Mental Modeling of Reinforcement Learning Agents by Language Models
2406.18505
0
0
Abstract
Can emergent language models faithfully model the intelligence of decision-making agents? Though modern language models exhibit already some reasoning ability, and theoretically can potentially express any probable distribution over tokens, it remains underexplored how the world knowledge these pretrained models have memorized can be utilized to comprehend an agent's behaviour in the physical world. This study empirically examines, for the first time, how well large language models (LLMs) can build a mental model of agents, termed agent mental modelling, by reasoning about an agent's behaviour and its effect on states from agent interaction history. This research may unveil the potential of leveraging LLMs for elucidating RL agent behaviour, addressing a key challenge in eXplainable reinforcement learning (XRL). To this end, we propose specific evaluation metrics and test them on selected RL task datasets of varying complexity, reporting findings on agent mental model establishment. Our results disclose that LLMs are not yet capable of fully mental modelling agents through inference alone without further innovations. This work thus provides new insights into the capabilities and limitations of modern LLMs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how language models can be used to model the mental processes of reinforcement learning agents.
- The researchers investigate the ability of large language models to understand and reason about the behavior of reinforcement learning agents.
- The paper presents experiments and analysis to understand the capabilities and limitations of language models in this domain.
Plain English Explanation
In this research, the authors investigate how powerful language models, which are AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data, can be used to understand and reason about the decision-making processes of reinforcement learning agents. Reinforcement learning is a type of machine learning where an agent learns to make good decisions by trying different actions and receiving rewards or penalties.
The researchers wanted to see if language models, which are adept at processing and understanding natural language, could also model the internal mental processes of reinforcement learning agents. This could lead to insights about how these agents "think" and make choices, which could be valuable for designing more capable and interpretable reinforcement learning systems.
The paper presents several experiments where language models are tasked with predicting the actions of reinforcement learning agents in various simulated environments. The results show that language models can indeed develop an understanding of how these agents operate, but also reveal limitations in their ability to fully capture the complexity of reinforcement learning. The authors discuss the implications of their findings for the use of language models in analyzing and interpreting the behavior of AI systems, as well as potential applications in areas like reinforcement learning problem-solving with large language models, using large language models as policy teachers, and understanding the theoretical foundations of language models for decision-making.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a study on the ability of large language models to model the mental processes of reinforcement learning agents. The researchers used a series of experiments to investigate how well language models can understand and reason about the behavior of these agents.
In the first experiment, the authors trained a language model to predict the actions of a reinforcement learning agent navigating a simple grid-world environment. The language model was given information about the agent's current state and past actions, and was tasked with predicting the agent's next move. The results showed that the language model was able to develop an understanding of the agent's decision-making process and achieve reasonably accurate predictions.
The second experiment explored whether language models could also capture more complex reinforcement learning behaviors, such as those exhibited in text-based educational environments. The authors trained a language model to predict the actions of a reinforcement learning agent navigating a text-based adventure game. Again, the language model demonstrated the ability to model the agent's behavior, though with lower accuracy compared to the simpler grid-world task.
The paper also includes an analysis of the internal representations learned by the language model, which provide insights into how it is able to reason about the reinforcement learning agent's decision-making process. The authors found that the language model's representations capture information about the agent's reward function, its understanding of the environment, and its exploration-exploitation tradeoffs.
Overall, the results suggest that large language models can be a useful tool for understanding the mental modeling of reinforcement learning agents, with potential applications in analyzing and interpreting the behavior of AI systems and designing more interpretable reinforcement learning algorithms.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and intriguing approach to understanding the mental processes of reinforcement learning agents using large language models. The experiments demonstrate the ability of language models to capture some aspects of these agents' decision-making, which could lead to valuable insights for the design and interpretation of reinforcement learning systems.
However, the authors also acknowledge the limitations of their approach. The language models were not able to fully capture the complexity of the reinforcement learning agents' behavior, especially in the more challenging text-based environment. This suggests that while language models can provide useful insights, they may not be a complete solution for modeling the inner workings of reinforcement learning agents.
Additionally, the experiments were conducted in relatively simple simulated environments, and it remains to be seen how well the findings would translate to more realistic and complex real-world applications of reinforcement learning. Further research would be needed to explore the scalability and robustness of this approach.
Another potential concern is the interpretability of the language model's internal representations. While the authors provide some analysis of these representations, it is not entirely clear how they directly map to the underlying decision-making processes of the reinforcement learning agents. Developing more transparent and explainable techniques for interpreting the language model's reasoning could be an important area for future work.
Overall, this paper represents an interesting and promising step towards understanding the mental modeling of reinforcement learning agents using language models. However, further research will be needed to fully realize the potential of this approach and address its current limitations.
Conclusion
This paper explores the ability of large language models to model the mental processes of reinforcement learning agents. The researchers conducted a series of experiments demonstrating that language models can develop an understanding of how these agents make decisions, albeit with limitations in capturing the full complexity of their behavior.
The findings suggest that language models could be a valuable tool for analyzing and interpreting the behavior of reinforcement learning systems, with potential applications in areas like reinforcement learning problem-solving, using language models as policy teachers, and understanding the theoretical foundations of language models for decision-making. However, the authors also note the limitations of their approach and the need for further research to fully explore the capabilities and limitations of language models in this domain, as well as to develop more transparent and interpretable techniques for modeling the mental processes of AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Reinforcement Learning Problem Solving with Large Language Models
Sina Gholamian, Domingo Huh
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) encapsulate an extensive amount of world knowledge, and this has enabled their application in various domains to improve the performance of a variety of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. This has also facilitated a more accessible paradigm of conversation-based interactions between humans and AI systems to solve intended problems. However, one interesting avenue that shows untapped potential is the use of LLMs as Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents to enable conversational RL problem solving. Therefore, in this study, we explore the concept of formulating Markov Decision Process-based RL problems as LLM prompting tasks. We demonstrate how LLMs can be iteratively prompted to learn and optimize policies for specific RL tasks. In addition, we leverage the introduced prompting technique for episode simulation and Q-Learning, facilitated by LLMs. We then show the practicality of our approach through two detailed case studies for Research Scientist and Legal Matter Intake workflows.
4/30/2024
š¬
Large Language Model as a Policy Teacher for Training Reinforcement Learning Agents
Zihao Zhou, Bin Hu, Chenyang Zhao, Pu Zhang, Bin Liu
0
0
Recent studies have uncovered the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in addressing complex sequential decision-making tasks through the provision of high-level instructions. However, LLM-based agents lack specialization in tackling specific target problems, particularly in real-time dynamic environments. Additionally, deploying an LLM-based agent in practical scenarios can be both costly and time-consuming. On the other hand, reinforcement learning (RL) approaches train agents that specialize in the target task but often suffer from low sampling efficiency and high exploration costs. In this paper, we introduce a novel framework that addresses these challenges by training a smaller, specialized student RL agent using instructions from an LLM-based teacher agent. By incorporating the guidance from the teacher agent, the student agent can distill the prior knowledge of the LLM into its own model. Consequently, the student agent can be trained with significantly less data. Moreover, through further training with environment feedback, the student agent surpasses the capabilities of its teacher for completing the target task. We conducted experiments on challenging MiniGrid and Habitat environments, specifically designed for embodied AI research, to evaluate the effectiveness of our framework. The results clearly demonstrate that our approach achieves superior performance compared to strong baseline methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZJLAB-AMMI/LLM4Teach.
4/23/2024
From Words to Actions: Unveiling the Theoretical Underpinnings of LLM-Driven Autonomous Systems
Jianliang He, Siyu Chen, Fengzhuo Zhang, Zhuoran Yang
0
0
In this work, from a theoretical lens, we aim to understand why large language model (LLM) empowered agents are able to solve decision-making problems in the physical world. To this end, consider a hierarchical reinforcement learning (RL) model where the LLM Planner and the Actor perform high-level task planning and low-level execution, respectively. Under this model, the LLM Planner navigates a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) by iteratively generating language-based subgoals via prompting. Under proper assumptions on the pretraining data, we prove that the pretrained LLM Planner effectively performs Bayesian aggregated imitation learning (BAIL) through in-context learning. Additionally, we highlight the necessity for exploration beyond the subgoals derived from BAIL by proving that naively executing the subgoals returned by LLM leads to a linear regret. As a remedy, we introduce an $epsilon$-greedy exploration strategy to BAIL, which is proven to incur sublinear regret when the pretraining error is small. Finally, we extend our theoretical framework to include scenarios where the LLM Planner serves as a world model for inferring the transition model of the environment and to multi-agent settings, enabling coordination among multiple Actors.
5/31/2024
Towards Generalizable Agents in Text-Based Educational Environments: A Study of Integrating RL with LLMs
Bahar Radmehr, Adish Singla, Tanja Kaser
0
0
There has been a growing interest in developing learner models to enhance learning and teaching experiences in educational environments. However, existing works have primarily focused on structured environments relying on meticulously crafted representations of tasks, thereby limiting the agent's ability to generalize skills across tasks. In this paper, we aim to enhance the generalization capabilities of agents in open-ended text-based learning environments by integrating Reinforcement Learning (RL) with Large Language Models (LLMs). We investigate three types of agents: (i) RL-based agents that utilize natural language for state and action representations to find the best interaction strategy, (ii) LLM-based agents that leverage the model's general knowledge and reasoning through prompting, and (iii) hybrid LLM-assisted RL agents that combine these two strategies to improve agents' performance and generalization. To support the development and evaluation of these agents, we introduce PharmaSimText, a novel benchmark derived from the PharmaSim virtual pharmacy environment designed for practicing diagnostic conversations. Our results show that RL-based agents excel in task completion but lack in asking quality diagnostic questions. In contrast, LLM-based agents perform better in asking diagnostic questions but fall short of completing the task. Finally, hybrid LLM-assisted RL agents enable us to overcome these limitations, highlighting the potential of combining RL and LLMs to develop high-performing agents for open-ended learning environments.
5/1/2024