Majority consensus thresholds in competitive Lotka--Volterra populations
2405.03568
0
0
🌐
Abstract
One of the key challenges in synthetic biology is devising robust signaling primitives for engineered microbial consortia. In such systems, a fundamental signal amplification problem is the majority consensus problem: given a system with two input species with initial difference of $Delta$ in population sizes, what is the probability that the system reaches a state in which only the initial majority species is present? In this work, we consider a discrete and stochastic version of competitive Lotka--Volterra dynamics, a standard model of microbial community dynamics. We identify new threshold properties for majority consensus under different types of interference competition:
- We show that under so-called self-destructive interference competition between the two input species, majority consensus can be reached with high probability if the initial difference satisfies $Delta in Omega(log^2 n)$, where $n$ is the initial population size. This gives an exponential improvement compared to the previously known bound of $Omega(sqrt{n log n})$ by Cho et al. [Distributed Computing, 2021] given for a special case of the competitive Lotka--Volterra model. In contrast, we show that an initial gap of $Delta in Omega(sqrt{log n})$ is necessary.
- On the other hand, we prove that under non-self-destructive interference competition, an initial gap of $Omega(sqrt{n})$ is necessary to succeed with high probability and that a $Omega(sqrt{n log n})$ gap is sufficient. This shows a strong qualitative gap between the performance of self-destructive and non-self-destructive interference competition. Moreover, we show that if in addition the populations exhibit interference competition between the individuals of the same species, then majority consensus cannot always be solved with high probability, no matter what the difference in the initial population counts.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the majority consensus problem in engineered microbial consortia, which is a fundamental challenge in synthetic biology.
- It analyzes a discrete and stochastic version of the competitive Lotka-Volterra model, a standard model of microbial community dynamics.
- The paper identifies new threshold properties for majority consensus under different types of interference competition between the input species.
Plain English Explanation
In the field of synthetic biology, a key challenge is creating robust communication systems for engineered microbial communities. One fundamental issue is the majority consensus problem: if you have two microbial species with an initial population difference of Δ, what is the likelihood that the system will eventually be dominated by just the initially larger species?
This paper looks at a mathematical model called the competitive Lotka-Volterra dynamics, which is commonly used to study how microbial communities interact. The researchers identified some interesting results:
- Self-destructive interference: If the two microbial species engage in a type of competition called "self-destructive interference", then the system can reach a majority consensus with high probability if the initial population difference Δ is in the order of log^2(n), where n is the total initial population size. This is a significant improvement over the previous best-known bound of sqrt(n log n).
- Non-self-destructive interference: On the other hand, if the competition is "non-self-destructive", then the initial population difference needs to be in the order of sqrt(n) to succeed with high probability, and sqrt(n log n) is sufficient.
- Intraspecies interference: If the microbial populations also compete with their own species members, then majority consensus may not be achievable no matter the initial population difference.
In summary, the type of competition between the microbial species can have a large impact on the likelihood of reaching a majority consensus, with self-destructive interference leading to much better performance than non-self-destructive interference. This provides valuable insights for designing robust signaling systems in synthetic biology.
Technical Explanation
The paper analyzes a discrete and stochastic version of the competitive Lotka-Volterra dynamics, a standard model of microbial community interactions. In this model, there are two input species with an initial population difference of Δ.
The researchers identify new threshold properties for majority consensus under different types of interference competition:
-
Self-destructive interference: In this case, the researchers show that majority consensus can be reached with high probability if the initial population difference Δ is in the order of log^2(n), where n is the total initial population size. This improves exponentially over the previously known bound of sqrt(n log n) from Cho et al. 2021.
-
Non-self-destructive interference: For non-self-destructive interference, the researchers prove that an initial gap of Ω(sqrt(n)) is necessary to succeed with high probability, and Ω(sqrt(n log n)) is sufficient.
This demonstrates a strong qualitative gap between the performance of self-destructive and non-self-destructive interference competition.
Furthermore, the researchers show that if the populations also exhibit interference competition between individuals of the same species, then majority consensus cannot always be solved with high probability, regardless of the initial population difference.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the majority consensus problem in engineered microbial consortia, which is a crucial challenge in synthetic biology. The analysis of the competitive Lotka-Volterra model under different types of interference competition offers a nuanced understanding of the factors that can influence the likelihood of reaching a stable majority state.
One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses on a simplified, theoretical model of microbial interactions. While this allows for rigorous mathematical analysis, the real-world dynamics of engineered microbial consortia may be more complex and involve additional factors not captured by the model.
Additionally, the paper does not explore potential strategies or design principles for engineering microbial systems that can reliably achieve majority consensus. Further research may be needed to translate the theoretical insights into practical guidelines for synthetic biology applications.
It would also be interesting to see how the conclusions of this paper relate to existing research on information spread in social networks or opinion dynamics in asynchronous settings. Exploring these connections could lead to a more comprehensive understanding of consensus formation in complex, decentralized systems.
Conclusion
This paper makes important contributions to the field of synthetic biology by characterizing the majority consensus problem in engineered microbial consortia. The researchers' analysis of the competitive Lotka-Volterra model reveals key differences in the performance of self-destructive and non-self-destructive interference competition, offering valuable insights for the design of robust signaling primitives.
The findings suggest that the type of competition between microbial species can have a significant impact on the likelihood of reaching a stable majority state. This knowledge can inform the development of more reliable and predictable communication systems in synthetic biology, which is crucial for advancing applications in areas like biotechnology, environmental engineering, and medicine.
Overall, this work highlights the importance of rigorous theoretical analysis in addressing fundamental challenges in synthetic biology, and it provides a solid foundation for future research on engineered microbial consortia.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤯
Full Characterization of Adaptively Strong Majority Voting in Crowdsourcing
Margarita Boyarskaya, Panos Ipeirotis
0
0
In crowdsourcing, quality control is commonly achieved by having workers examine items and vote on their correctness. To minimize the impact of unreliable worker responses, a $delta$-margin voting process is utilized, where additional votes are solicited until a predetermined threshold $delta$ for agreement between workers is exceeded. The process is widely adopted but only as a heuristic. Our research presents a modeling approach using absorbing Markov chains to analyze the characteristics of this voting process that matter in crowdsourced processes. We provide closed-form equations for the quality of resulting consensus vote, the expected number of votes required for consensus, the variance of vote requirements, and other distribution moments. Our findings demonstrate how the threshold $delta$ can be adjusted to achieve quality equivalence across voting processes that employ workers with varying accuracy levels. We also provide efficiency-equalizing payment rates for voting processes with different expected response accuracy levels. Additionally, our model considers items with varying degrees of difficulty and uncertainty about the difficulty of each example. Our simulations, using real-world crowdsourced vote data, validate the effectiveness of our theoretical model in characterizing the consensus aggregation process. The results of our study can be effectively employed in practical crowdsourcing applications.
4/29/2024
🚀
Already Moderate Population Sizes Provably Yield Strong Robustness to Noise
Denis Antipov, Benjamin Doerr, Alexandra Ivanova
0
0
Experience shows that typical evolutionary algorithms can cope well with stochastic disturbances such as noisy function evaluations. In this first mathematical runtime analysis of the $(1+lambda)$ and $(1,lambda)$ evolutionary algorithms in the presence of prior bit-wise noise, we show that both algorithms can tolerate constant noise probabilities without increasing the asymptotic runtime on the OneMax benchmark. For this, a population size $lambda$ suffices that is at least logarithmic in the problem size $n$. The only previous result in this direction regarded the less realistic one-bit noise model, required a population size super-linear in the problem size, and proved a runtime guarantee roughly cubic in the noiseless runtime for the OneMax benchmark. Our significantly stronger results are based on the novel proof argument that the noiseless offspring can be seen as a biased uniform crossover between the parent and the noisy offspring. We are optimistic that the technical lemmas resulting from this insight will find applications also in future mathematical runtime analyses of evolutionary algorithms.
5/14/2024
🧪
On the Limits of Information Spread by Memory-less Agents
Niccol`o D'Archivio (INRIA), Robin Vacus (Bocconi University)
0
0
We address the self-stabilizing bit-dissemination problem, designed to capture the challenges of spreading information and reaching consensus among entities with minimal cognitive and communication capacities. Specifically, a group of $n$ agents is required to adopt the correct opinion, initially held by a single informed individual, choosing from two possible opinions. In order to make decisions, agents are restricted to observing the opinions of a few randomly sampled agents, and lack the ability to communicate further and to identify the informed individual. Additionally, agents cannot retain any information from one round to the next. According to a recent publication in SODA (2024), a logarithmic convergence time without memory is achievable in the parallel setting (where agents are updated simultaneously), as long as the number of samples is at least $Omega(sqrt{n log n})$. However, determining the minimal sample size for an efficient protocol to exist remains a challenging open question. As a preliminary step towards an answer, we establish the first lower bound for this problem in the parallel setting. Specifically, we demonstrate that it is impossible for any memory-less protocol with constant sample size, to converge with high probability in less than an almost-linear number of rounds. This lower bound holds even when agents are aware of both the exact value of $n$ and their own opinion, and encompasses various simple existing dynamics designed to achieve consensus. Beyond the bit-dissemination problem, our result sheds light on the convergence time of the minority dynamics, the counterpart of the well-known majority rule, whose chaotic behavior is yet to be fully understood despite the apparent simplicity of the algorithm.
5/6/2024
🔗
Undecided State Dynamics with Stubborn Agents
Petra Berenbrink, Felix Biermeier, Christopher Hahn
0
0
In the classical Approximate Majority problem with two opinions there are agents with Opinion 1 and with Opinion 2. The goal is to reach consensus and to agree on the majority opinion if the bias is sufficiently large. It is well known that the problem can be solved efficiently using the Undecided State Dynamics (USD) where an agent interacting with an agent of the opposite opinion becomes undecided. In this paper, we consider a variant of the USD with a preferred Opinion 1. That is, agents with Opinion 1 behave stubbornly -- they preserve their opinion with probability $p$ whenever they interact with an agent having Opinion 2. Our main result shows a phase transition around the stubbornness parameter $p approx 1-x_1/x_2$. If $x_1 = Theta(n)$ and $p geq 1-x_1/x_2 + o(1)$, then all agents agree on Opinion 1 after $O(ncdot log n)$ interactions. On the other hand, for $p leq 1-x_1/x_2 - o(1)$, all agents agree on Opinion 2, again after $O(ncdot log n)$ interactions. Finally, if $p approx 1-x_1/x_2$, then all agents do agree on one opinion after $O(ncdot log^2 n)$ interactions, but either of the two opinions can survive. All our results hold with high probability.
6/13/2024