Calibration in Deep Learning: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art

2308.01222

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/13/2024 by Cheng Wang

🤿

Abstract

Calibrating deep neural models plays an important role in building reliable, robust AI systems in safety-critical applications. Recent work has shown that modern neural networks that possess high predictive capability are poorly calibrated and produce unreliable model predictions. Though deep learning models achieve remarkable performance on various benchmarks, the study of model calibration and reliability is relatively underexplored. Ideal deep models should have not only high predictive performance but also be well calibrated. There have been some recent advances in calibrating deep models. In this survey, we review the state-of-the-art calibration methods and their principles for performing model calibration. First, we start with the definition of model calibration and explain the root causes of model miscalibration. Then we introduce the key metrics that can measure this aspect. It is followed by a summary of calibration methods that we roughly classify into four categories: post-hoc calibration, regularization methods, uncertainty estimation, and composition methods. We also cover recent advancements in calibrating large models, particularly large language models (LLMs). Finally, we discuss some open issues, challenges, and potential directions.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Calibrating deep neural networks is crucial for building reliable and robust AI systems in safety-critical applications.
  • Modern neural networks with high predictive capability are often poorly calibrated, producing unreliable model predictions.
  • The study of model calibration and reliability is relatively underexplored, despite the importance of having well-calibrated deep models.
  • Recent advances have been made in calibrating deep models, and this survey reviews the state-of-the-art calibration methods and their principles.

Plain English Explanation

Deep neural networks have become incredibly powerful at tasks like image recognition and language processing. However, these advanced models can sometimes produce predictions that are not very reliable or trustworthy. For example, a model might be highly confident in its answer, even when it's incorrect.

Calibrating these deep neural models is crucial, especially for safety-critical applications like self-driving cars or medical diagnosis. A well-calibrated model not only performs well, but also provides accurate estimates of its own uncertainty. This helps ensure the model's predictions can be trusted.

Unfortunately, the study of model calibration and reliability has been relatively neglected, even as deep learning has become more prominent. Researchers have recently begun exploring new techniques to better calibrate deep neural networks, and this paper provides an overview of the state-of-the-art methods.

The paper starts by defining what model calibration is and explaining why modern neural networks often struggle with this. It then introduces key metrics for measuring calibration. The bulk of the paper summarizes different categories of calibration methods, including post-hoc calibration, regularization techniques, uncertainty estimation, and composite approaches.

The paper also covers recent progress in calibrating large language models, which are increasingly being used in high-stakes applications. Finally, it discusses open challenges and potential future directions for this important area of research.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by highlighting the critical role of model calibration in building reliable and robust AI systems, particularly for safety-critical applications. It notes that while modern neural networks achieve remarkable predictive performance, they often suffer from poor calibration, leading to unreliable model outputs.

The authors first define model calibration and explain the root causes of miscalibration in deep learning models. They then introduce key metrics, such as calibration error, that can be used to measure this important property.

The paper then provides a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art calibration methods, roughly categorizing them into four groups:

  1. Post-hoc calibration: These methods aim to calibrate a pre-trained model, often using techniques like temperature scaling or Platt scaling.
  2. Regularization methods: These approaches incorporate calibration-aware loss functions or regularizers during the model training process.
  3. Uncertainty estimation: These methods focus on improving the model's ability to estimate its own uncertainty, which is closely linked to calibration.
  4. Composition methods: These techniques combine multiple calibration strategies, often leveraging the strengths of different approaches.

The authors also cover recent advancements in calibrating large language models (LLMs), which are increasingly being deployed in high-stakes applications and require careful calibration.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-organized overview of the state-of-the-art in model calibration research. The authors do a good job of defining the problem, explaining the importance of calibration, and systematically covering the various calibration methods.

One potential limitation of the work is that it does not delve deeply into the empirical performance of the different calibration techniques. While the paper summarizes the key principles and ideas behind each approach, more detailed comparisons of their practical effectiveness would be valuable for researchers and practitioners.

Additionally, the paper could have explored the potential trade-offs and challenges associated with achieving high calibration, particularly in complex, high-dimensional deep learning models. For example, the authors could have discussed how calibration might interact with other desirable model properties, such as predictive accuracy or computational efficiency.

Overall, this survey serves as a useful starting point for understanding the current landscape of model calibration research. It encourages readers to think critically about the importance of calibration and the various techniques available for improving it, which will be crucial as deep learning models continue to be deployed in high-stakes real-world applications.

Conclusion

This paper provides a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art in model calibration for deep neural networks. The authors emphasize the critical importance of calibration for building reliable and trustworthy AI systems, particularly in safety-critical applications.

The paper covers the definition of model calibration, the root causes of miscalibration, and the key metrics used to measure it. It then summarizes the major categories of calibration methods, including post-hoc techniques, regularization approaches, uncertainty estimation, and composite strategies.

The authors also highlight recent progress in calibrating large language models, which are seeing growing use in high-stakes domains. Finally, the paper discusses open challenges and potential future directions in this important area of research.

Overall, this survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners looking to understand the current state of model calibration and the various techniques available for improving the reliability of deep learning systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Reassessing How to Compare and Improve the Calibration of Machine Learning Models

Reassessing How to Compare and Improve the Calibration of Machine Learning Models

Muthu Chidambaram, Rong Ge

YC

0

Reddit

0

A machine learning model is calibrated if its predicted probability for an outcome matches the observed frequency for that outcome conditional on the model prediction. This property has become increasingly important as the impact of machine learning models has continued to spread to various domains. As a result, there are now a dizzying number of recent papers on measuring and improving the calibration of (specifically deep learning) models. In this work, we reassess the reporting of calibration metrics in the recent literature. We show that there exist trivial recalibration approaches that can appear seemingly state-of-the-art unless calibration and prediction metrics (i.e. test accuracy) are accompanied by additional generalization metrics such as negative log-likelihood. We then derive a calibration-based decomposition of Bregman divergences that can be used to both motivate a choice of calibration metric based on a generalization metric, and to detect trivial calibration. Finally, we apply these ideas to develop a new extension to reliability diagrams that can be used to jointly visualize calibration as well as the estimated generalization error of a model.

Read more

6/7/2024

Calibration of Continual Learning Models

Calibration of Continual Learning Models

Lanpei Li, Elia Piccoli, Andrea Cossu, Davide Bacciu, Vincenzo Lomonaco

YC

0

Reddit

0

Continual Learning (CL) focuses on maximizing the predictive performance of a model across a non-stationary stream of data. Unfortunately, CL models tend to forget previous knowledge, thus often underperforming when compared with an offline model trained jointly on the entire data stream. Given that any CL model will eventually make mistakes, it is of crucial importance to build calibrated CL models: models that can reliably tell their confidence when making a prediction. Model calibration is an active research topic in machine learning, yet to be properly investigated in CL. We provide the first empirical study of the behavior of calibration approaches in CL, showing that CL strategies do not inherently learn calibrated models. To mitigate this issue, we design a continual calibration approach that improves the performance of post-processing calibration methods over a wide range of different benchmarks and CL strategies. CL does not necessarily need perfect predictive models, but rather it can benefit from reliable predictive models. We believe our study on continual calibration represents a first step towards this direction.

Read more

4/15/2024

🤿

Deep Learning for Camera Calibration and Beyond: A Survey

Kang Liao, Lang Nie, Shujuan Huang, Chunyu Lin, Jing Zhang, Yao Zhao, Moncef Gabbouj, Dacheng Tao

YC

0

Reddit

0

Camera calibration involves estimating camera parameters to infer geometric features from captured sequences, which is crucial for computer vision and robotics. However, conventional calibration is laborious and requires dedicated collection. Recent efforts show that learning-based solutions have the potential to be used in place of the repeatability works of manual calibrations. Among these solutions, various learning strategies, networks, geometric priors, and datasets have been investigated. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey of learning-based camera calibration techniques, by analyzing their strengths and limitations. Our main calibration categories include the standard pinhole camera model, distortion camera model, cross-view model, and cross-sensor model, following the research trend and extended applications. As there is no benchmark in this community, we collect a holistic calibration dataset that can serve as a public platform to evaluate the generalization of existing methods. It comprises both synthetic and real-world data, with images and videos captured by different cameras in diverse scenes. Toward the end of this paper, we discuss the challenges and provide further research directions. To our knowledge, this is the first survey for the learning-based camera calibration (spanned 8 years). The summarized methods, datasets, and benchmarks are available and will be regularly updated at https://github.com/KangLiao929/Awesome-Deep-Camera-Calibration.

Read more

6/5/2024

🐍

Calibration-Aware Bayesian Learning

Jiayi Huang, Sangwoo Park, Osvaldo Simeone

YC

0

Reddit

0

Deep learning models, including modern systems like large language models, are well known to offer unreliable estimates of the uncertainty of their decisions. In order to improve the quality of the confidence levels, also known as calibration, of a model, common approaches entail the addition of either data-dependent or data-independent regularization terms to the training loss. Data-dependent regularizers have been recently introduced in the context of conventional frequentist learning to penalize deviations between confidence and accuracy. In contrast, data-independent regularizers are at the core of Bayesian learning, enforcing adherence of the variational distribution in the model parameter space to a prior density. The former approach is unable to quantify epistemic uncertainty, while the latter is severely affected by model misspecification. In light of the limitations of both methods, this paper proposes an integrated framework, referred to as calibration-aware Bayesian neural networks (CA-BNNs), that applies both regularizers while optimizing over a variational distribution as in Bayesian learning. Numerical results validate the advantages of the proposed approach in terms of expected calibration error (ECE) and reliability diagrams.

Read more

4/15/2024