Looks can be Deceptive: Distinguishing Repetition Disfluency from Reduplication
0
🐍
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a large-scale study of the differences between
reduplication andrepetition in speech using computational linguistics. - The researchers introduce a new dataset, IndicRedRep, which contains text in Hindi, Telugu, and Marathi annotated with reduplication and repetition at the word level.
- The paper evaluates transformer-based models for classifying tokens as either reduplication or repetition, achieving strong performance across the three languages.
Plain English Explanation
Reduplication and repetition may look similar on the surface, but they serve different linguistic purposes.
This research aims to computationally distinguish between these two phenomena. The researchers created a new dataset, IndicRedRep, containing text in three Indian languages with annotations marking whether each repeated word is a deliberate reduplication or an accidental repetition.
Using this dataset, the researchers trained machine learning models to automatically classify tokens as either reduplication or repetition. Their best-performing models achieved around 85% accuracy in correctly identifying the type of word repetition across the three languages.
This work provides valuable insights into the nuanced ways people use repetition in natural speech, with implications for applications that handle conversational data or aim to generate more natural-sounding text.
Technical Explanation
The researchers collected a dataset called IndicRedRep, which contains text in Hindi, Telugu, and Marathi annotated with reduplication and repetition at the word level. They used the Reparandum-Interregnum-Repair (RIR) structure, a common framework for disfluency analysis, to distinguish between deliberate reduplications and unintentional repetitions.
The team then evaluated several transformer-based models for multi-class classification of tokens as reduplication, repetition, or neither. Their best-performing models achieved macro F1 scores of up to 85.62% in Hindi, 83.95% in Telugu, and 84.82% in Marathi.
These results demonstrate the feasibility of computationally distinguishing between reduplication and repetition, which have implications for language modeling and other NLP tasks that involve processing real-world conversational data. The researchers note that further work is needed to scale these techniques to more languages.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed study on an interesting linguistic phenomenon. The creation of the IndicRedRep dataset is a valuable contribution that will enable further research in this area.
One potential limitation is the focus on only three Indian languages. While these are important languages, expanding the research to a wider range of languages could yield additional insights and test the generalizability of the models.
Additionally, the paper does not explore potential real-world applications or implications of this work beyond the technical contributions. Discussing how these techniques could be used to improve language understanding, generation, or accessibility systems would have strengthened the paper's impact.
Overall, this is a solid piece of research that advances our understanding of the nuanced differences between reduplication and repetition in natural speech. Researchers and practitioners in the field of natural language processing should find this work informative and inspiring for future studies.
Conclusion
This paper presents the first large-scale computational study of reduplication and repetition in speech, two related but distinct linguistic phenomena. By introducing the IndicRedRep dataset and developing effective transformer-based models for classifying token-level repetitions, the researchers have made important contributions to our understanding of how people use repetition in natural language.
The strong performance of the models across three Indian languages suggests that these techniques could be scalable and applicable to a wide range of languages and applications. Future work exploring how to leverage this understanding of reduplication and repetition could lead to improvements in areas like conversational AI, language generation, and accessibility tools.
Overall, this research provides valuable insights into the nuanced ways people use repetition in speech, with implications for advancing natural language processing capabilities and our understanding of human language use.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🐍
0
Looks can be Deceptive: Distinguishing Repetition Disfluency from Reduplication
Arif Ahmad, Mothika Gayathri Khyathi, Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Reduplication and repetition, though similar in form, serve distinct linguistic purposes. Reduplication is a deliberate morphological process used to express grammatical, semantic, or pragmatic nuances, while repetition is often unintentional and indicative of disfluency. This paper presents the first large-scale study of reduplication and repetition in speech using computational linguistics. We introduce IndicRedRep, a new publicly available dataset containing Hindi, Telugu, and Marathi text annotated with reduplication and repetition at the word level. We evaluate transformer-based models for multi-class reduplication and repetition token classification, utilizing the Reparandum-Interregnum-Repair structure to distinguish between the two phenomena. Our models achieve macro F1 scores of up to 85.62% in Hindi, 83.95% in Telugu, and 84.82% in Marathi for reduplication-repetition classification.
Read more7/12/2024
🌿
0
On the Information Redundancy in Non-Autoregressive Translation
Zhihao Wang, Longyue Wang, Jinsong Su, Junfeng Yao, Zhaopeng Tu
Token repetition is a typical form of multi-modal problem in fully non-autoregressive translation (NAT). In this work, we revisit the multi-modal problem in recently proposed NAT models. Our study reveals that these advanced models have introduced other types of information redundancy errors, which cannot be measured by the conventional metric - the continuous repetition ratio. By manually annotating the NAT outputs, we identify two types of information redundancy errors that correspond well to lexical and reordering multi-modality problems. Since human annotation is time-consuming and labor-intensive, we propose automatic metrics to evaluate the two types of redundant errors. Our metrics allow future studies to evaluate new methods and gain a more comprehensive understanding of their effectiveness.
Read more5/7/2024
0
Continual Learning in the Presence of Repetition
Hamed Hemati, Lorenzo Pellegrini, Xiaotian Duan, Zixuan Zhao, Fangfang Xia, Marc Masana, Benedikt Tscheschner, Eduardo Veas, Yuxiang Zheng, Shiji Zhao, Shao-Yuan Li, Sheng-Jun Huang, Vincenzo Lomonaco, Gido M. van de Ven
Continual learning (CL) provides a framework for training models in ever-evolving environments. Although re-occurrence of previously seen objects or tasks is common in real-world problems, the concept of repetition in the data stream is not often considered in standard benchmarks for CL. Unlike with the rehearsal mechanism in buffer-based strategies, where sample repetition is controlled by the strategy, repetition in the data stream naturally stems from the environment. This report provides a summary of the CLVision challenge at CVPR 2023, which focused on the topic of repetition in class-incremental learning. The report initially outlines the challenge objective and then describes three solutions proposed by finalist teams that aim to effectively exploit the repetition in the stream to learn continually. The experimental results from the challenge highlight the effectiveness of ensemble-based solutions that employ multiple versions of similar modules, each trained on different but overlapping subsets of classes. This report underscores the transformative potential of taking a different perspective in CL by employing repetition in the data stream to foster innovative strategy design.
Read more5/8/2024
0
SoftDedup: an Efficient Data Reweighting Method for Speeding Up Language Model Pre-training
Nan He, Weichen Xiong, Hanwen Liu, Yi Liao, Lei Ding, Kai Zhang, Guohua Tang, Xiao Han, Wei Yang
The effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) is often hindered by duplicated data in their extensive pre-training datasets. Current approaches primarily focus on detecting and removing duplicates, which risks the loss of valuable information and neglects the varying degrees of duplication. To address this, we propose a soft deduplication method that maintains dataset integrity while selectively reducing the sampling weight of data with high commonness. Central to our approach is the concept of data commonness, a metric we introduce to quantify the degree of duplication by measuring the occurrence probabilities of samples using an n-gram model. Empirical analysis shows that this method significantly improves training efficiency, achieving comparable perplexity scores with at least a 26% reduction in required training steps. Additionally, it enhances average few-shot downstream accuracy by 1.77% when trained for an equivalent duration. Importantly, this approach consistently improves performance, even on rigorously deduplicated datasets, indicating its potential to complement existing methods and become a standard pre-training process for LLMs.
Read more7/10/2024