Losing Visual Needles in Image Haystacks: Vision Language Models are Easily Distracted in Short and Long Contexts
2406.16851
0
0
Abstract
We present LoCoVQA, a dynamic benchmark generator for evaluating long-context extractive reasoning in vision language models (VLMs). LoCoVQA augments test examples for mathematical reasoning, VQA, and character recognition tasks with increasingly long visual contexts composed of both in-distribution and out-of-distribution distractor images. Across these tasks, a diverse set of VLMs rapidly lose performance as the visual context length grows, often exhibiting a striking logarithmic decay trend. This test assesses how well VLMs can ignore irrelevant information when answering queries -- a task that is quite easy for language models (LMs) in the text domain -- demonstrating that current state-of-the-art VLMs lack this essential capability for many long-context applications.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the ability of vision language models (VLMs) to handle long-context visual tasks, where the relevant information is spread across multiple images and captions.
- The authors find that VLMs are easily distracted by irrelevant visual and textual information, struggling to maintain focus on the core task at hand.
- The paper introduces several new benchmarks to evaluate the long-context capabilities of VLMs and provides insights into their limitations.
Plain English Explanation
Vision language models (VLMs) are AI systems that can understand and process both images and text. These models have shown impressive performance on a variety of tasks, such as image captioning and visual question answering. However, the authors of this paper wanted to explore how well these models handle tasks where the relevant information is spread across multiple images and captions, rather than being contained in a single image-caption pair.
To do this, the researchers developed new benchmarks that challenge VLMs to find specific target objects or concepts in a "haystack" of irrelevant visual and textual information. For example, the model might be shown a series of images and captions, and asked to identify a particular item, like a "red umbrella," that is only mentioned briefly in one of the captions.
The authors found that VLMs struggled with these long-context tasks, often getting distracted by the irrelevant information and failing to identify the target. This suggests that these models have difficulty maintaining focus and extracting the truly relevant details when confronted with a complex, multi-part scenario.
The insights from this research could help guide the development of more robust and capable VLMs, able to excel at tasks that require drawing connections across diverse sources of information. By better understanding the limitations of current models, researchers can work to create the next generation of vision-language AI that is less easily distracted and better able to find the "needles in the haystack."
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces several new benchmarks to evaluate the long-context capabilities of vision language models (VLMs). These benchmarks [^1] challenge VLMs to identify target objects or concepts that are spread across multiple images and captions, rather than being contained within a single image-caption pair.
For example, one benchmark presents a sequence of images and captions, and asks the model to identify a specific item (e.g. a "red umbrella") that is only briefly mentioned in one of the captions. Another benchmark involves detecting situations or events that require integrating information from multiple visual and textual sources.
Through experiments on these new benchmarks, the authors find that state-of-the-art VLMs struggle to maintain focus and extract the relevant details when faced with long-context tasks. The models are easily distracted by irrelevant visual and textual information, often failing to identify the target objects or situations.
The paper provides several key insights into the limitations of current VLMs:
- Lack of Contextual Reasoning: VLMs have difficulty connecting disparate pieces of information spread across multiple inputs to solve long-context tasks.
- Sensitivity to Distractors: VLMs are overly sensitive to irrelevant visual and textual "distractors," failing to filter out noise and focus on the salient details.
- Brittleness in Complex Scenarios: VLMs excel at single-shot image-caption tasks but struggle when required to reason about more complex, multi-part scenarios.
These findings suggest that significant progress is still needed to develop VLMs capable of robust, long-range multimodal reasoning. The new benchmarks introduced in this paper provide a valuable toolkit for probing the capabilities and limitations of these models.
[^1]: See also related work on long-context transfer, multimodal needle-in-haystack benchmarks, probing conceptual understanding, detecting multimodal situations with insufficient context, and hijacking context in large multi-modal models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful and well-designed set of experiments to probe the long-context capabilities of VLMs. The new benchmarks introduced are a valuable contribution, as they allow for a more comprehensive evaluation of these models beyond the single-shot image-caption tasks they were originally designed for.
One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on a limited set of VLM architectures, such as CLIP and ALBEF. While these are prominent models, there may be other VLM variants or approaches that could perform better on the long-context tasks. Expanding the analysis to a wider range of VLM architectures could provide a more complete picture of the field's current capabilities and limitations.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying reasons for the VLMs' poor performance on the long-context tasks. While the authors provide some high-level insights, further investigation into the specific modeling and architectural choices that contribute to the observed limitations could be valuable. This could help guide the development of more robust and capable VLMs in the future.
Overall, this research is an important step in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of VLMs, particularly as these models are increasingly deployed in real-world applications that may require long-range multimodal reasoning. By highlighting these limitations, the authors encourage the research community to develop more sophisticated approaches to vision-language integration and contextual understanding.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive study of the long-context capabilities of vision language models (VLMs), revealing that these state-of-the-art AI systems struggle to maintain focus and extract relevant information when faced with complex, multi-part scenarios.
Through the introduction of new benchmarking tasks, the authors demonstrate that VLMs are easily distracted by irrelevant visual and textual "distractors," often failing to identify target objects or situations that are spread across multiple inputs. This suggests that current VLMs have significant limitations in their ability to reason about long-range, multimodal contexts.
The insights from this research provide a valuable roadmap for the continued development of more robust and capable VLMs. By understanding the specific weaknesses of these models, researchers can work to create the next generation of vision-language AI that is less easily distracted and better able to find the "needles in the haystack" of complex, real-world scenarios.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Long Context Transfer from Language to Vision
Peiyuan Zhang, Kaichen Zhang, Bo Li, Guangtao Zeng, Jingkang Yang, Yuanhan Zhang, Ziyue Wang, Haoran Tan, Chunyuan Li, Ziwei Liu
0
0
Video sequences offer valuable temporal information, but existing large multimodal models (LMMs) fall short in understanding extremely long videos. Many works address this by reducing the number of visual tokens using visual resamplers. Alternatively, in this paper, we approach this problem from the perspective of the language model. By simply extrapolating the context length of the language backbone, we enable LMMs to comprehend orders of magnitude more visual tokens without any video training. We call this phenomenon long context transfer and carefully ablate its properties. To effectively measure LMMs' ability to generalize to long contexts in the vision modality, we develop V-NIAH (Visual Needle-In-A-Haystack), a purely synthetic long vision benchmark inspired by the language model's NIAH test. Our proposed Long Video Assistant (LongVA) can process 2000 frames or over 200K visual tokens without additional complexities. With its extended context length, LongVA achieves state-of-the-art performance on Video-MME among 7B-scale models by densely sampling more input frames. Our work is open-sourced at https://github.com/EvolvingLMMs-Lab/LongVA.
7/2/2024
Multimodal Needle in a Haystack: Benchmarking Long-Context Capability of Multimodal Large Language Models
Hengyi Wang, Haizhou Shi, Shiwei Tan, Weiyi Qin, Wenyuan Wang, Tunyu Zhang, Akshay Nambi, Tanuja Ganu, Hao Wang
0
0
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown significant promise in various applications, leading to broad interest from researchers and practitioners alike. However, a comprehensive evaluation of their long-context capabilities remains underexplored. To address these gaps, we introduce the MultiModal Needle-in-a-haystack (MMNeedle) benchmark, specifically designed to assess the long-context capabilities of MLLMs. Besides multi-image input, we employ image stitching to further increase the input context length, and develop a protocol to automatically generate labels for sub-image level retrieval. Essentially, MMNeedle evaluates MLLMs by stress-testing their capability to locate a target sub-image (needle) within a set of images (haystack) based on textual instructions and descriptions of image contents. This setup necessitates an advanced understanding of extensive visual contexts and effective information retrieval within long-context image inputs. With this benchmark, we evaluate state-of-the-art MLLMs, encompassing both API-based and open-source models. The findings reveal that GPT-4o consistently surpasses other models in long-context scenarios, but suffers from hallucination problems in negative samples, i.e., when needles are not in the haystacks. Our comprehensive long-context evaluation of MLLMs also sheds lights on the considerable performance gap between API-based and open-source models. All the code, data, and instructions required to reproduce the main results are available at https://github.com/Wang-ML-Lab/multimodal-needle-in-a-haystack.
6/18/2024
🤔
Probing Conceptual Understanding of Large Visual-Language Models
Madeline Schiappa, Raiyaan Abdullah, Shehreen Azad, Jared Claypoole, Michael Cogswell, Ajay Divakaran, Yogesh Rawat
0
0
In recent years large visual-language (V+L) models have achieved great success in various downstream tasks. However, it is not well studied whether these models have a conceptual grasp of the visual content. In this work we focus on conceptual understanding of these large V+L models. To facilitate this study, we propose novel benchmarking datasets for probing three different aspects of content understanding, 1) textit{relations}, 2) textit{composition}, and 3) textit{context}. Our probes are grounded in cognitive science and help determine if a V+L model can, for example, determine if snow garnished with a man is implausible, or if it can identify beach furniture by knowing it is located on a beach. We experimented with many recent state-of-the-art V+L models and observe that these models mostly textit{fail to demonstrate} a conceptual understanding. This study reveals several interesting insights such as that textit{cross-attention} helps learning conceptual understanding, and that CNNs are better with textit{texture and patterns}, while Transformers are better at textit{color and shape}. We further utilize some of these insights and investigate a textit{simple finetuning technique} that rewards the three conceptual understanding measures with promising initial results. The proposed benchmarks will drive the community to delve deeper into conceptual understanding and foster advancements in the capabilities of large V+L models. The code and dataset is available at: url{https://tinyurl.com/vlm-robustness}
4/29/2024
💬
Detecting Multimodal Situations with Insufficient Context and Abstaining from Baseless Predictions
Junzhang Liu, Zhecan Wang, Hammad Ayyubi, Haoxuan You, Chris Thomas, Rui Sun, Shih-Fu Chang, Kai-Wei Chang
0
0
Despite the widespread adoption of Vision-Language Understanding (VLU) benchmarks such as VQA v2, OKVQA, A-OKVQA, GQA, VCR, SWAG, and VisualCOMET, our analysis reveals a pervasive issue affecting their integrity: these benchmarks contain samples where answers rely on assumptions unsupported by the provided context. Training models on such data foster biased learning and hallucinations as models tend to make similar unwarranted assumptions. To address this issue, we collect contextual data for each sample whenever available and train a context selection module to facilitate evidence-based model predictions. Strong improvements across multiple benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Further, we develop a general-purpose Context-AwaRe Abstention (CARA) detector to identify samples lacking sufficient context and enhance model accuracy by abstaining from responding if the required context is absent. CARA exhibits generalization to new benchmarks it wasn't trained on, underscoring its utility for future VLU benchmarks in detecting or cleaning samples with inadequate context. Finally, we curate a Context Ambiguity and Sufficiency Evaluation (CASE) set to benchmark the performance of insufficient context detectors. Overall, our work represents a significant advancement in ensuring that vision-language models generate trustworthy and evidence-based outputs in complex real-world scenarios.
5/28/2024