Mazed and Confused: A Dataset of Cybersickness, Working Memory, Mental Load, Physical Load, and Attention During a Real Walking Task in VR

Overview

• This paper describes a dataset called "Mazed and Confused" that was collected during a real walking task in virtual reality (VR).
• The dataset includes measures of cybersickness, working memory, mental load, physical load, and attention for participants as they navigated a virtual maze.
• The goal was to better understand how different factors influence user experience and performance in VR walking tasks.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers created a virtual maze and had participants walk through it while wearing a VR headset. They measured several things during this task:

• Cybersickness: How much nausea, dizziness, or disorientation the participants experienced.
• Working memory: How well the participants could remember and manipulate information.
• Mental load: How much mental effort the task required.
• Physical load: How physically demanding the task was.
• Attention: How focused the participants were during the task.

By collecting all of these different measurements, the researchers hoped to better understand the factors that influence a person's experience and performance when using VR for real walking activities, like navigating a virtual environment.

Technical Explanation

The researchers designed an experiment where participants wore a VR headset and walked through a virtual maze. During this task, the researchers collected several types of data:

• Cybersickness: Participants reported their level of nausea, dizziness, and disorientation using a standard questionnaire.
• Working memory: Participants completed a memory task before and after the VR walking activity to measure changes in their working memory performance.
• Mental load: The researchers used a well-established metric called the NASA-TLX to assess how mentally demanding the VR task was for participants.
• Physical load: Participants wore sensors to measure their heart rate and movement, which provided an estimate of the physical effort required for the VR walking task.
• Attention: The researchers monitored participants' eye movements and blink patterns to gauge their level of attention during the VR activity.

By combining all of these different measurements, the researchers aimed to create a comprehensive dataset that could be used to better understand the user experience and performance factors involved in VR walking tasks.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their study:

• The sample size was relatively small, with only 20 participants. This limits the statistical power and generalizability of the findings.
• The virtual maze was relatively simple and may not fully capture the complexity of real-world navigation tasks.
• The researchers did not explore how individual differences (e.g., prior VR experience, motion sickness susceptibility) might influence the measured outcomes.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential biases in the data collection or analysis methods, which could impact the reliability and validity of the results. Further research with larger, more diverse samples and more sophisticated experimental designs would be needed to fully understand the relationship between VR walking, cybersickness, cognitive load, and attention.

Conclusion

The "Mazed and Confused" dataset provides a valuable resource for researchers studying the user experience and performance factors involved in VR walking tasks. By collecting a range of physiological and cognitive measures, the researchers have created a dataset that can be used to better understand the complex interplay between factors like cybersickness, working memory, mental load, physical load, and attention. While the study has some limitations, it represents an important step towards improving the design and implementation of VR-based applications that involve real walking.