to human intelligence, remains unanswered. To this end, we aim to bridge this gap and provide comprehensive evaluations in this paper. Firstly, to offer systematic evaluations, we select fifteen typical logical reasoning datasets and organize them into deductive, inductive, abductive and mixed-form reasoning settings. Considering the comprehensiveness of evaluations, we include 3 early-era representative LLMs and 4 trending LLMs. Secondly, different from previous evaluations relying only on simple metrics (e.g., emph{accuracy}), we propose fine-level evaluations in objective and subjective manners, covering both answers and explanations, including emph{answer correctness}, emph{explain correctness}, emph{explain completeness} and emph{explain redundancy}. Additionally, to uncover the logical flaws of LLMs, problematic cases will be attributed to five error types from two dimensions, i.e., emph{evidence selection process} and emph{reasoning process}. Thirdly, to avoid the influences of knowledge bias and concentrate purely on benchmarking the logical reasoning capability of LLMs, we propose a new dataset with neutral content. Based on the in-depth evaluations, this paper finally forms a general evaluation scheme of logical reasoning capability from six dimensions (i.e., emph{Correct}, emph{Rigorous}, emph{Self-aware}, emph{Active}, emph{Oriented} and emph{No hallucination}). It reflects the pros and cons of LLMs and gives guiding directions for future works.
Read more9/17/2024