Merit-based Fair Combinatorial Semi-Bandit with Unrestricted Feedback Delays

Read original: arXiv:2407.15439 - Published 7/30/2024 by Ziqun Chen, Kechao Cai, Zhuoyue Chen, Jinbei Zhang, John C. S. Lui

Merit-based Fair Combinatorial Semi-Bandit with Unrestricted Feedback Delays

Overview

This research paper presents a novel algorithm for solving the combinatorial semi-bandit problem with unrestricted feedback delays.
The algorithm, called Merit-based Fair Combinatorial Semi-Bandit (MFCSB), aims to achieve fairness and optimal rewards in settings with delayed feedback.
The authors provide theoretical guarantees for the algorithm's performance and validate its effectiveness through extensive experiments.

Plain English Explanation

In the world of online decision-making, there are often situations where we need to choose a combination of items (like recommendations or resource allocations) to maximize some overall reward. This is known as the combinatorial semi-bandit problem. However, in many real-world scenarios, the feedback about the success or failure of our choices may not be immediate, but delayed. This introduces additional complexity and challenges.

The MFCSB algorithm proposed in this paper aims to address this challenge. It seeks to find the optimal combination of items while also ensuring fairness, even in the presence of unrestricted feedback delays. The key idea is to maintain a merit-based ranking of the available items and use this to guide the selection process in a fair and efficient manner.

The algorithm works by continuously updating the merit scores of the items based on the delayed feedback, and then using these scores to select the most promising combination of items. Crucially, it also incorporates a fairness component, ensuring that no single item or group of items dominates the selection process over time.

The paper provides theoretical guarantees for the algorithm's performance, showing that it can achieve near-optimal rewards while maintaining fairness. The authors also present extensive experiments that validate the effectiveness of the MFCSB algorithm in a variety of settings, including comparisons to other state-of-the-art approaches.

Technical Explanation

The MFCSB algorithm is designed to solve the combinatorial semi-bandit problem in the presence of unrestricted feedback delays. In this problem, the learner is presented with a set of items, and at each round, they must select a subset of these items (a "super-arm") to maximize the total reward. However, the learner only receives delayed and potentially partial feedback about the rewards associated with their chosen super-arm.

The key features of the MFCSB algorithm are:

Merit-based item selection: The algorithm maintains a merit-based ranking of the items, which is continuously updated based on the delayed feedback. This ranking is then used to guide the selection of the super-arm in a fair and efficient manner.
Fairness considerations: The algorithm incorporates a fairness component, ensuring that the selection process does not unfairly favor certain items or groups of items over time. This is achieved by adjusting the merit scores to promote more equitable exploration and exploitation.
Theoretical guarantees: The authors provide regret bounds for the MFCSB algorithm, showing that it can achieve near-optimal rewards while maintaining fairness, even in the presence of unrestricted feedback delays.

The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the MFCSB algorithm across a range of settings, including comparisons to other state-of-the-art approaches for combinatorial semi-bandit problems with delayed feedback.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and theoretically grounded algorithm for the combinatorial semi-bandit problem with unrestricted feedback delays. The authors have carefully addressed the challenges of fairness and optimality in this setting, and the MFCSB algorithm appears to be a significant contribution to the field.

However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations and areas for further research. For example, the theoretical guarantees are based on certain assumptions, such as the existence of a known distribution over the delayed feedback, which may not always hold in real-world scenarios.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential impact of the MFCSB algorithm on specific application domains, such as online recommendation systems or resource allocation problems. Further research could investigate the practical implications and considerations for deploying the algorithm in these contexts.

Conclusion

The MFCSB algorithm presented in this paper represents an important advancement in the field of combinatorial semi-bandit problems with delayed feedback. By incorporating fairness considerations and providing strong theoretical guarantees, the authors have developed a powerful tool for optimizing decision-making in complex, real-world environments.

The potential applications of this research are wide-ranging, spanning areas such as online recommendation systems, resource allocation, and decision-making under uncertainty. As the field continues to evolve, further exploration of the MFCSB algorithm and its various extensions and adaptations could yield valuable insights and breakthroughs.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Merit-based Fair Combinatorial Semi-Bandit with Unrestricted Feedback Delays

Ziqun Chen, Kechao Cai, Zhuoyue Chen, Jinbei Zhang, John C. S. Lui

We study the stochastic combinatorial semi-bandit problem with unrestricted feedback delays under merit-based fairness constraints. This is motivated by applications such as crowdsourcing, and online advertising, where immediate feedback is not immediately available and fairness among different choices (or arms) is crucial. We consider two types of unrestricted feedback delays: reward-independent delays where the feedback delays are independent of the rewards, and reward-dependent delays where the feedback delays are correlated with the rewards. Furthermore, we introduce merit-based fairness constraints to ensure a fair selection of the arms. We define the reward regret and the fairness regret and present new bandit algorithms to select arms under unrestricted feedback delays based on their merits. We prove that our algorithms all achieve sublinear expected reward regret and expected fairness regret, with a dependence on the quantiles of the delay distribution. We also conduct extensive experiments using synthetic and real-world data and show that our algorithms can fairly select arms with different feedback delays.

7/30/2024

Biased Dueling Bandits with Stochastic Delayed Feedback

Bongsoo Yi, Yue Kang, Yao Li

The dueling bandit problem, an essential variation of the traditional multi-armed bandit problem, has become significantly prominent recently due to its broad applications in online advertising, recommendation systems, information retrieval, and more. However, in many real-world applications, the feedback for actions is often subject to unavoidable delays and is not immediately available to the agent. This partially observable issue poses a significant challenge to existing dueling bandit literature, as it significantly affects how quickly and accurately the agent can update their policy on the fly. In this paper, we introduce and examine the biased dueling bandit problem with stochastic delayed feedback, revealing that this new practical problem will delve into a more realistic and intriguing scenario involving a preference bias between the selections. We present two algorithms designed to handle situations involving delay. Our first algorithm, requiring complete delay distribution information, achieves the optimal regret bound for the dueling bandit problem when there is no delay. The second algorithm is tailored for situations where the distribution is unknown, but only the expected value of delay is available. We provide a comprehensive regret analysis for the two proposed algorithms and then evaluate their empirical performance on both synthetic and real datasets.

8/28/2024

🌀

Blocking Bandits

Soumya Basu, Rajat Sen, Sujay Sanghavi, Sanjay Shakkottai

We consider a novel stochastic multi-armed bandit setting, where playing an arm makes it unavailable for a fixed number of time slots thereafter. This models situations where reusing an arm too often is undesirable (e.g. making the same product recommendation repeatedly) or infeasible (e.g. compute job scheduling on machines). We show that with prior knowledge of the rewards and delays of all the arms, the problem of optimizing cumulative reward does not admit any pseudo-polynomial time algorithm (in the number of arms) unless randomized exponential time hypothesis is false, by mapping to the PINWHEEL scheduling problem. Subsequently, we show that a simple greedy algorithm that plays the available arm with the highest reward is asymptotically $(1-1/e)$ optimal. When the rewards are unknown, we design a UCB based algorithm which is shown to have $c log T + o(log T)$ cumulative regret against the greedy algorithm, leveraging the free exploration of arms due to the unavailability. Finally, when all the delays are equal the problem reduces to Combinatorial Semi-bandits providing us with a lower bound of $c' log T+ omega(log T)$.

7/31/2024

🚀

BanditQ: Fair Bandits with Guaranteed Rewards

Abhishek Sinha

Classic no-regret multi-armed bandit algorithms, including the Upper Confidence Bound (UCB), Hedge, and EXP3, are inherently unfair by design. Their unfairness stems from their objective of playing the most rewarding arm as frequently as possible while ignoring the rest. In this paper, we consider a fair prediction problem in the stochastic setting with a guaranteed minimum rate of accrual of rewards for each arm. We study the problem in both full-information and bandit feedback settings. Combining queueing-theoretic techniques with adversarial bandits, we propose a new online policy, called BanditQ, that achieves the target reward rates while conceding a regret and target rate violation penalty of at most $O(T^{frac{3}{4}}).$ The regret bound in the full-information setting can be further improved to $O(sqrt{T})$ under either a monotonicity assumption or when considering time-averaged regret. The proposed policy is efficient and admits a black-box reduction from the fair prediction problem to the standard adversarial MAB problem. The analysis of the BanditQ policy involves a new self-bounding inequality, which might be of independent interest.

5/14/2024