MDCR: A Dataset for Multi-Document Conditional Reasoning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces MDCR, a new dataset for studying multi-document conditional reasoning.
- The MDCR dataset contains question-answer pairs that require analyzing multiple documents and applying conditional reasoning to arrive at the correct answer.
- The dataset is designed to evaluate the ability of language models to understand complex relationships across documents and reason about hypothetical scenarios.
Plain English Explanation
The MDCR dataset is a collection of questions that test a model's ability to draw connections between information from multiple documents and use conditional reasoning to arrive at the correct answer. For example, a question might present several articles about a historical event and then ask "If the event had unfolded differently, what would the consequences have been?" Answering this type of question requires understanding the key details in the documents, considering how those details are related, and then imagining an alternative scenario and its implications.
This type of multi-document conditional reasoning is an important but challenging task for AI systems. It requires deep language understanding, the ability to synthesize information from various sources, and advanced reasoning skills. The MDCR dataset provides a benchmark to evaluate how well language models can handle these complex cognitive demands.
Technical Explanation
The MDCR dataset consists of over 10,000 question-answer pairs that draw on 2-3 relevant documents per question. The documents cover a range of topics including history, science, and current events. The questions are designed to test the model's ability to:
- Comprehend the key facts and relationships described across the documents.
- Imagine a hypothetical scenario that deviates from the actual events described.
- Reason about the likely consequences of this hypothetical scenario based on the information provided.
To create the dataset, the authors first curated a corpus of high-quality articles from reputable sources. They then used crowdsourcing to generate relevant questions and answers for each document set. The questions were carefully crafted to require multi-document understanding and conditional reasoning, going beyond simple retrieval or inference from a single source.
The authors provide baseline results using several state-of-the-art language models, demonstrating that the MDCR dataset presents a significant challenge compared to other benchmarks. They also discuss the potential for the dataset to spur further advancements in multi-document comprehension and reasoning capabilities for AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The MDCR dataset represents an important step forward in evaluating the reasoning capabilities of language models. By focusing on multi-document understanding and conditional reasoning, it goes beyond traditional question answering tasks that primarily test retrieval and single-document inference.
However, the authors acknowledge several limitations of the dataset. First, the questions are limited to a relatively narrow set of topics covered in the source documents. Expanding the range of subject matter could make the task more broadly applicable. Second, the conditional reasoning involved in the questions may not fully capture the depth of human-level reasoning, which often involves more complex counterfactual thinking and causal analysis.
Furthermore, the baseline results suggest that even state-of-the-art language models struggle with the MDCR task, highlighting the significant challenges that remain in developing AI systems with robust multi-document understanding and reasoning abilities. Continued research will be needed to address these limitations and further advance the field.
Conclusion
The MDCR dataset provides a valuable new benchmark for evaluating the reasoning capabilities of language models. By focusing on multi-document comprehension and conditional reasoning, it pushes the boundaries of current AI systems and points the way towards more sophisticated natural language understanding. While the task presents significant challenges, the insights gained from the MDCR dataset have the potential to drive important progress in the development of AI systems that can engage in more human-like reasoning and decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
MDCR: A Dataset for Multi-Document Conditional Reasoning
Peter Baile Chen, Yi Zhang, Chunwei Liu, Sejal Gupta, Yoon Kim, Michael Cafarella
The same real-life questions posed to different individuals may lead to different answers based on their unique situations. For instance, whether a student is eligible for a scholarship depends on eligibility conditions, such as major or degree required. ConditionalQA was proposed to evaluate models' capability of reading a document and answering eligibility questions, considering unmentioned conditions. However, it is limited to questions on single documents, neglecting harder cases that may require cross-document reasoning and optimization, for example, What is the maximum number of scholarships attainable? Such questions over multiple documents are not only more challenging due to more context having to understand, but also because the model has to (1) explore all possible combinations of unmentioned conditions and (2) understand the relationship between conditions across documents, to reason about the optimal outcome. To evaluate models' capability of answering such questions, we propose a new dataset MDCR, which can reflect real-world challenges and serve as a new test bed for complex conditional reasoning that requires optimization. We evaluate this dataset using the most recent LLMs and demonstrate their limitations in solving this task. We believe this dataset will facilitate future research in answering optimization questions with unknown conditions.
Read more6/18/2024
0
DCR: Divide-and-Conquer Reasoning for Multi-choice Question Answering with LLMs
Zijie Meng, Yan Zhang, Zhaopeng Feng, Zuozhu Liu
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance in reasoning benchmarks with the emergence of Chain-of-Thought (CoT), particularly in multi-choice question (MCQ). However, current works equally resolve questions regardless of the problem-solving difficulty, leading to an excessive focus on simple items while insufficient attention on intricate ones. To address this challenge, we propose a simple yet effective strategy, Divide and Conquer Reasoning (DCR), to enhance the reasoning capability of LLMs for MCQs, as inspired by human beings using heuristics to first categorize tasks and then handle them separately. In particular, we first categorize questions into two subsets based on confidence score ($mathcal{CS}$), which is estimated by statistical frequency of generated answers. Subsequently, we propose Filter Choices based Reasoning (FCR) to improve model performance on MCQs with low ($mathcal{CS}$). Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed strategy only costs 85% of SOTA, while still achieves average accuracy improvement of 1.56% across nine datasets including arithmetic, commonsense, and logic reasoning tasks. The code is at url{https://github.com/AiMijie/Divide-and-Conquer}
Read more4/4/2024
0
Multi-Conditional Ranking with Large Language Models
Pouya Pezeshkpour, Estevam Hruschka
Utilizing large language models (LLMs) to rank a set of items has become a common approach in recommendation and retrieval systems. Typically, these systems focus on ordering a substantial number of documents in a monotonic order based on a given query. However, real-world scenarios often present a different challenge: ranking a comparatively smaller set of items, but according to a variety of diverse and occasionally conflicting conditions. In this paper, we define and explore the task of multi-conditional ranking by introducing MCRank, a benchmark tailored for assessing multi-conditional ranking across various item types and conditions. Our analysis of LLMs using MCRank indicates a significant decrease in performance as the number and complexity of items and conditions grow. To overcome this limitation, we propose a novel decomposed reasoning method, consisting of EXtracting and Sorting the conditions, and then Iteratively Ranking the items (EXSIR). Our extensive experiments show that this decomposed reasoning method enhances LLMs' performance significantly, achieving up to a 12% improvement over existing LLMs. We also provide a detailed analysis of LLMs performance across various condition categories, and examine the effectiveness of decomposition step. Furthermore, we compare our method with existing approaches such as Chain-of-Thought and existing ranking models, demonstrating the superiority of our approach and complexity of MCR task. We released our dataset and code.
Read more8/12/2024
🏋️
0
RealMedQA: A pilot biomedical question answering dataset containing realistic clinical questions
Gregory Kell, Angus Roberts, Serge Umansky, Yuti Khare, Najma Ahmed, Nikhil Patel, Chloe Simela, Jack Coumbe, Julian Rozario, Ryan-Rhys Griffiths, Iain J. Marshall
Clinical question answering systems have the potential to provide clinicians with relevant and timely answers to their questions. Nonetheless, despite the advances that have been made, adoption of these systems in clinical settings has been slow. One issue is a lack of question-answering datasets which reflect the real-world needs of health professionals. In this work, we present RealMedQA, a dataset of realistic clinical questions generated by humans and an LLM. We describe the process for generating and verifying the QA pairs and assess several QA models on BioASQ and RealMedQA to assess the relative difficulty of matching answers to questions. We show that the LLM is more cost-efficient for generating ideal QA pairs. Additionally, we achieve a lower lexical similarity between questions and answers than BioASQ which provides an additional challenge to the top two QA models, as per the results. We release our code and our dataset publicly to encourage further research.
Read more8/19/2024