On Measuring Calibration of Discrete Probabilistic Neural Networks
2405.12412
0
0
š§
Abstract
As machine learning systems become increasingly integrated into real-world applications, accurately representing uncertainty is crucial for enhancing their safety, robustness, and reliability. Training neural networks to fit high-dimensional probability distributions via maximum likelihood has become an effective method for uncertainty quantification. However, such models often exhibit poor calibration, leading to overconfident predictions. Traditional metrics like Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and Negative Log Likelihood (NLL) have limitations, including biases and parametric assumptions. This paper proposes a new approach using conditional kernel mean embeddings to measure calibration discrepancies without these biases and assumptions. Preliminary experiments on synthetic data demonstrate the method's potential, with future work planned for more complex applications.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- As machine learning systems become more integrated into real-world applications, accurately representing uncertainty is crucial for enhancing their safety, robustness, and reliability.
- Training neural networks to fit high-dimensional probability distributions via maximum likelihood has become an effective method for uncertainty quantification.
- However, these models often exhibit poor calibration, leading to overconfident predictions.
- Traditional metrics like Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and Negative Log Likelihood (NLL) have limitations, including biases and parametric assumptions.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models are increasingly being used in real-world applications, such as self-driving cars, medical diagnosis, and financial forecasting. In these critical domains, it's essential that the models can accurately represent their own uncertainty. This helps ensure the models are safe, robust, and reliable.
One common approach to quantifying uncertainty is to train neural networks to fit high-dimensional probability distributions. This allows the models to provide probabilistic outputs rather than just a single prediction. However, these models often struggle with calibration, meaning their predicted probabilities don't always match the true likelihood of the outcomes.
Traditional ways of measuring calibration, like Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and Negative Log Likelihood (NLL), have some limitations. They can be biased or make assumptions that don't always hold true. This paper proposes a new method using conditional kernel mean embeddings to measure calibration discrepancies without these issues.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new approach for evaluating the calibration of neural networks trained to fit high-dimensional probability distributions. This is an important problem, as overconfident predictions from poorly calibrated models can lead to serious issues in safety-critical applications.
Traditional metrics like ECE and NLL have limitations, including biases and parametric assumptions that can affect their reliability. The new method proposed in this paper uses conditional kernel mean embeddings to measure calibration discrepancies without these issues.
The authors demonstrate the potential of their approach through preliminary experiments on synthetic data. They plan to explore the method further on more complex real-world applications in future work. The survey on calibration in deep learning provides helpful context for understanding the significance of this research.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising new approach for evaluating the calibration of probabilistic machine learning models. The authors provide evidence that their method can overcome some of the limitations of traditional calibration metrics, which is an important contribution.
However, the experiments are still quite preliminary, focusing only on synthetic data. It will be crucial to see how the method performs on more realistic and complex real-world datasets before drawing strong conclusions. The authors acknowledge this as an area for future work.
Additionally, while the paper provides a technical description of the new calibration measure, it lacks a deeper discussion of the potential implications and applications of this research. A more thorough exploration of how the proposed approach could enhance the safety and reliability of machine learning systems in practice would strengthen the impact of the work.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach for measuring the calibration of neural networks trained to model high-dimensional probability distributions. By using conditional kernel mean embeddings, the method can quantify calibration discrepancies without the biases and assumptions that limit traditional metrics like ECE and NLL.
The preliminary experiments on synthetic data demonstrate the potential of this new calibration measure. However, further research is needed to validate the approach on more complex real-world applications and explore its broader impacts on enhancing the safety and reliability of machine learning systems.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward in improving the uncertainty quantification capabilities of neural networks, which is crucial as these models become more deeply integrated into mission-critical domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š
Calibration-Aware Bayesian Learning
Jiayi Huang, Sangwoo Park, Osvaldo Simeone
0
0
Deep learning models, including modern systems like large language models, are well known to offer unreliable estimates of the uncertainty of their decisions. In order to improve the quality of the confidence levels, also known as calibration, of a model, common approaches entail the addition of either data-dependent or data-independent regularization terms to the training loss. Data-dependent regularizers have been recently introduced in the context of conventional frequentist learning to penalize deviations between confidence and accuracy. In contrast, data-independent regularizers are at the core of Bayesian learning, enforcing adherence of the variational distribution in the model parameter space to a prior density. The former approach is unable to quantify epistemic uncertainty, while the latter is severely affected by model misspecification. In light of the limitations of both methods, this paper proposes an integrated framework, referred to as calibration-aware Bayesian neural networks (CA-BNNs), that applies both regularizers while optimizing over a variational distribution as in Bayesian learning. Numerical results validate the advantages of the proposed approach in terms of expected calibration error (ECE) and reliability diagrams.
4/15/2024
Full-ECE: A Metric For Token-level Calibration on Large Language Models
Han Liu, Yupeng Zhang, Bingning Wang, Weipeng Chen, Xiaolin Hu
0
0
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) excel in various domains but face challenges in providing accurate uncertainty estimates, which are crucial for high-stakes applications. Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as powerful tools, demonstrating exceptional performance in language tasks. However, traditional calibration metrics such as Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and classwise-ECE (cw-ECE) are inadequate for LLMs due to their vast vocabularies, data complexity, and distributional focus. To address this, we propose a novel calibration concept called full calibration and introduce its corresponding metric, Full-ECE. Full-ECE evaluates the entire predicted probability distribution, offering a more accurate and robust measure of calibration for LLMs.
6/18/2024
ā
How Flawed Is ECE? An Analysis via Logit Smoothing
Muthu Chidambaram, Holden Lee, Colin McSwiggen, Semon Rezchikov
0
0
Informally, a model is calibrated if its predictions are correct with a probability that matches the confidence of the prediction. By far the most common method in the literature for measuring calibration is the expected calibration error (ECE). Recent work, however, has pointed out drawbacks of ECE, such as the fact that it is discontinuous in the space of predictors. In this work, we ask: how fundamental are these issues, and what are their impacts on existing results? Towards this end, we completely characterize the discontinuities of ECE with respect to general probability measures on Polish spaces. We then use the nature of these discontinuities to motivate a novel continuous, easily estimated miscalibration metric, which we term Logit-Smoothed ECE (LS-ECE). By comparing the ECE and LS-ECE of pre-trained image classification models, we show in initial experiments that binned ECE closely tracks LS-ECE, indicating that the theoretical pathologies of ECE may be avoidable in practice.
6/4/2024
Reassessing How to Compare and Improve the Calibration of Machine Learning Models
Muthu Chidambaram, Rong Ge
0
0
A machine learning model is calibrated if its predicted probability for an outcome matches the observed frequency for that outcome conditional on the model prediction. This property has become increasingly important as the impact of machine learning models has continued to spread to various domains. As a result, there are now a dizzying number of recent papers on measuring and improving the calibration of (specifically deep learning) models. In this work, we reassess the reporting of calibration metrics in the recent literature. We show that there exist trivial recalibration approaches that can appear seemingly state-of-the-art unless calibration and prediction metrics (i.e. test accuracy) are accompanied by additional generalization metrics such as negative log-likelihood. We then derive a calibration-based decomposition of Bregman divergences that can be used to both motivate a choice of calibration metric based on a generalization metric, and to detect trivial calibration. Finally, we apply these ideas to develop a new extension to reliability diagrams that can be used to jointly visualize calibration as well as the estimated generalization error of a model.
6/7/2024