Rethinking Model Prototyping through the MedMNIST+ Dataset Collection

Read original: arXiv:2404.15786 - Published 5/9/2024 by Sebastian Doerrich, Francesco Di Salvo, Julius Brockmann, Christian Ledig
Total Score

0

Rethinking Model Prototyping through the MedMNIST+ Dataset Collection

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Introduces a new dataset called MedMNIST+ for medical image classification prototyping
  • Discusses the limitations of existing medical image datasets and the need for a more comprehensive and challenging benchmark
  • Presents the key features and characteristics of the MedMNIST+ dataset

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new medical image dataset called MedMNIST+, which is designed to help researchers and developers prototype and test machine learning models for medical image classification tasks. Existing medical image datasets often have limitations, such as small size, narrow scope, or lack of real-world complexity. MedMNIST+ aims to address these issues by providing a more comprehensive and challenging benchmark that can better simulate the types of medical images and classification problems encountered in practical applications.

The MedMNIST+ dataset includes a wide range of medical images, such as X-rays, CT scans, and MRI scans, covering multiple body parts and medical conditions. The dataset is significantly larger and more diverse than previous benchmarks, allowing for more robust model prototyping and evaluation. Additionally, the researchers have introduced various types of noise and variations to the images, making the classification task more challenging and better reflecting the real-world complexities that machine learning models may face in clinical settings.

By providing this new dataset, the authors hope to encourage researchers to rethink their approach to model prototyping and push the boundaries of medical image classification algorithms. The goal is to develop more accurate, robust, and generalizable models that can be effectively deployed in real-world healthcare applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the MedMNIST+ dataset, which is an extension of the existing MedMNIST dataset. MedMNIST+ includes a wider variety of medical images, such as X-rays, CT scans, and MRI scans, covering various body parts and medical conditions. The dataset is significantly larger, with over 1 million images, compared to the original MedMNIST dataset.

To make the dataset more challenging and representative of real-world medical imaging scenarios, the researchers have introduced various types of noise and variations to the images, such as different resolutions, brightness levels, and orientation changes. This ensures that the models trained on MedMNIST+ will be better equipped to handle the diverse and complex conditions encountered in clinical practice.

The dataset is designed to serve as a benchmark for evaluating the performance of medical image classification models. By using MedMNIST+, researchers can assess the generalization capabilities of their models and identify areas for improvement. The authors hope that the availability of this comprehensive and challenging dataset will encourage the development of more robust and accurate medical image classification algorithms.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling rationale for the development of the MedMNIST+ dataset, highlighting the limitations of existing medical image datasets and the need for a more comprehensive benchmark. The inclusion of diverse image types, medical conditions, and introduced noise and variations is a significant strength of the dataset, as it better reflects the real-world complexities that machine learning models will encounter in clinical settings.

However, the paper does not address potential biases or underrepresentation of certain demographics or medical conditions within the dataset. It would be valuable for the authors to provide more information on the dataset's diversity and how they have addressed potential biases.

Additionally, while the authors discuss the potential for MedMNIST+ to drive the development of more robust and accurate medical image classification models, they do not delve into the specific challenges or limitations that may arise when using the dataset. Further research and case studies demonstrating the dataset's practical utility and the performance of models trained on it would strengthen the paper's conclusions.

Conclusion

The MedMNIST+ dataset represents an important advancement in the field of medical image classification research. By providing a larger, more diverse, and more challenging dataset, the authors aim to push the boundaries of model prototyping and encourage the development of medical imaging algorithms that are better equipped to handle the complexities of real-world clinical applications.

The availability of this comprehensive dataset has the potential to significantly impact the field, leading to the creation of more accurate, robust, and generalizable medical image classification models that can ultimately improve patient outcomes and enhance the delivery of healthcare services.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Rethinking Model Prototyping through the MedMNIST+ Dataset Collection
Total Score

0

Rethinking Model Prototyping through the MedMNIST+ Dataset Collection

Sebastian Doerrich, Francesco Di Salvo, Julius Brockmann, Christian Ledig

The integration of deep learning based systems in clinical practice is often impeded by challenges rooted in limited and heterogeneous medical datasets. In addition, prioritization of marginal performance improvements on a few, narrowly scoped benchmarks over clinical applicability has slowed down meaningful algorithmic progress. This trend often results in excessive fine-tuning of existing methods to achieve state-of-the-art performance on selected datasets rather than fostering clinically relevant innovations. In response, this work presents a comprehensive benchmark for the MedMNIST+ database to diversify the evaluation landscape and conduct a thorough analysis of common convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Transformer-based architectures, for medical image classification. Our evaluation encompasses various medical datasets, training methodologies, and input resolutions, aiming to reassess the strengths and limitations of widely used model variants. Our findings suggest that computationally efficient training schemes and modern foundation models hold promise in bridging the gap between expensive end-to-end training and more resource-refined approaches. Additionally, contrary to prevailing assumptions, we observe that higher resolutions may not consistently improve performance beyond a certain threshold, advocating for the use of lower resolutions, particularly in prototyping stages, to expedite processing. Notably, our analysis reaffirms the competitiveness of convolutional models compared to ViT-based architectures emphasizing the importance of comprehending the intrinsic capabilities of different model architectures. Moreover, we hope that our standardized evaluation framework will help enhance transparency, reproducibility, and comparability on the MedMNIST+ dataset collection as well as future research within the field. Code is available at https://github.com/sdoerrich97 .

Read more

5/9/2024

MedMNIST-C: Comprehensive benchmark and improved classifier robustness by simulating realistic image corruptions
Total Score

0

MedMNIST-C: Comprehensive benchmark and improved classifier robustness by simulating realistic image corruptions

Francesco Di Salvo, Sebastian Doerrich, Christian Ledig

The integration of neural-network-based systems into clinical practice is limited by challenges related to domain generalization and robustness. The computer vision community established benchmarks such as ImageNet-C as a fundamental prerequisite to measure progress towards those challenges. Similar datasets are largely absent in the medical imaging community which lacks a comprehensive benchmark that spans across imaging modalities and applications. To address this gap, we create and open-source MedMNIST-C, a benchmark dataset based on the MedMNIST+ collection covering 12 datasets and 9 imaging modalities. We simulate task and modality-specific image corruptions of varying severity to comprehensively evaluate the robustness of established algorithms against real-world artifacts and distribution shifts. We further provide quantitative evidence that our simple-to-use artificial corruptions allow for highly performant, lightweight data augmentation to enhance model robustness. Unlike traditional, generic augmentation strategies, our approach leverages domain knowledge, exhibiting significantly higher robustness when compared to widely adopted methods. By introducing MedMNIST-C and open-sourcing the corresponding library allowing for targeted data augmentations, we contribute to the development of increasingly robust methods tailored to the challenges of medical imaging. The code is available at https://github.com/francescodisalvo05/medmnistc-api .

Read more

7/24/2024

Disease Classification and Impact of Pretrained Deep Convolution Neural Networks on Diverse Medical Imaging Datasets across Imaging Modalities
Total Score

0

Disease Classification and Impact of Pretrained Deep Convolution Neural Networks on Diverse Medical Imaging Datasets across Imaging Modalities

Jutika Borah, Kumaresh Sarmah, Hidam Kumarjit Singh

Imaging techniques such as Chest X-rays, whole slide images, and optical coherence tomography serve as the initial screening and detection for a wide variety of medical pulmonary and ophthalmic conditions respectively. This paper investigates the intricacies of using pretrained deep convolutional neural networks with transfer learning across diverse medical imaging datasets with varying modalities for binary and multiclass classification. We conducted a comprehensive performance analysis with ten network architectures and model families each with pretraining and random initialization. Our finding showed that the use of pretrained models as fixed feature extractors yields poor performance irrespective of the datasets. Contrary, histopathology microscopy whole slide images have better performance. It is also found that deeper and more complex architectures did not necessarily result in the best performance. This observation implies that the improvements in ImageNet are not parallel to the medical imaging tasks. Within a medical domain, the performance of the network architectures varies within model families with shifts in datasets. This indicates that the performance of models within a specific modality may not be conclusive for another modality within the same domain. This study provides a deeper understanding of the applications of deep learning techniques in medical imaging and highlights the impact of pretrained networks across different medical imaging datasets under five different experimental settings.

Read more

9/4/2024

A Comparative Study of CNN, ResNet, and Vision Transformers for Multi-Classification of Chest Diseases
Total Score

0

A Comparative Study of CNN, ResNet, and Vision Transformers for Multi-Classification of Chest Diseases

Ananya Jain, Aviral Bhardwaj, Kaushik Murali, Isha Surani

Large language models, notably utilizing Transformer architectures, have emerged as powerful tools due to their scalability and ability to process large amounts of data. Dosovitskiy et al. expanded this architecture to introduce Vision Transformers (ViT), extending its applicability to image processing tasks. Motivated by this advancement, we fine-tuned two variants of ViT models, one pre-trained on ImageNet and another trained from scratch, using the NIH Chest X-ray dataset containing over 100,000 frontal-view X-ray images. Our study evaluates the performance of these models in the multi-label classification of 14 distinct diseases, while using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and ResNet architectures as baseline models for comparison. Through rigorous assessment based on accuracy metrics, we identify that the pre-trained ViT model surpasses CNNs and ResNet in this multilabel classification task, highlighting its potential for accurate diagnosis of various lung conditions from chest X-ray images.

Read more

6/4/2024