A Mathematical Model of the Hidden Feedback Loop Effect in Machine Learning Systems
2405.02726
0
0
Abstract
Widespread deployment of societal-scale machine learning systems necessitates a thorough understanding of the resulting long-term effects these systems have on their environment, including loss of trustworthiness, bias amplification, and violation of AI safety requirements. We introduce a repeated learning process to jointly describe several phenomena attributed to unintended hidden feedback loops, such as error amplification, induced concept drift, echo chambers and others. The process comprises the entire cycle of obtaining the data, training the predictive model, and delivering predictions to end-users within a single mathematical model. A distinctive feature of such repeated learning setting is that the state of the environment becomes causally dependent on the learner itself over time, thus violating the usual assumptions about the data distribution. We present a novel dynamical systems model of the repeated learning process and prove the limiting set of probability distributions for positive and negative feedback loop modes of the system operation. We conduct a series of computational experiments using an exemplary supervised learning problem on two synthetic data sets. The results of the experiments correspond to the theoretical predictions derived from the dynamical model. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach for studying the repeated learning processes in machine learning systems and open a range of opportunities for further research in the area.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a mathematical model to study the "hidden feedback loop effect" in machine learning systems.
- This effect can lead to unexpected and potentially problematic behaviors as machine learning models are deployed in real-world applications.
- The model aims to provide a framework for analyzing and understanding this phenomenon, which has important implications for the development of safe and reliable AI systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a problem that can arise when machine learning models are used in the real world. Imagine you have a model that's been trained to do a certain task, like recognize objects in images. When you deploy this model in the real world, it might start behaving in unexpected ways that you didn't see during training.
The reason for this is what the authors call the "hidden feedback loop effect." Essentially, the model's predictions can influence the data it sees in the future, creating a feedback loop that the model wasn't trained to handle. This can lead to the model getting stuck in undesirable states or exhibiting other problematic behaviors.
To study this phenomenon, the authors develop a mathematical model that captures the key dynamics of this hidden feedback loop. By analyzing this model, they hope to gain insights that can help developers build more robust and reliable machine learning systems that can handle these kinds of feedback effects.
Some of the key ideas the paper explores include link to "Heat Death of Generative Models in Closed-Loop Learning", link to "Self-Correcting and Self-Consuming Loops in Generative Models", and link to "Learning to Boost Performance of Stable Nonlinear Systems". By understanding these concepts, the authors hope to provide guidance for building link to "Providing Safety Assurances for Systems with Unknown Dynamics" and link to "Are Good Explainers Secretly 'Human in the Loop' Active?" machine learning systems that are more robust and reliable.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a mathematical model to study the "hidden feedback loop effect" in machine learning systems. The authors start by observing that when machine learning models are deployed in real-world applications, they can exhibit unexpected and problematic behaviors that were not observed during the training phase.
The key idea behind the hidden feedback loop effect is that the model's predictions can influence the data it sees in the future, creating a feedback loop that the model was not trained to handle. This can lead to the model getting stuck in undesirable states or exhibiting other issues.
To study this phenomenon, the authors develop a mathematical model that captures the key dynamics of the hidden feedback loop. The model consists of two main components: a machine learning model that makes predictions based on its inputs, and an environment that generates the inputs to the model based on its previous predictions.
The authors then analyze this model using techniques from dynamical systems theory and control theory. They explore various scenarios, such as the link to "Heat Death of Generative Models in Closed-Loop Learning" and link to "Self-Correcting and Self-Consuming Loops in Generative Models", to understand the conditions under which the hidden feedback loop can lead to problematic behaviors.
The insights from this analysis provide guidance for building more link to "Learning to Boost Performance of Stable Nonlinear Systems" robust and link to "Providing Safety Assurances for Systems with Unknown Dynamics" reliable machine learning systems, as well as link to "Are Good Explainers Secretly 'Human in the Loop' Active?" understanding the potential pitfalls of using machine learning models in real-world applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable framework for analyzing the hidden feedback loop effect in machine learning systems, which is an important and underexplored problem. The mathematical model developed in the paper captures the key dynamics of this phenomenon and allows the authors to study it in a systematic way.
One potential limitation of the paper is that the model may oversimplify the real-world complexities of machine learning systems and their interactions with the environment. In practice, there may be many other factors and feedback mechanisms at play that are not captured by the model. Additionally, the authors do not provide empirical validation of the model's predictions, which would be an important next step to assess its practical utility.
Another area for further research could be exploring the implications of the hidden feedback loop effect for different types of machine learning models and applications. The paper primarily focuses on a generic model, but the dynamics may vary significantly depending on the specific architecture, training, and deployment scenarios.
Overall, the paper makes an important contribution by highlighting the hidden feedback loop effect and providing a framework for studying it. However, more work is needed to fully understand the real-world implications and develop practical solutions for building more robust and reliable machine learning systems.
Conclusion
The paper presents a mathematical model to study the "hidden feedback loop effect" in machine learning systems, a phenomenon where a model's predictions can influence the data it sees in the future, leading to unexpected and problematic behaviors.
By analyzing this model, the authors gain insights into the conditions under which the hidden feedback loop can arise and the potential issues it can cause. These insights have important implications for the development of safe and reliable AI systems, as they can help guide the design of machine learning models that are more robust to these kinds of feedback effects.
The paper's contributions include a deeper understanding of concepts like the link to "Heat Death of Generative Models in Closed-Loop Learning", link to "Self-Correcting and Self-Consuming Loops in Generative Models", and link to "Learning to Boost Performance of Stable Nonlinear Systems", as well as guidance for link to "Providing Safety Assurances for Systems with Unknown Dynamics" and link to "Are Good Explainers Secretly 'Human in the Loop' Active?" in the development of more robust and reliable machine learning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Feedback Loops With Language Models Drive In-Context Reward Hacking
Alexander Pan, Erik Jones, Meena Jagadeesan, Jacob Steinhardt
0
0
Language models influence the external world: they query APIs that read and write to web pages, generate content that shapes human behavior, and run system commands as autonomous agents. These interactions form feedback loops: LLM outputs affect the world, which in turn affect subsequent LLM outputs. In this work, we show that feedback loops can cause in-context reward hacking (ICRH), where the LLM at test-time optimizes a (potentially implicit) objective but creates negative side effects in the process. For example, consider an LLM agent deployed to increase Twitter engagement; the LLM may retrieve its previous tweets into the context window and make them more controversial, increasing engagement but also toxicity. We identify and study two processes that lead to ICRH: output-refinement and policy-refinement. For these processes, evaluations on static datasets are insufficient -- they miss the feedback effects and thus cannot capture the most harmful behavior. In response, we provide three recommendations for evaluation to capture more instances of ICRH. As AI development accelerates, the effects of feedback loops will proliferate, increasing the need to understand their role in shaping LLM behavior.
6/10/2024
🧠
Heat Death of Generative Models in Closed-Loop Learning
Matteo Marchi, Stefano Soatto, Pratik Chaudhari, Paulo Tabuada
0
0
Improvement and adoption of generative machine learning models is rapidly accelerating, as exemplified by the popularity of LLMs (Large Language Models) for text, and diffusion models for image generation.As generative models become widespread, data they generate is incorporated into shared content through the public web. This opens the question of what happens when data generated by a model is fed back to the model in subsequent training campaigns. This is a question about the stability of the training process, whether the distribution of publicly accessible content, which we refer to as knowledge, remains stable or collapses. Small scale empirical experiments reported in the literature show that this closed-loop training process is prone to degenerating. Models may start producing gibberish data, or sample from only a small subset of the desired data distribution (a phenomenon referred to as mode collapse). So far there has been only limited theoretical understanding of this process, in part due to the complexity of the deep networks underlying these generative models. The aim of this paper is to provide insights into this process (that we refer to as generative closed-loop learning) by studying the learning dynamics of generative models that are fed back their own produced content in addition to their original training dataset. The sampling of many of these models can be controlled via a temperature parameter. Using dynamical systems tools, we show that, unless a sufficient amount of external data is introduced at each iteration, any non-trivial temperature leads the model to asymptotically degenerate. In fact, either the generative distribution collapses to a small set of outputs, or becomes uniform over a large set of outputs.
4/8/2024
Loop Polarity Analysis to Avoid Underspecification in Deep Learning
Donald Martin, Jr., David Kinney
0
0
Deep learning is a powerful set of techniques for detecting complex patterns in data. However, when the causal structure of that process is underspecified, deep learning models can be brittle, lacking robustness to shifts in the distribution of the data-generating process. In this paper, we turn to loop polarity analysis as a tool for specifying the causal structure of a data-generating process, in order to encode a more robust understanding of the relationship between system structure and system behavior within the deep learning pipeline. We use simulated epidemic data based on an SIR model to demonstrate how measuring the polarity of the different feedback loops that compose a system can lead to more robust inferences on the part of neural networks, improving the out-of-distribution performance of a deep learning model and infusing a system-dynamics-inspired approach into the machine learning development pipeline.
5/31/2024
📈
Self-Correcting Self-Consuming Loops for Generative Model Training
Nate Gillman, Michael Freeman, Daksh Aggarwal, Chia-Hong Hsu, Calvin Luo, Yonglong Tian, Chen Sun
0
0
As synthetic data becomes higher quality and proliferates on the internet, machine learning models are increasingly trained on a mix of human- and machine-generated data. Despite the successful stories of using synthetic data for representation learning, using synthetic data for generative model training creates self-consuming loops which may lead to training instability or even collapse, unless certain conditions are met. Our paper aims to stabilize self-consuming generative model training. Our theoretical results demonstrate that by introducing an idealized correction function, which maps a data point to be more likely under the true data distribution, self-consuming loops can be made exponentially more stable. We then propose self-correction functions, which rely on expert knowledge (e.g. the laws of physics programmed in a simulator), and aim to approximate the idealized corrector automatically and at scale. We empirically validate the effectiveness of self-correcting self-consuming loops on the challenging human motion synthesis task, and observe that it successfully avoids model collapse, even when the ratio of synthetic data to real data is as high as 100%.
6/11/2024