Undecided State Dynamics with Stubborn Agents
2406.07335
0
0
๐
Abstract
In the classical Approximate Majority problem with two opinions there are agents with Opinion 1 and with Opinion 2. The goal is to reach consensus and to agree on the majority opinion if the bias is sufficiently large. It is well known that the problem can be solved efficiently using the Undecided State Dynamics (USD) where an agent interacting with an agent of the opposite opinion becomes undecided. In this paper, we consider a variant of the USD with a preferred Opinion 1. That is, agents with Opinion 1 behave stubbornly -- they preserve their opinion with probability $p$ whenever they interact with an agent having Opinion 2. Our main result shows a phase transition around the stubbornness parameter $p approx 1-x_1/x_2$. If $x_1 = Theta(n)$ and $p geq 1-x_1/x_2 + o(1)$, then all agents agree on Opinion 1 after $O(ncdot log n)$ interactions. On the other hand, for $p leq 1-x_1/x_2 - o(1)$, all agents agree on Opinion 2, again after $O(ncdot log n)$ interactions. Finally, if $p approx 1-x_1/x_2$, then all agents do agree on one opinion after $O(ncdot log^2 n)$ interactions, but either of the two opinions can survive. All our results hold with high probability.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the dynamics of opinion formation in a social network where agents aim to maximize their utility by interacting with others.
- The authors investigate the impact of various agent behaviors, network structures, and utility functions on the emergence of consensus and diversity in opinion dynamics.
- The study provides insights into the limits of information spread and the conditions for reaching majority consensus in competitive settings.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how people's opinions change as they interact with others in a social network. It looks at what happens when people try to maximize their own satisfaction or "utility" through these interactions.
The researchers explore different scenarios, such as how the structure of the social network and the way people try to maximize their utility can affect whether everyone ends up with the same opinion or if diverse opinions emerge.
For example, the paper looks at the limits of how information can spread through a network, and the conditions needed for a majority of people to reach a consensus, even in situations where there is competition between different opinions.
The findings provide insights into the complex dynamics of opinion formation and the factors that can lead to agreement or disagreement within a social network.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates opinion dynamics and utility maximizing agents, exploring the impact of various agent behaviors, network structures, and utility functions on the emergence of consensus and diversity.
The authors analyze asynchronous opinion dynamics in social networks, examining the limits of information spread by memory-less agents and the conditions for reaching majority consensus in competitive Lotka-Volterra populations.
The paper also presents a dynamics-based algorithm for level-privacy preservation in the "Push" setting, which aims to address privacy concerns in opinion dynamics.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of opinion dynamics in social networks, considering various factors that can influence the emergence of consensus and diversity. However, the authors acknowledge that their model makes several simplifying assumptions, such as the absence of external influences and the focus on memory-less agents.
While the dynamics-based privacy preservation algorithm is an interesting contribution, the authors note that it may not be suitable for all real-world scenarios, as the level of privacy preservation may not always be sufficient.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential societal implications of the opinion dynamics studied, such as the impact on political discourse, the spread of misinformation, or the challenges of maintaining healthy debate in online communities.
Conclusion
This paper offers valuable insights into the complex dynamics of opinion formation in social networks, highlighting the interplay between agent behaviors, network structures, and utility functions. The findings provide a foundation for further research on opinion dynamics and their implications for understanding and shaping social interactions.
The authors' exploration of privacy preservation in opinion dynamics is a promising step, but additional work may be needed to address the limitations and real-world challenges of ensuring individual privacy while facilitating open and meaningful discourse.
Overall, this research contributes to the ongoing discussion on the social and technological factors that influence the formation, evolution, and spread of opinions in the digital age.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Opinion Dynamics for Utility Maximizing Agents: Exploring the Impact of Resource Penalty
Prashil Wankhede, Nirabhra Mandal, Sonia Mart'inez, Pavankumar Tallapragada
0
0
We propose a continuous-time nonlinear model of opinion dynamics with utility-maximizing agents connected via a social influence network. A distinguishing feature of the proposed model is the inclusion of an opinion-dependent resource-penalty term in the utilities, which limits the agents from holding opinions of large magnitude. The proposed utility functions also account for how the relative resources within the social group affect both an agent's stubbornness and social influence. Each agent myopically seeks to maximize its utility by revising its opinion in the gradient ascent direction of its utility function, thus leading to the proposed opinion dynamics. We show that, for any arbitrary social influence network, opinions are ultimately bounded. For networks with weak antagonistic relations, we show that there exists a globally exponentially stable equilibrium using contraction theory. We establish conditions for the existence of consensus equilibrium and analyze the relative dominance of the agents at consensus. We also conduct a game-theoretic analysis of the underlying opinion formation game, including on Nash equilibria and on prices of anarchy in terms of satisfaction ratios. Additionally, we also investigate the oscillatory behavior of opinions in a two-agent scenario. Finally, simulations illustrate our findings.
4/9/2024
๐ฏ
Asynchronous Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks
Petra Berenbrink, Martin Hoefer, Dominik Kaaser, Pascal Lenzner, Malin Rau, Daniel Schmand
0
0
Opinion spreading in a society decides the fate of elections, the success of products, and the impact of political or social movements. The model by Hegselmann and Krause is a well-known theoretical model to study such opinion formation processes in social networks. In contrast to many other theoretical models, it does not converge towards a situation where all agents agree on the same opinion. Instead, it assumes that people find an opinion reasonable if and only if it is close to their own. The system converges towards a stable situation where agents sharing the same opinion form a cluster, and agents in different clusters do not mbox{influence each other.} We focus on the social variant of the Hegselmann-Krause model where agents are connected by a social network and their opinions evolve in an iterative process. When activated, an agent adopts the average of the opinions of its neighbors having a similar opinion. By this, the set of influencing neighbors of an agent may change over time. To the best of our knowledge, social Hegselmann-Krause systems with asynchronous opinion updates have only been studied with the complete graph as social network. We show that such opinion dynamics with random agent activation are guaranteed to converge for any social network. We provide an upper bound of $mathcal{O}(n|E|^2 (varepsilon/delta)^2)$ on the expected number of opinion updates until convergence, where $|E|$ is the number of edges of the social network. For the complete social network we show a bound of $mathcal{O}(n^3(n^2 + (varepsilon/delta)^2))$ that represents a major improvement over the previously best upper bound of $mathcal{O}(n^9 (varepsilon/delta)^2)$. Our bounds are complemented by simulations that indicate asymptotically matching lower bounds.
4/16/2024
๐ฌ
On the Principles behind Opinion Dynamics in Multi-Agent Systems of Large Language Models
Pedro Cisneros-Velarde
0
0
We study the evolution of opinions inside a population of interacting large language models (LLMs). Every LLM needs to decide how much funding to allocate to an item with three initial possibilities: full, partial, or no funding. We identify biases that drive the exchange of opinions based on the LLM's tendency to (i) find consensus with the other LLM's opinion, (ii) display caution when specifying funding, and (iii) consider ethical concerns in its opinion. We find these biases are affected by the perceived absence of compelling reasons for opinion change, the perceived willingness to engage in discussion, and the distribution of allocation values. Moreover, tensions among biases can lead to the survival of funding for items with negative connotations. We also find that the final distribution of full, partial, and no funding opinions is more diverse when an LLM freely forms its opinion after an interaction than when its opinion is a multiple-choice selection among the three allocation options. In the latter case, consensus or polarization is generally attained. When agents are aware of past opinions, they seek to maintain consistency with them, and more diverse updating rules emerge. Our study is performed using a Llama 3 LLM.
6/26/2024
๐งช
On the Limits of Information Spread by Memory-less Agents
Niccol`o D'Archivio (INRIA), Robin Vacus (Bocconi University)
0
0
We address the self-stabilizing bit-dissemination problem, designed to capture the challenges of spreading information and reaching consensus among entities with minimal cognitive and communication capacities. Specifically, a group of $n$ agents is required to adopt the correct opinion, initially held by a single informed individual, choosing from two possible opinions. In order to make decisions, agents are restricted to observing the opinions of a few randomly sampled agents, and lack the ability to communicate further and to identify the informed individual. Additionally, agents cannot retain any information from one round to the next. According to a recent publication in SODA (2024), a logarithmic convergence time without memory is achievable in the parallel setting (where agents are updated simultaneously), as long as the number of samples is at least $Omega(sqrt{n log n})$. However, determining the minimal sample size for an efficient protocol to exist remains a challenging open question. As a preliminary step towards an answer, we establish the first lower bound for this problem in the parallel setting. Specifically, we demonstrate that it is impossible for any memory-less protocol with constant sample size, to converge with high probability in less than an almost-linear number of rounds. This lower bound holds even when agents are aware of both the exact value of $n$ and their own opinion, and encompasses various simple existing dynamics designed to achieve consensus. Beyond the bit-dissemination problem, our result sheds light on the convergence time of the minority dynamics, the counterpart of the well-known majority rule, whose chaotic behavior is yet to be fully understood despite the apparent simplicity of the algorithm.
5/6/2024