May I Ask a Follow-up Question? Understanding the Benefits of Conversations in Neural Network Explainability

Read original: arXiv:2309.13965 - Published 8/13/2024 by Tong Zhang, X. Jessie Yang, Boyang Li
Total Score

0

May I Ask a Follow-up Question? Understanding the Benefits of Conversations in Neural Network Explainability

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper explores the benefits of incorporating conversations into the explainability of neural networks.
  • The authors argue that conversational interactions can enhance the interpretability and usability of Explainable AI (XAI) systems.
  • The paper presents insights and lessons learned from several studies on the use of conversational interfaces for XAI.

Plain English Explanation

Neural networks, a type of machine learning model, are powerful tools that can solve complex problems. However, they can be difficult to understand, as they operate like "black boxes" - their inner workings are not easily interpretable.

Explainable AI (XAI) aims to make these models more transparent and understandable to humans. The authors of this paper suggest that incorporating conversational interactions into XAI systems can further improve their interpretability and usefulness.

The key idea is that by allowing users to ask follow-up questions and engage in a dialog, the AI system can provide more tailored and contextual explanations. This interactive explanation can help users better understand the model's reasoning and build trust in the system's outputs.

The paper discusses lessons learned from several studies on conversational XAI, highlighting the benefits and challenges of this approach. It suggests that future XAI systems should be designed with a focus on human-centric interaction and user experience.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents several studies that explore the use of conversational interfaces for improving the interpretability and usability of XAI systems. The authors argue that by allowing users to engage in a dialog with the AI system, they can gain a deeper understanding of the model's reasoning and decision-making process.

The studies involved the development of prototype conversational XAI systems, where users could ask follow-up questions and receive more detailed explanations. The authors evaluated the effectiveness of these systems through user studies, measuring factors such as user satisfaction, trust, and overall understanding of the model's outputs.

The findings suggest that conversational interactions can indeed enhance the interpretability of XAI systems. Users were able to gain a better understanding of the models' reasoning and were more likely to trust the system's outputs. However, the authors also identified several challenges, such as the need for natural language processing capabilities and the risk of overwhelming users with too much information.

The paper concludes by discussing the implications of these findings for the design of future XAI systems. The authors suggest that human-centric design principles should be a key focus, ensuring that the XAI system provides a seamless and intuitive user experience.

Critical Analysis

The research presented in this paper makes a compelling case for the benefits of incorporating conversational interactions into XAI systems. The authors have conducted thorough user studies and provided valuable insights on the challenges and opportunities of this approach.

One potential limitation of the research is the relatively small scale of the user studies. While the findings are promising, it would be beneficial to see the concepts tested in larger-scale, real-world scenarios to further validate the benefits and identify any additional challenges.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the technical complexities of implementing conversational XAI systems, such as the natural language processing and dialogue management requirements. Further research on the practical implementation and scalability of these systems would be valuable.

Overall, the paper presents a strong case for the integration of conversations into XAI, highlighting the potential to enhance the interpretability and usability of these important AI systems. The insights and lessons learned can inform the design of future XAI systems and contribute to the ongoing efforts to make AI more transparent and trustworthy.

Conclusion

This research paper demonstrates the potential benefits of incorporating conversations into the explainability of neural networks. By allowing users to engage in a dialog with the AI system and ask follow-up questions, the authors show that the interpretability and usability of XAI can be significantly improved.

The key takeaway is that human-centric design should be a primary focus for the future of XAI. By prioritizing the user experience and enabling more natural, interactive explanations, XAI systems can become more accessible and trustworthy to a wider range of stakeholders. This research represents an important step towards realizing the full potential of explainable AI.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

May I Ask a Follow-up Question? Understanding the Benefits of Conversations in Neural Network Explainability
Total Score

0

May I Ask a Follow-up Question? Understanding the Benefits of Conversations in Neural Network Explainability

Tong Zhang, X. Jessie Yang, Boyang Li

Research in explainable AI (XAI) aims to provide insights into the decision-making process of opaque AI models. To date, most XAI methods offer one-off and static explanations, which cannot cater to the diverse backgrounds and understanding levels of users. With this paper, we investigate if free-form conversations can enhance users' comprehension of static explanations, improve acceptance and trust in the explanation methods, and facilitate human-AI collaboration. Participants are presented with static explanations, followed by a conversation with a human expert regarding the explanations. We measure the effect of the conversation on participants' ability to choose, from three machine learning models, the most accurate one based on explanations and their self-reported comprehension, acceptance, and trust. Empirical results show that conversations significantly improve comprehension, acceptance, trust, and collaboration. Our findings highlight the importance of customized model explanations in the format of free-form conversations and provide insights for the future design of conversational explanations.

Read more

8/13/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

From Black Boxes to Conversations: Incorporating XAI in a Conversational Agent

Van Bach Nguyen, Jorg Schlotterer, Christin Seifert

The goal of Explainable AI (XAI) is to design methods to provide insights into the reasoning process of black-box models, such as deep neural networks, in order to explain them to humans. Social science research states that such explanations should be conversational, similar to human-to-human explanations. In this work, we show how to incorporate XAI in a conversational agent, using a standard design for the agent comprising natural language understanding and generation components. We build upon an XAI question bank, which we extend by quality-controlled paraphrases, to understand the user's information needs. We further systematically survey the literature for suitable explanation methods that provide the information to answer those questions, and present a comprehensive list of suggestions. Our work is the first step towards truly natural conversations about machine learning models with an explanation agent. The comprehensive list of XAI questions and the corresponding explanation methods may support other researchers in providing the necessary information to address users' demands. To facilitate future work, we release our source code and data.

Read more

7/23/2024

Measuring User Understanding in Dialogue-based XAI Systems
Total Score

0

Measuring User Understanding in Dialogue-based XAI Systems

Dimitry Mindlin, Amelie Sophie Robrecht, Michael Morasch, Philipp Cimiano

The field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is increasingly recognizing the need to personalize and/or interactively adapt the explanation to better reflect users' explanation needs. While dialogue-based approaches to XAI have been proposed recently, the state-of-the-art in XAI is still characterized by what we call one-shot, non-personalized and one-way explanations. In contrast, dialogue-based systems that can adapt explanations through interaction with a user promise to be superior to GUI-based or dashboard explanations as they offer a more intuitive way of requesting information. In general, while interactive XAI systems are often evaluated in terms of user satisfaction, there are limited studies that access user's objective model understanding. This is in particular the case for dialogue-based XAI approaches. In this paper, we close this gap by carrying out controlled experiments within a dialogue framework in which we measure understanding of users in three phases by asking them to simulate the predictions of the model they are learning about. By this, we can quantify the level of (improved) understanding w.r.t. how the model works, comparing the state prior, and after the interaction. We further analyze the data to reveal patterns of how the interaction between groups with high vs. low understanding gain differ. Overall, our work thus contributes to our understanding about the effectiveness of XAI approaches.

Read more

8/15/2024

Explainability for Transparent Conversational Information-Seeking
Total Score

0

Explainability for Transparent Conversational Information-Seeking

Weronika {L}ajewska, Damiano Spina, Johanne Trippas, Krisztian Balog

The increasing reliance on digital information necessitates advancements in conversational search systems, particularly in terms of information transparency. While prior research in conversational information-seeking has concentrated on improving retrieval techniques, the challenge remains in generating responses useful from a user perspective. This study explores different methods of explaining the responses, hypothesizing that transparency about the source of the information, system confidence, and limitations can enhance users' ability to objectively assess the response. By exploring transparency across explanation type, quality, and presentation mode, this research aims to bridge the gap between system-generated responses and responses verifiable by the user. We design a user study to answer questions concerning the impact of (1) the quality of explanations enhancing the response on its usefulness and (2) ways of presenting explanations to users. The analysis of the collected data reveals lower user ratings for noisy explanations, although these scores seem insensitive to the quality of the response. Inconclusive results on the explanations presentation format suggest that it may not be a critical factor in this setting.

Read more

5/7/2024