MALIBO: Meta-learning for Likelihood-free Bayesian Optimization
2307.03565
0
0
Abstract
Bayesian optimization (BO) is a popular method to optimize costly black-box functions. While traditional BO optimizes each new target task from scratch, meta-learning has emerged as a way to leverage knowledge from related tasks to optimize new tasks faster. However, existing meta-learning BO methods rely on surrogate models that suffer from scalability issues and are sensitive to observations with different scales and noise types across tasks. Moreover, they often overlook the uncertainty associated with task similarity. This leads to unreliable task adaptation when only limited observations are obtained or when the new tasks differ significantly from the related tasks. To address these limitations, we propose a novel meta-learning BO approach that bypasses the surrogate model and directly learns the utility of queries across tasks. Our method explicitly models task uncertainty and includes an auxiliary model to enable robust adaptation to new tasks. Extensive experiments show that our method demonstrates strong anytime performance and outperforms state-of-the-art meta-learning BO methods in various benchmarks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a meta-learning approach called MALIBO (Meta-learning for Likelihood-free Bayesian Optimization) for Bayesian optimization problems where the objective function is expensive to evaluate.
- MALIBO leverages meta-learning to learn a prior distribution over the objective function, which can then be used to guide the Bayesian optimization process and improve sample efficiency.
- The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of MALIBO on a range of benchmark optimization problems, showing that it can outperform standard Bayesian optimization methods.
Plain English Explanation
MALIBO: Meta-learning for Likelihood-free Bayesian Optimization is a new technique for optimizing complex functions that are costly to evaluate. The key idea is to use meta-learning to learn a good starting point or "prior" for the optimization process.
In many real-world optimization problems, the function we want to optimize (e.g., the performance of a machine learning model) is like a black box - we can't easily write down a formula for it. Bayesian optimization is a popular approach for these kinds of problems, but it can be slow because it requires many evaluations of the objective function.
MALIBO aims to speed up Bayesian optimization by using meta-learning to learn a good starting point for the optimization. The idea is to look at how the objective function behaves on similar problems, and use that information to guide the optimization process on the current problem. This allows MALIBO to find the optimum more efficiently than standard Bayesian optimization methods.
The authors demonstrate that MALIBO outperforms other Bayesian optimization techniques on a variety of benchmark problems, making it a promising approach for practical optimization tasks where evaluating the objective function is costly.
Technical Explanation
MALIBO: Meta-learning for Likelihood-free Bayesian Optimization is a meta-learning approach for Bayesian optimization problems where the objective function is expensive to evaluate. The key idea is to learn a prior distribution over the objective function using meta-learning, and then use this prior to guide the Bayesian optimization process.
The authors formulate the Bayesian optimization problem in a meta-learning framework, where the goal is to learn a distribution over objective functions that can be efficiently optimized. They propose a meta-learning algorithm that learns this distribution by observing how the objective function behaves on a set of related optimization problems.
During the optimization process, MALIBO uses the learned prior distribution to guide the Bayesian optimization, reducing the number of expensive function evaluations required to find the optimum. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of MALIBO on a range of benchmark optimization problems, showing that it can outperform standard Bayesian optimization methods like Gaussian process-based approaches and zeroth-order optimization.
Critical Analysis
The authors of the MALIBO paper make a compelling case for their meta-learning approach to Bayesian optimization. By leveraging information from related optimization problems, they are able to learn a useful prior distribution that can significantly improve the sample efficiency of the optimization process.
One potential limitation of the MALIBO approach is the assumption that the objective functions being optimized share some underlying structure that can be effectively captured by the meta-learning process. In cases where the optimization problems are highly diverse or the objective functions have complex, idiosyncratic properties, the learned prior may not provide as much of a benefit.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the computational complexity or training time required for the meta-learning component of MALIBO. Depending on the scale and complexity of the meta-training data, this could be a practical concern for some applications.
Overall, the MALIBO method represents an interesting and promising direction for enhancing Bayesian optimization, particularly in domains where evaluating the objective function is extremely costly. Further research into the robustness and scalability of the approach could help identify its strengths and limitations in a wider range of real-world optimization scenarios.
Conclusion
The MALIBO paper introduces a novel meta-learning approach for Bayesian optimization that can significantly improve the sample efficiency of the optimization process. By learning a prior distribution over the objective function from related optimization problems, MALIBO is able to guide the Bayesian optimization in a more informed manner, leading to faster convergence to the optimal solution.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of MALIBO on a range of benchmark optimization problems, showcasing its potential for practical applications where evaluating the objective function is an expensive operation. While the approach may have some limitations in terms of its applicability to highly diverse optimization problems, the core idea of leveraging meta-learning to enhance Bayesian optimization is a promising direction that could have broad implications for the field of global optimization.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛠️
Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization
Haoxian Chen, Henry Lam
0
0
Bayesian Optimization is a popular approach for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Its key idea is to use a surrogate model to approximate the objective and, importantly, quantify the associated uncertainty that allows a sequential search of query points that balance exploitation-exploration. Gaussian process (GP) has been a primary candidate for the surrogate model, thanks to its Bayesian-principled uncertainty quantification power and modeling flexibility. However, its challenges have also spurred an array of alternatives whose convergence properties could be more opaque. Motivated by these, we study in this paper an axiomatic framework that elicits the minimal requirements to guarantee black-box optimization convergence that could apply beyond GP-based methods. Moreover, we leverage the design freedom in our framework, which we call Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization, to construct empirically superior algorithms. In particular, we show how using simple local regression, and a suitable randomized prior construction to quantify uncertainty, not only guarantees convergence but also consistently outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks in examples ranging from high-dimensional synthetic experiments to realistic hyperparameter tuning and robotic applications.
6/21/2024
🧪
More Flexible PAC-Bayesian Meta-Learning by Learning Learning Algorithms
Hossein Zakerinia, Amin Behjati, Christoph H. Lampert
0
0
We introduce a new framework for studying meta-learning methods using PAC-Bayesian theory. Its main advantage over previous work is that it allows for more flexibility in how the transfer of knowledge between tasks is realized. For previous approaches, this could only happen indirectly, by means of learning prior distributions over models. In contrast, the new generalization bounds that we prove express the process of meta-learning much more directly as learning the learning algorithm that should be used for future tasks. The flexibility of our framework makes it suitable to analyze a wide range of meta-learning mechanisms and even design new mechanisms. Other than our theoretical contributions we also show empirically that our framework improves the prediction quality in practical meta-learning mechanisms.
5/30/2024
Provably Efficient Bayesian Optimization with Unbiased Gaussian Process Hyperparameter Estimation
Huong Ha, Vu Nguyen, Hung Tran-The, Hongyu Zhang, Xiuzhen Zhang, Anton van den Hengel
0
0
Gaussian process (GP) based Bayesian optimization (BO) is a powerful method for optimizing black-box functions efficiently. The practical performance and theoretical guarantees of this approach depend on having the correct GP hyperparameter values, which are usually unknown in advance and need to be estimated from the observed data. However, in practice, these estimations could be incorrect due to biased data sampling strategies used in BO. This can lead to degraded performance and break the sub-linear global convergence guarantee of BO. To address this issue, we propose a new BO method that can sub-linearly converge to the objective function's global optimum even when the true GP hyperparameters are unknown in advance and need to be estimated from the observed data. Our method uses a multi-armed bandit technique (EXP3) to add random data points to the BO process, and employs a novel training loss function for the GP hyperparameter estimation process that ensures consistent estimation. We further provide theoretical analysis of our proposed method. Finally, we demonstrate empirically that our method outperforms existing approaches on various synthetic and real-world problems.
6/7/2024
🛠️
Principled Preferential Bayesian Optimization
Wenjie Xu, Wenbin Wang, Yuning Jiang, Bratislav Svetozarevic, Colin N. Jones
0
0
We study the problem of preferential Bayesian optimization (BO), where we aim to optimize a black-box function with only preference feedback over a pair of candidate solutions. Inspired by the likelihood ratio idea, we construct a confidence set of the black-box function using only the preference feedback. An optimistic algorithm with an efficient computational method is then developed to solve the problem, which enjoys an information-theoretic bound on the total cumulative regret, a first-of-its-kind for preferential BO. This bound further allows us to design a scheme to report an estimated best solution, with a guaranteed convergence rate. Experimental results on sampled instances from Gaussian processes, standard test functions, and a thermal comfort optimization problem all show that our method stably achieves better or competitive performance as compared to the existing state-of-the-art heuristics, which, however, do not have theoretical guarantees on regret bounds or convergence.
5/30/2024