Measuring User Understanding in Dialogue-based XAI Systems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores how to measure user understanding in dialogue-based explainable AI (XAI) systems.
- The authors conducted experiments to assess the effectiveness of different XAI techniques in helping users understand AI decision-making.
- They focused on dialogue-based interaction, where users can ask questions and receive explanations from the AI system.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how we can evaluate whether people truly understand the reasoning behind decisions made by AI systems. This is an important challenge, as AI is increasingly being used to make important decisions that impact people's lives.
The researchers are specifically interested in
To test this, the researchers conducted experiments where they had people interact with different XAI systems and then measured how well the users understood the AI's decision-making process. They used various techniques, like having users answer comprehension questions or describe the AI's reasoning in their own words.
The goal was to figure out which XAI approaches work best for helping people grasp why the AI made the decisions it did. This knowledge can then be used to design better, more transparent AI systems that are easier for humans to understand and trust.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores methods for measuring user understanding in dialogue-based XAI systems. The authors conducted experiments to assess the effectiveness of different XAI techniques in supporting user understanding of AI decision-making.
The researchers focused on dialogue-based interaction, where users can ask questions and receive explanations from the AI system. This interactive approach is hypothesized to be more effective than static explanation methods.
In the experiments, participants interacted with various XAI systems and the researchers measured user understanding using techniques like comprehension questions and free-form descriptions of the AI's reasoning. The goal was to identify which XAI approaches best enable users to grasp the decision-making process.
The findings can inform the design of more transparent and understandable AI systems that foster user trust and appropriate reliance.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the field of explainable AI by systematically evaluating different approaches for measuring user understanding. The experimental methodology is rigorous, and the results offer insights into the strengths and limitations of dialogue-based XAI systems.
One potential limitation is the focus on narrow, task-oriented AI applications rather than more open-ended, real-world scenarios. The researchers acknowledge this and suggest further work is needed to assess user understanding in more complex, ambiguous situations.
Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore potential biases or individual differences that may influence how users comprehend AI explanations. Factors like domain expertise, cognitive abilities, and cultural background could affect the effectiveness of different XAI techniques.
Overall, this research represents an important step forward in developing reliable methods for evaluating the impact of XAI on user understanding. Continued work in this area will be crucial as AI systems become more prominent and influential in people's lives.
Conclusion
This paper presents a detailed investigation into measuring user understanding in dialogue-based XAI systems. The experimental findings offer valuable insights for designing AI systems that can effectively communicate their decision-making processes to human users.
By better understanding the strengths and limitations of various XAI techniques, researchers and practitioners can work towards developing AI applications that are more transparent, accountable, and trustworthy. This is a crucial step in realizing the full potential of AI while mitigating risks and fostering responsible innovation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Measuring User Understanding in Dialogue-based XAI Systems
Dimitry Mindlin, Amelie Sophie Robrecht, Michael Morasch, Philipp Cimiano
The field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is increasingly recognizing the need to personalize and/or interactively adapt the explanation to better reflect users' explanation needs. While dialogue-based approaches to XAI have been proposed recently, the state-of-the-art in XAI is still characterized by what we call one-shot, non-personalized and one-way explanations. In contrast, dialogue-based systems that can adapt explanations through interaction with a user promise to be superior to GUI-based or dashboard explanations as they offer a more intuitive way of requesting information. In general, while interactive XAI systems are often evaluated in terms of user satisfaction, there are limited studies that access user's objective model understanding. This is in particular the case for dialogue-based XAI approaches. In this paper, we close this gap by carrying out controlled experiments within a dialogue framework in which we measure understanding of users in three phases by asking them to simulate the predictions of the model they are learning about. By this, we can quantify the level of (improved) understanding w.r.t. how the model works, comparing the state prior, and after the interaction. We further analyze the data to reveal patterns of how the interaction between groups with high vs. low understanding gain differ. Overall, our work thus contributes to our understanding about the effectiveness of XAI approaches.
Read more8/15/2024
🏅
0
From Black Boxes to Conversations: Incorporating XAI in a Conversational Agent
Van Bach Nguyen, Jorg Schlotterer, Christin Seifert
The goal of Explainable AI (XAI) is to design methods to provide insights into the reasoning process of black-box models, such as deep neural networks, in order to explain them to humans. Social science research states that such explanations should be conversational, similar to human-to-human explanations. In this work, we show how to incorporate XAI in a conversational agent, using a standard design for the agent comprising natural language understanding and generation components. We build upon an XAI question bank, which we extend by quality-controlled paraphrases, to understand the user's information needs. We further systematically survey the literature for suitable explanation methods that provide the information to answer those questions, and present a comprehensive list of suggestions. Our work is the first step towards truly natural conversations about machine learning models with an explanation agent. The comprehensive list of XAI questions and the corresponding explanation methods may support other researchers in providing the necessary information to address users' demands. To facilitate future work, we release our source code and data.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Interaction as Explanation: A User Interaction-based Method for Explaining Image Classification Models
Hyeonggeun Yun
In computer vision, explainable AI (xAI) methods seek to mitigate the 'black-box' problem by making the decision-making process of deep learning models more interpretable and transparent. Traditional xAI methods concentrate on visualizing input features that influence model predictions, providing insights primarily suited for experts. In this work, we present an interaction-based xAI method that enhances user comprehension of image classification models through their interaction. Thus, we developed a web-based prototype allowing users to modify images via painting and erasing, thereby observing changes in classification results. Our approach enables users to discern critical features influencing the model's decision-making process, aligning their mental models with the model's logic. Experiments conducted with five images demonstrate the potential of the method to reveal feature importance through user interaction. Our work contributes a novel perspective to xAI by centering on end-user engagement and understanding, paving the way for more intuitive and accessible explainability in AI systems.
Read more8/15/2024
0
Tell me more: Intent Fulfilment Framework for Enhancing User Experiences in Conversational XAI
Anjana Wijekoon, David Corsar, Nirmalie Wiratunga, Kyle Martin, Pedram Salimi
The evolution of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emphasised the significance of meeting diverse user needs. The approaches to identifying and addressing these needs must also advance, recognising that explanation experiences are subjective, user-centred processes that interact with users towards a better understanding of AI decision-making. This paper delves into the interrelations in multi-faceted XAI and examines how different types of explanations collaboratively meet users' XAI needs. We introduce the Intent Fulfilment Framework (IFF) for creating explanation experiences. The novelty of this paper lies in recognising the importance of follow-up on explanations for obtaining clarity, verification and/or substitution. Moreover, the Explanation Experience Dialogue Model integrates the IFF and Explanation Followups to provide users with a conversational interface for exploring their explanation needs, thereby creating explanation experiences. Quantitative and qualitative findings from our comparative user study demonstrate the impact of the IFF in improving user engagement, the utility of the AI system and the overall user experience. Overall, we reinforce the principle that one explanation does not fit all to create explanation experiences that guide the complex interaction through conversation.
Read more5/20/2024