MedMNIST-C: Comprehensive benchmark and improved classifier robustness by simulating realistic image corruptions
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposes a new benchmark dataset called MedMNIST-C for evaluating the robustness of medical image classification models
- Demonstrates that existing models perform poorly on this dataset, which simulates realistic image corruptions
- Introduces a data augmentation technique that improves model robustness on the MedMNIST-C benchmark
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new dataset called MedMNIST-C that is designed to test the robustness of medical image classification models. The dataset includes a variety of realistic image corruptions, such as blurriness, brightness changes, and simulated sensor noise, which can occur in real-world medical imaging scenarios.
The researchers found that existing models trained on standard medical image datasets performed poorly when evaluated on the MedMNIST-C benchmark. This suggests that these models are not sufficiently robust to the kinds of image distortions that can occur in practical applications.
To address this issue, the paper introduces a new data augmentation technique that can be used to train more robust models. By simulating these realistic image corruptions during training, the models learn to be more resilient to the types of distortions they are likely to encounter in the real world.
Technical Explanation
The MedMNIST-C dataset is based on the existing MedMNIST dataset, which consists of a variety of medical imaging datasets. The researchers applied a set of 15 different image corruption types, such as Gaussian noise, motion blur, and JPEG compression, to the MedMNIST images, creating a new benchmark dataset that tests model robustness.
The researchers evaluated several popular medical image classification models, including ResNet, DenseNet, and ViT, on the MedMNIST-C benchmark. They found that the models performed significantly worse on the corrupted images compared to the clean, undistorted images, indicating a lack of robustness.
To improve model robustness, the researchers introduced a new data augmentation technique called MedMNIST-C-Augmentation. This method applies the same set of image corruptions used in the MedMNIST-C dataset during the training process, forcing the models to learn features that are invariant to these types of distortions.
When evaluated on the MedMNIST-C benchmark, models trained with the MedMNIST-C-Augmentation technique showed significantly improved performance compared to those trained on the original MedMNIST dataset.
Critical Analysis
The MedMNIST-C dataset and the associated data augmentation technique represent a valuable contribution to the field of medical image analysis. By simulating realistic image corruptions, the benchmark provides a more comprehensive evaluation of model robustness, which is crucial for real-world deployment.
However, the paper does not address the potential limitations of the simulated corruptions. It would be interesting to see how the models perform on actual corrupted medical images, which may exhibit more complex and unpredictable distortions. Additionally, the paper does not explore the impact of the data augmentation technique on model generalization or performance on clean, uncorrupted images.
Further research could explore the transferability of the MedMNIST-C-Augmentation technique to other medical imaging datasets and tasks, as well as investigate the potential for combining this approach with other robustness-enhancing techniques, such as Explainable AI or Pose Estimation benchmarks.
Conclusion
The MedMNIST-C dataset and the associated data augmentation technique presented in this paper represent an important step towards developing more robust and reliable medical image classification models. By simulating realistic image corruptions, the benchmark provides a more comprehensive evaluation of model performance, which is crucial for real-world applications.
The findings of this research suggest that existing medical image classification models are not sufficiently robust to the types of distortions that can occur in practical scenarios. The proposed data augmentation technique offers a promising solution to this problem, demonstrating that models can be trained to be more resilient to these challenges.
As medical imaging continues to play a critical role in healthcare, the development of robust and reliable models is essential. The contributions of this paper, including the MedMNIST-C dataset and the data augmentation approach, can help drive progress in this important area of research, with potential benefits for patient care and clinical decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
MedMNIST-C: Comprehensive benchmark and improved classifier robustness by simulating realistic image corruptions
Francesco Di Salvo, Sebastian Doerrich, Christian Ledig
The integration of neural-network-based systems into clinical practice is limited by challenges related to domain generalization and robustness. The computer vision community established benchmarks such as ImageNet-C as a fundamental prerequisite to measure progress towards those challenges. Similar datasets are largely absent in the medical imaging community which lacks a comprehensive benchmark that spans across imaging modalities and applications. To address this gap, we create and open-source MedMNIST-C, a benchmark dataset based on the MedMNIST+ collection covering 12 datasets and 9 imaging modalities. We simulate task and modality-specific image corruptions of varying severity to comprehensively evaluate the robustness of established algorithms against real-world artifacts and distribution shifts. We further provide quantitative evidence that our simple-to-use artificial corruptions allow for highly performant, lightweight data augmentation to enhance model robustness. Unlike traditional, generic augmentation strategies, our approach leverages domain knowledge, exhibiting significantly higher robustness when compared to widely adopted methods. By introducing MedMNIST-C and open-sourcing the corresponding library allowing for targeted data augmentations, we contribute to the development of increasingly robust methods tailored to the challenges of medical imaging. The code is available at https://github.com/francescodisalvo05/medmnistc-api .
Read more7/24/2024
0
Rethinking Model Prototyping through the MedMNIST+ Dataset Collection
Sebastian Doerrich, Francesco Di Salvo, Julius Brockmann, Christian Ledig
The integration of deep learning based systems in clinical practice is often impeded by challenges rooted in limited and heterogeneous medical datasets. In addition, prioritization of marginal performance improvements on a few, narrowly scoped benchmarks over clinical applicability has slowed down meaningful algorithmic progress. This trend often results in excessive fine-tuning of existing methods to achieve state-of-the-art performance on selected datasets rather than fostering clinically relevant innovations. In response, this work presents a comprehensive benchmark for the MedMNIST+ database to diversify the evaluation landscape and conduct a thorough analysis of common convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Transformer-based architectures, for medical image classification. Our evaluation encompasses various medical datasets, training methodologies, and input resolutions, aiming to reassess the strengths and limitations of widely used model variants. Our findings suggest that computationally efficient training schemes and modern foundation models hold promise in bridging the gap between expensive end-to-end training and more resource-refined approaches. Additionally, contrary to prevailing assumptions, we observe that higher resolutions may not consistently improve performance beyond a certain threshold, advocating for the use of lower resolutions, particularly in prototyping stages, to expedite processing. Notably, our analysis reaffirms the competitiveness of convolutional models compared to ViT-based architectures emphasizing the importance of comprehending the intrinsic capabilities of different model architectures. Moreover, we hope that our standardized evaluation framework will help enhance transparency, reproducibility, and comparability on the MedMNIST+ dataset collection as well as future research within the field. Code is available at https://github.com/sdoerrich97 .
Read more5/9/2024
👀
0
New!A Survey on the Robustness of Computer Vision Models against Common Corruptions
Shunxin Wang, Raymond Veldhuis, Christoph Brune, Nicola Strisciuglio
The performance of computer vision models are susceptible to unexpected changes in input images caused by sensor errors or extreme imaging environments, known as common corruptions (e.g. noise, blur, illumination changes). These corruptions can significantly hinder the reliability of these models when deployed in real-world scenarios, yet they are often overlooked when testing model generalization and robustness. In this survey, we present a comprehensive overview of methods that improve the robustness of computer vision models against common corruptions. We categorize methods into three groups based on the model components and training methods they target: data augmentation, learning strategies, and network components. We release a unified benchmark framework (available at url{https://github.com/nis-research/CorruptionBenchCV}) to compare robustness performance across several datasets, and we address the inconsistencies of evaluation practices in the literature. Our experimental analysis highlights the base corruption robustness of popular vision backbones, revealing that corruption robustness does not necessarily scale with model size and data size. Large models gain negligible robustness improvements, considering the increased computational requirements. To achieve generalizable and robust computer vision models, we foresee the need of developing new learning strategies that efficiently exploit limited data and mitigate unreliable learning behaviors.
Read more9/17/2024
🤖
0
XIMAGENET-12: An Explainable AI Benchmark Dataset for Model Robustness Evaluation
Qiang Li, Dan Zhang, Shengzhao Lei, Xun Zhao, Porawit Kamnoedboon, WeiWei Li, Junhao Dong, Shuyan Li
Despite the promising performance of existing visual models on public benchmarks, the critical assessment of their robustness for real-world applications remains an ongoing challenge. To bridge this gap, we propose an explainable visual dataset, XIMAGENET-12, to evaluate the robustness of visual models. XIMAGENET-12 consists of over 200K images with 15,410 manual semantic annotations. Specifically, we deliberately selected 12 categories from ImageNet, representing objects commonly encountered in practical life. To simulate real-world situations, we incorporated six diverse scenarios, such as overexposure, blurring, and color changes, etc. We further develop a quantitative criterion for robustness assessment, allowing for a nuanced understanding of how visual models perform under varying conditions, notably in relation to the background. We make the XIMAGENET-12 dataset and its corresponding code openly accessible at url{https://sites.google.com/view/ximagenet-12/home}. We expect the introduction of the XIMAGENET-12 dataset will empower researchers to thoroughly evaluate the robustness of their visual models under challenging conditions.
Read more4/19/2024