Maximizing utility in multi-agent environments by anticipating the behavior of other learners
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates how autonomous agents can maximize their utility in multi-agent environments by anticipating the behavior of other learning agents.
- The authors propose a novel approach called "Countering Opponents through Anticipation of Learned Strategies" (COALS), which allows agents to model and exploit the behaviors of other learning agents.
- The paper presents experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of COALS in outperforming standard learning algorithms in various multi-agent environments.
Plain English Explanation
In many real-world scenarios, such as trading or contract design, autonomous agents need to interact with and respond to the actions of other agents. The key challenge is that these other agents may also be learning and adapting their behavior over time, making the environment highly dynamic and uncertain.
The COALS approach proposed in this paper aims to address this challenge. The core idea is for each agent to build a model of the other agents' learning processes, and then use this model to anticipate their future behavior and adjust its own actions accordingly. By staying one step ahead of the other agents, the agent can maximize its own utility or rewards.
For example, imagine a scenario where multiple trading agents are trying to buy and sell goods in a market. Instead of just reacting to the current prices and actions of the other agents, the COALS approach would allow each agent to predict how the other agents might adjust their strategies over time, and then modify its own bidding and selling behavior to take advantage of this.
The paper demonstrates through experiments that agents using the COALS approach can outperform standard learning algorithms in a variety of multi-agent environments, highlighting the value of this anticipatory approach.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation of the COALS approach is the way it models the learning processes of other agents. Instead of just observing the current actions of the other agents, COALS builds a predictive model of how those agents are likely to update their strategies over time based on the rewards they receive.
This predictive model is then used by the agent to simulate the future behavior of the other agents and determine the best actions to take in response. The authors show that by "anticipating the behavior of other learners," the agent can make more informed decisions and achieve higher overall utility.
The paper presents experiments in several multi-agent environments, including a resource allocation game and a multi-agent reinforcement learning domain. The results demonstrate that COALS outperforms standard learning algorithms like Q-learning and fictitious play, particularly in settings where the other agents are also actively learning and adapting their strategies.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of the COALS approach is the complexity of building accurate predictive models of the other agents' learning processes. In highly dynamic and uncertain environments, it may be challenging to capture all the nuances of how the other agents are updating their strategies. This could lead to errors in the agent's anticipation of the other agents' behavior, potentially reducing the effectiveness of the approach.
Additionally, the paper does not address how COALS would scale to large-scale, real-world multi-agent systems with many participants. The computational overhead of modeling each individual agent's learning process may become prohibitive as the number of agents grows.
Further research could explore ways to make the COALS approach more robust and scalable, such as by incorporating techniques from generalized principal-agent problems or leveraging insights from the online contract design literature.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising approach for enabling autonomous agents to maximize their utility in complex, multi-agent environments. By anticipating the behavior of other learning agents, the COALS algorithm allows agents to make more informed decisions and achieve higher overall rewards.
The insights from this research could have significant implications for a wide range of real-world applications, from trading and contract design to resource allocation and multi-agent reinforcement learning. As AI systems become more ubiquitous in these domains, the ability to anticipate and adapt to the behaviors of other learning agents will be a crucial capability.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Maximizing utility in multi-agent environments by anticipating the behavior of other learners
Angelos Assos, Yuval Dagan, Constantinos Daskalakis
Learning algorithms are often used to make decisions in sequential decision-making environments. In multi-agent settings, the decisions of each agent can affect the utilities/losses of the other agents. Therefore, if an agent is good at anticipating the behavior of the other agents, in particular how they will make decisions in each round as a function of their experience that far, it could try to judiciously make its own decisions over the rounds of the interaction so as to influence the other agents to behave in a way that ultimately benefits its own utility. In this paper, we study repeated two-player games involving two types of agents: a learner, which employs an online learning algorithm to choose its strategy in each round; and an optimizer, which knows the learner's utility function and the learner's online learning algorithm. The optimizer wants to plan ahead to maximize its own utility, while taking into account the learner's behavior. We provide two results: a positive result for repeated zero-sum games and a negative result for repeated general-sum games. Our positive result is an algorithm for the optimizer, which exactly maximizes its utility against a learner that plays the Replicator Dynamics -- the continuous-time analogue of Multiplicative Weights Update (MWU). Additionally, we use this result to provide an algorithm for the optimizer against MWU, i.e.~for the discrete-time setting, which guarantees an average utility for the optimizer that is higher than the value of the one-shot game. Our negative result shows that, unless P=NP, there is no Fully Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme (FPTAS) for maximizing the utility of an optimizer against a learner that best-responds to the history in each round. Yet, this still leaves open the question of whether there exists a polynomial-time algorithm that optimizes the utility up to $o(T)$.
Read more7/9/2024
📉
0
Adaptive maximization of social welfare
Nicolo Cesa-Bianchi, Roberto Colomboni, Maximilian Kasy
We consider the problem of repeatedly choosing policies to maximize social welfare. Welfare is a weighted sum of private utility and public revenue. Earlier outcomes inform later policies. Utility is not observed, but indirectly inferred. Response functions are learned through experimentation. We derive a lower bound on regret, and a matching adversarial upper bound for a variant of the Exp3 algorithm. Cumulative regret grows at a rate of $T^{2/3}$. This implies that (i) welfare maximization is harder than the multi-armed bandit problem (with a rate of $T^{1/2}$ for finite policy sets), and (ii) our algorithm achieves the optimal rate. For the stochastic setting, if social welfare is concave, we can achieve a rate of $T^{1/2}$ (for continuous policy sets), using a dyadic search algorithm. We analyze an extension to nonlinear income taxation, and sketch an extension to commodity taxation. We compare our setting to monopoly pricing (which is easier), and price setting for bilateral trade (which is harder).
Read more7/30/2024
0
Learning in Multi-Objective Public Goods Games with Non-Linear Utilities
Nicole Orzan, Erman Acar, Davide Grossi, Patrick Mannion, Roxana Ru{a}dulescu
Addressing the question of how to achieve optimal decision-making under risk and uncertainty is crucial for enhancing the capabilities of artificial agents that collaborate with or support humans. In this work, we address this question in the context of Public Goods Games. We study learning in a novel multi-objective version of the Public Goods Game where agents have different risk preferences, by means of multi-objective reinforcement learning. We introduce a parametric non-linear utility function to model risk preferences at the level of individual agents, over the collective and individual reward components of the game. We study the interplay between such preference modelling and environmental uncertainty on the incentive alignment level in the game. We demonstrate how different combinations of individual preferences and environmental uncertainties sustain the emergence of cooperative patterns in non-cooperative environments (i.e., where competitive strategies are dominant), while others sustain competitive patterns in cooperative environments (i.e., where cooperative strategies are dominant).
Read more8/2/2024
🤿
0
New Perspectives in Online Contract Design
Shiliang Zuo
This work studies the repeated principal-agent problem from an online learning perspective. The principal's goal is to learn the optimal contract that maximizes her utility through repeated interactions, without prior knowledge of the agent's type (i.e., the agent's cost and production functions). This work contains three technical results. First, learning linear contracts with binary outcomes is equivalent to dynamic pricing with an unknown demand curve. Second, learning an approximately optimal contract with identical agents can be accomplished with a polynomial sample complexity scheme. Third, learning the optimal contract with heterogeneous agents can be reduced to Lipschitz bandits under mild regularity conditions. The technical results demonstrate that the one-dimensional effort model, the default model for principal-agent problems in economics which seems largely ignored in recent works from the computer science community, may possibly be the more suitable choice when studying contract design from a learning perspective.
Read more5/24/2024