Manydepth2: Motion-Aware Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Estimation in Dynamic Scenes

Overview

• This paper introduces MGDepth, a method for self-supervised monocular depth estimation in dynamic scenes.
• It uses a motion-guided cost volume to leverage both photometric and motion cues, improving depth prediction in challenging scenarios with moving objects.
• The approach is validated on several datasets, showing improved performance compared to prior self-supervised methods.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers developed a new technique called MGDepth to estimate depth from a single camera in scenes with moving objects. Typical depth estimation models struggle in these dynamic environments, but MGDepth overcomes this by using information about the motion of objects in the scene.

The key idea is to build a cost volume - a 3D grid that stores potential depth values and how well they explain the observed image. MGDepth's cost volume incorporates both the standard photometric cues (how the image would look at different depths) as well as motion cues (how the objects are moving). This allows the model to better resolve depth, especially for moving objects.

The researchers tested MGDepth on several benchmark datasets and found it outperformed previous self-supervised depth estimation methods, particularly in scenes with significant motion. This suggests MGDepth could be a valuable tool for applications like autonomous vehicles or 3D reconstruction that need to work robustly in dynamic environments.

Technical Explanation

The core of the MGDepth approach is the motion-guided cost volume. Typical self-supervised depth estimation relies on a photometric loss - comparing the current image to a synthesized image based on the predicted depth and camera motion. MGDepth augments this with an additional motion-based loss term.

Specifically, MGDepth first computes optical flow between the current and previous frames. It then uses this flow to warp the previous frame and compute a photometric error between the warped previous frame and the current frame. This motion-based photometric error is combined with the standard photometric error to form the final cost volume.

By incorporating both photometric and motion cues, the cost volume can better resolve depth, especially for dynamic regions of the scene. The paper shows MGDepth outperforming prior self-supervised methods like ManyDepth and ProDepth on benchmark datasets with significant motion.

Critical Analysis

The authors note that while MGDepth improves on prior work, there are still some limitations. Dynamic objects with complex motions or large displacements between frames can still be challenging. The authors suggest future work could explore explicit motion segmentation to handle these cases.

Additionally, the approach currently relies on optical flow, which can be noisy or inaccurate in some scenarios. Exploring alternative motion representations or joint estimation of depth and motion may further improve performance.

One broader concern is the inherent difficulty of self-supervised monocular depth estimation, where a single 2D image must be used to infer a 3D scene. This is an ill-posed problem with many potential solutions. While MGDepth demonstrates improvements, depth estimation in general remains a challenging computer vision task.

Conclusion

The MGDepth method introduces an effective way to leverage motion cues for self-supervised monocular depth estimation in dynamic scenes. By building a motion-guided cost volume, it can better resolve depth, especially for moving objects. The results show improved performance over prior self-supervised techniques, suggesting MGDepth could be a valuable tool for applications requiring robust depth perception in challenging real-world environments.